Vic
Elite Member
- Jun 12, 2001
- 50,422
- 14,337
- 136
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: alchemize
What I find even more funny is that you're more concerned with what "right wingers" might be doing rather than the criticisms of the plan, which is basically the same plan the Bush admin had.Originally posted by: eskimospy
What I find funny is that if Obama did what Krugman wants him to do, this board would be exploding with right wingers shrieking about socialism and nationalization. Methinks some people are just looking for reasons to cry no matter what.
from my link:
So why isn't the Obama administration pushing for FDIC receivership? "Political influence of big banks," the economist says.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
There are lots of reasons why Obama isn't nationalizing the banks, and yes I imagine a bunch of them are political ones. I happen to agree with Krugman, I think we should be spending more on stimulus and we should be forcibly cleaning up these fucked up institutions. It doesn't mean that I don't find the criticisms coming from PJ and others incredibly dishonest though.
Are you telling me that you want Obama to do this? That you wouldn't screech "SOCIALISM" if he did it?
But Obama is teh socialist!!