I've long known that memory running @CAS2 has better latency, slightly improving system performance. However, the only benchmarks I remember (from 2 years ago) only showed a 1%-5% difference in actual performance at CAS2 vs. CAS3.
This is quite important to me, because a 256MB/PC133/CAS3 dimmstick costs ~$65 cheaper than its CAS2 equivalent. If we're looking at 3% better performance, there really are better ways to spend that $65 😀
So here is my question to you:
Does CAS2 make a bigger difference on a modern Tbird using a 133MHz FSB? I'll be using very FPU-intensive audio editing tools on a Tbird900, do you think CAS2 will make $65's worth of difference for me?
Thanks!
LeoV
This is quite important to me, because a 256MB/PC133/CAS3 dimmstick costs ~$65 cheaper than its CAS2 equivalent. If we're looking at 3% better performance, there really are better ways to spend that $65 😀
So here is my question to you:
Does CAS2 make a bigger difference on a modern Tbird using a 133MHz FSB? I'll be using very FPU-intensive audio editing tools on a Tbird900, do you think CAS2 will make $65's worth of difference for me?
Thanks!
LeoV