Patch your machines - serious MS vulnerability

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

gwlam12

Diamond Member
Apr 4, 2001
6,946
1
71
wouldnt u guys rather have MS warn u of a vulnerability, than have some guy exploit the vulnerability AND THEN have MS write the patch?
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: mrCide
as a network admin I AM FED UP WITH UPDATES THAT REQUIRE A REBOOT

haha, sooooooooooooo true.

atleast your os is now so stable that you reboot so infrequently that it becomes a burden to:p
 

Sid59

Lifer
Sep 2, 2002
11,879
3
81
did the ALL patch stuff for both machines ..

i was trying to wait out for SP2 but that's not coming out soon.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Just downloaded 5.3MB of updates...took it about 15 minutes to do the installation after downloading!! :Q

WTF?!
 

ndee

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
12,680
1
0
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: Kristi2k
Originally posted by: cashman
Ugh, I was patching computers with this sh!t all damn Monday. Fvcking Microsh!t.

Why are there so many ignorant comments like this? Big deal, you have a job. I had to apply a similar patch (sneakernet) to about 200 PC's.


I too am wondering how many ignorant comments about Microsoft we are going to hear.

the problem is that we have a very important Server which is in use 24/7, we cannot just reboot the machine. I hate microsoft for making us reboot the machines, not that they are providing us patches.
 

draggoon01

Senior member
May 9, 2001
858
0
0
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: Kristi2k
Originally posted by: cashman
Ugh, I was patching computers with this sh!t all damn Monday. Fvcking Microsh!t.

Why are there so many ignorant comments like this? Big deal, you have a job. I had to apply a similar patch (sneakernet) to about 200 PC's.


I too am wondering how many ignorant comments about Microsoft we are going to hear.

the problem is that we have a very important Server which is in use 24/7, we cannot just reboot the machine. I hate microsoft for making us reboot the machines, not that they are providing us patches.


is it possible to do it any other way? can linux update without rebooting?
 

GermyBoy

Banned
Jun 5, 2001
3,524
0
0
Originally posted by: BlackOmen
Originally posted by: XZeroII Major linux vulnerability! Everyone running linux, download this patch, untar it, patch your machine, recompile your kernel... oh wait. No one uses Linux at home! :eek:
Sure there are people using it at home. To properly end your troll (I mean post) you should have said "Oh wait, there are very few kernel level vulnerabilities in Linux." Edit: CorpRec beat me to the troll statement

Of course there aren't. That's what happens when a hippie with a computer steals and renames a widely used OS in the university world and tries to market it for home use.

Windows has so many holes because they copied apple macintosh by looking at the software, not at the code. :p
 

arcenite

Lifer
Dec 9, 2001
10,660
7
81
The only product that microsoft could ever make that wouldn't suck is a vacuum...

Bill
 

XZeroII

Lifer
Jun 30, 2001
12,572
0
0
Originally posted by: BlackOmen
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Major linux vulnerability! Everyone running linux, download this patch, untar it, patch your machine, recompile your kernel... oh wait. No one uses Linux at home! :eek:


Sure there are people using it at home. To properly end your troll (I mean post) you should have said "Oh wait, there are very few kernel level vulnerabilities in Linux."

Edit: CorpRec beat me to the troll statement

Well sure. If you think that linux is only a kernel and nothing else, then yes it might be a bit more secure. But then you have to treat windows as simply a kernel as well. Then you have to adjust your numbers to make up for the differences in the number of users. People have done this and discovered that Linux is actually more insecure than windows. Of course you will just say that those studies are all biased and microsoft paid them to say that and bla bla bla. And yes, all 4 of you people who actually use Linux at home...I'm sure you're all running very secure machines.
 

juiio

Golden Member
Feb 28, 2000
1,433
4
81
Originally posted by: cashman
Ugh, I was patching computers with this sh!t all damn Monday. Fvcking Microsh!t.

Why not turn auto-update on once and never do that again?
 

ndee

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
12,680
1
0
Originally posted by: draggoon01
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: Kristi2k
Originally posted by: cashman
Ugh, I was patching computers with this sh!t all damn Monday. Fvcking Microsh!t.

Why are there so many ignorant comments like this? Big deal, you have a job. I had to apply a similar patch (sneakernet) to about 200 PC's.


I too am wondering how many ignorant comments about Microsoft we are going to hear.

the problem is that we have a very important Server which is in use 24/7, we cannot just reboot the machine. I hate microsoft for making us reboot the machines, not that they are providing us patches.


is it possible to do it any other way? can linux update without rebooting?

yes, you just restart the service and normally, you're done.
 

Medea

Golden Member
Dec 5, 2000
1,606
0
0
[I didn't read all of the pages for this thread so sorry if this is mentioned earlier.]

What's really getting annoying is that M$ now is embarassed to release critical updates so frequently, so they wait until they can release them in one lump. I don't remember if they stated the frequency of the releases when they issued a press release about it but, from what I've noticed, it seems to be about every 2 and 1/2 to 3 weeks. This really pisses me off because end users can be without a critical update for a couple of weeks before a patch is released.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT: I wonder if people can get monetary relief via a class action for M$ having released such an insecure OS which has caused people and companies money in fixing systems that have crashed because of vunerabilities as well as losing important and valuable data.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Medea
[I didn't read all of the pages for this thread so sorry if this is mentioned earlier.]

What's really getting annoying is that M$ now is embarassed to release critical updates so frequently, so they wait until they can release them in one lump. I don't remember if they stated the frequency of the releases when they issued a press release about it but, from what I've noticed, it seems to be about every 2 and 1/2 to 3 weeks. This really pisses me off because end users can be without a critical update for a couple of weeks before a patch is released.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT: I wonder if people can get monetary relief via a class action for M$ having released such an insecure OS which has caused people and companies money in fixing systems that have crashed because of vunerabilities as well as losing important and valuable data.

Ever read the end user license agreement? MS can probably have your first born because you clicked "I Agree"
:)
 

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Originally posted by: Lithium381
i've got 98 still, buahhaha



What are you laughing at? You aren't even supported anymore. This happens to you and there's no alert or patch...... you are just SOL.
 

MaxDepth

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2001
8,757
43
91
Just got a network system-wide IM notice that we are not to open any email files that contain files marked as "paypal.com." Must be a worm inside our system.
 

ChefJoe

Platinum Member
Jan 5, 2002
2,506
0
0
http://forums.winxpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=7807&foo=New%20Microsoft%20Patches%20Causing%20Problems.%2011--17

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1382912,00.asp

The Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer, which addresses numerous security flaws in Internet Explorer 6, introduces bugs involving the scrollbar. After the patch is applied, the page scrolls up or down twice when the user clicks once in the empty areas of the scrollbar. Clicking on the scrollbar arrows or dragging the scrollbar thumb works correctly.


-----
Glad to know it's not something that I messed up in my XP machine. I noticed this happening within the past few days and figured my MX duo was acting up.