- Nov 20, 1999
- 22,994
- 779
- 126
LMAO, law enforcement must be having a field day with this information. These TrumpTards are F****ed
This was in one of the previous threads.
The only bummer is I don't think any of this data is permissible as evidence in court as it was obtained illegally (IANAL)
I agree.
But this was originally posted in a open forum.
So i dont think it would matter.
This was in one of the previous threads.
The only bummer is I don't think any of this data is permissible as evidence in court as it was obtained illegally (IANAL)
I thought they could use illegally obtained data as long as they were involved in getting bit and they can verify the accuracy of it?This was in one of the previous threads.
The only bummer is I don't think any of this data is permissible as evidence in court as it was obtained illegally (IANAL)
IalsoANAL but, the way I understand it, it can be used as evidence in court if it was obtained by civilians rather than by governmental agencies. The civilians can be prosecuted for any crimes they commit while obtaining it, but it could be used in court.
![]()
Searches by Private Citizens
Evidence that private citizens find—even illegally—is usually admissible in court.www.nolo.com
Someone made a form on Parler that asked for name and other info plus any crime they might have committed on the 6th so that Trump could pardon them. Apparently some people have filled it out.