PBS The Vietnam War

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

AznAnarchy99

Lifer
Dec 6, 2004
14,695
117
106
one thing about the series is the coverage of the protest. the protest in the 60's and 70's compared to today were extremely violent and the numbers of people who participated is astonishing.

the Nixon tapes they played were amazing. good God that man was a total criminal.

Speaking of tapes, I'm wondering how much of the White House is actually recorded and how they got their hands on it for the documentary.
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,672
136
Not working anymore. Try clicking on a later episode and says you have to be a passport member.

Well that's bullshit I just watch the final episode on sunday on line. You have any form of on demand?

It is on TV this week I think.
 

AznAnarchy99

Lifer
Dec 6, 2004
14,695
117
106
Well that's bullshit I just watch the final episode on sunday on line. You have any form of on demand?

It is on TV this week I think.

Yeah they must have cut it off today or yesterday. I was half way through finishing episode 10 and was gonna watch it today.

I think I found it on YouTube.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,599
126
I am disappointed this is not on amazon instant or something. I was only halfway through EP1 :(
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
I had heard about this but have only caught about 15-20 minutes of it, during commercials of Fear the Walking Dead this past Sunday. Seemed pretty well done. My dad mentioned it was good too. That's awesome they are offering it streaming online; thank God for 2017. So much more convenient to watch it online, ANYTIME, than have to be home and free for some specific time when it airs.

And for public broadcasting instead of for-profit.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Listened to a spot on PBS radio about the Documentary. They had on Daniel Ellsberg of the Pentagon Papers fame. He was saying that the release of the Pentagon Papers and the anti war movement had a greater the outcome of the war then was presented in the documentary. I thought they could've covered it a little more. eh.

I saw the same criticism that the documentary gave short shrift to Ellsberg - who wasn't even interviewed for the documentary - and the Pentagon Papers.

That is sad to see and a forum of bias that reduces the quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thebobo

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Some south Vietnamese people are upset that they weren't mentioned very much but our troops were over there to fight against communism not for the South Vietnamese.

That's not exactly the real reason, but it was the reason given.

But protecting the South Vietnamese from the communists was a big part of the reason given as well as phony as it was. We were a lot more dangerous than any communists to other nations.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,849
146
I had heard about this but have only caught about 15-20 minutes of it, during commercials of Fear the Walking Dead this past Sunday. Seemed pretty well done. My dad mentioned it was good too. That's awesome they are offering it streaming online; thank God for 2017. So much more convenient to watch it online, ANYTIME, than have to be home and free for some specific time when it airs.

PBS has been making a wealth of great content available online for years. I cringe when I hear (often "fiscal conservatives") complain about funding public broadcasting. PBS is a national treasure, whose value, much like NASA is probably a thousand times over what its budget is. It is sad how much PBS is used as the butt of jokes in modern pop culture too, that's when its cited at all.

Netfix has a bunch of PBS content as well, which hopefully helps more people watch it. I'd love for Netflix to get into a co-development deal with PBS. Make it a force to be reckoned with as far as educating America (Frontline, Nova, documentaries like those of Ken Burns).

Reminds me of all the USA air support . . and the "Reds" still prevailed.

North Korea may not be so "easy" after all!

Well to be fair, Vietnam was a proxy war, and we were fighting more than just in Vietnam. Neither China nor Russia would likely provide direct aid like they did in Vietnam and Korea. And South Korea has a military that could stand up to North Korea pretty well (nukes would change that potentially, but then that would change the entire dynamic of the situation). There's also the possibility that North Korea's army might choose to defect in large quantities and/or carry out a coup instead of really go to war. They certainly know what any serious conflict would lead to, and I have to imagine that their loyalty might falter knowing that if they were to do something to change the situation on their end, they could do a lot to change the outcome.

You should see Nixon by Nixon, then

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi0jP4CBsc0

holy crap whole thing is on youtube...not sure if that is legal.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3889036/

I couldn't stop telling myself the same throughout. It's rather staggering.

