Perhaps if you didn't spend so much time communicating with your thumbs, you could form a more coherent argument.
this isn't insulting in any capacity. i don't think you realize that, though.
My point was children need to develop mentally and socially before introducing additional layers and complexity to their communication skills. Three years old is too young.
how are you in any way qualified to make such a statement? this is pure bullshit conjecture. my kids could actually navigate an ipad in an intelligent way at 10 months old. three year olds are way, way more advanced. i'm starting to think you've never been around a child at all or, if you have, you weren't paying attention. my four year old daughter can read, add and subtract, and she's starting to multiply. since you obviously have no clue what's normal for a kid, that's extremely advanced for a four year old. my wife is responsible for her knowing how to do those things, but she practiced constantly on an ipad, which cemented the learning and i'm equally as sure she's better at all of it as a result. she's enabled to learn on her own and now she feels more confident that she can learn advanced concepts. i see it daily.
Perhaps you could also teach your children how to feed themselves, you know, just in case. :whiste:
this doesn't even make sense. my kids have been feeding themselves since they were 1 and they were both potty trained early. what else did i miss since you clearly know everything about my kids? how the fuck does this have anything to do with using an ipad or computer? that's right, it doesn't. you started with saying kids need to go outside and socialize and now you're criticizing a kid i don't have who apparently can't feed himself because both of mine do that just fine.
it was already obvious in earlier posts, but this one really provided a high contrast view of how retarded your lack of an argument truly is.