After PM 6, I won't use Powerquest products anymore. They really push how PM eliminates the need to back up everything before repartitioning, but its not true. In addition, they have stopped updating products and failed to notify registered customers when routine Windows updates rendered their product dangerous.
PM 4 trashed one of my hard drives and they quickly put out a patch before the original PM 4 even had time to get cold on the shelves. Good that they released a patch but it makes a joke out of the statements about not needing to do backups.
PM 6 trashed a drive after Win2K SR2 was applied. It seems that Powerquest knew about this but didn't email registered users. And now they apparently have a policy of not doing updates any more. If you look at the update page you will see that there were multiple updates for PM 4, one for PM 5 (Win2K support) and NONE for PM6 although ther are still thousands of users who don't even realize the next time they use it it could destroy their drives. In fact, it seems apparent that the main reason they didn't update PM 6 to work with Win2K SR2 was because doing so would also make it work with XP. So bug fixes are now "upgrades". Remember that the the big selling point of PM 7 is XP support. How will you like it when an XP update breaks PM 7 and Powerquest won't fix it, or tell you about it, or have a new release until XP's successor comes along? In case you are wondering, no I did not lose anything (except hours restoring everything) when PM trashed my disks twice; I just think Powerquest has gone way down hill since the early days and PM is now an iffy product with terrible support.