Nixon epitomizes the "modern" consummate politician (seriously we need to start making politician be the worst insult you can call someone, like how people joke about lawyers being scum of the Earth but even worse, it needs to be a dirtier word than all slurs, and if they take offense then tell real politicians that they have the much more apt "public representative/servant" to remind them of their fucking place). He set the blueprint, that thankfully most have only been able to do pale imitation of, unfortunately we seem to have a whole political party intent on making him look tame.

It actually makes me almost think less of Futurama and how they made him into a silly almost folksy character, head-in-a-jar Nixon was actually entertaining and kinda likeable. Real Nixon was a fucking psychopath. But he at least knew how to put on a facsimile of Presidency at various times in public. I say almost think less, because Futurama's depiction likely would send real Nixon into a fit of rage, that he's basically a bumbling dick-head (badump-tsh) cartoon character, played for laughs in an American society that both views him as a joke and a monster (such that we at the time couldn't fathom that we'd ever have such a similarly unhinged President).

Another thing that gets me is that Eisenhower was actually good friends with him. I really have to wonder what he would have thought of Nixon in later years and as President.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WT

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
That's exactly wrong about what we need to do.

We need to say that politicians need to be of a very high standard, a noble calling, uncorruptable, serving the public interest, and deserve our appreciation - and then point out that very few come close to that standard today and demand radical change, both in the personnel and the systemic problems - caused by the radical right Supreme Court - that have got us to this situation.

Simply saying politicians are scum will do nothing do fix the problem or make the position attractive to good people. It will help normalize the problem and leave it as-is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thebobo

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
"Pretty much any time I interview a Democratic political activist or officeholder over the age of 60 and ask them why they got into politics, they mention Kennedy and his call to service. The Peace Corps, the space program, his speeches, and more are frequently mentioned as inspiring a generation of young people to get involved in politics and see government as a noble calling.

This sort of inspirational quality is rare among presidents—or anyone, really—and is difficult to quantify. But it shouldn't be dismissed. Kennedy's rhetoric and approach inspired people and continues to do so today. We could dismiss all this as just an exercise in branding, but it's very good branding. And if it's used to encourage people to try to improve the world in some way, that's hardly wasted effort."

https://psmag.com/news/revisiting-john-f-kennedys-legacy-100-years-after-his-birth
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,672
136
"Pretty much any time I interview a Democratic political activist or officeholder over the age of 60 and ask them why they got into politics, they mention Kennedy and his call to service. The Peace Corps, the space program, his speeches, and more are frequently mentioned as inspiring a generation of young people to get involved in politics and see government as a noble calling.

This sort of inspirational quality is rare among presidents—or anyone, really—and is difficult to quantify. But it shouldn't be dismissed. Kennedy's rhetoric and approach inspired people and continues to do so today. We could dismiss all this as just an exercise in branding, but it's very good branding. And if it's used to encourage people to try to improve the world in some way, that's hardly wasted effort."

https://psmag.com/news/revisiting-john-f-kennedys-legacy-100-years-after-his-birth

I value the Peace corps more than our armed forces in many cases. I greatly respect the peace Corps volunteers and veterans, their service is should be honored as we do our veterans imo. Also for individuals joining, traveling and living amongst different cultures in different parts of the world will help make you a more rounded individual.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Too bad we didn't have the good sense to elect the first Peace Corps leader Vice-President when we had the chance, in 1972 - we wouldn't have had Watergate and would have had a lot more good policies. Instead we got more pushing the country to unlimited money allowed in politics.
 

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,410
1,617
136
I am disappointed this is not on amazon instant or something. I was only halfway through EP1 :(
Yep, Amazon Prime Fire TV stick using Amazon Prime account meant I had to pay for it. So, I shut off the TV and went to the computer and watched it for free.
 

McLovin

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2007
1,911
58
91
The whole backstory on the US involvement in French colonialism is new to me.

Curious, what did you family tell you about the war?

Sorry for the Necro. I am watching this series currently and I enjoy the discussions here on subjects like this.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Curious, what did you family tell you about the war?

Sorry for the Necro. I am watching this series currently and I enjoy the discussions here on subjects like this.

I've been learning a lot more about the war - confirming it was a wrong war that killed millions for no good reason but a misguided pursuit of power.

I'm reading Daniel Ellseberg's "Secrets", and recommend it highly - an amazing inside view of the war's start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thebobo