Patriot Inferno vs. Crucial C300

[earls]

Thoughts? Benches?

Roughly the same price, C300 is slightly cheaper, but has slower write... Much faster read (355 vs. 285) if you have SATA III - hard to come back in laptop. :/

Thanks!

 

[flamenko]

Just completed a review of the C300 below (64Gb) in both SATA2 and SATA3 mode if it will help you at all. There are plenty of benches to look through from all of the common software.

 

[SithSolo1]

I just got the Inferno, so far is doing well but it was a spur of the moment thing without looking at alternatives. Had I taken the time to look around I probably would have gone with the C300.

 

[earls]

I suppose this says it all:

http://benchmarkreviews.com/images/reviews/storage/PI100GS25SSDR/ATTO-Disk-Benchmark_Results.png

SATA2: Inferno

SATA3: C300

 

[flamenko]

Gotta remember though that test is comparing the SATA 3 crucial with the SATA 2 Inferno. If u are not upgrading your hardware you wont be arriving at that score.

 

[Mark_K]

Gotta remember though that test is comparing the SATA 3 crucial with the SATA 2 Inferno. If u are not upgrading your hardware you wont be arriving at that score.

What if you add an ASUS SATA III add on card to your MOBO?
Have you tested tis yet?

 

[flamenko]

Nope... if anyone wants to get one to me I will test away....