• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Panel says no Iraq/Qaeda link

THe VP needs to go to the 9/11 Panel and set them straight. The 1 or 2 Sarin shells proves that he was right on the massive stockpiles of WMD, so he's obviously right on Saddam's Al Quida ties.
 
Originally posted by: fwtong
THe VP needs to go to the 9/11 Panel and set them straight. The 1 or 2 Sarin shells proves that he was right on the massive stockpiles of WMD, so he's obviously right on Saddam's Al Quida ties.
Click to expand...

Sarcasm? (hard to tell over the internet)
 
Well, now it's time for the military to fullfill their oath to the constitution,
comes home today and storm DC for sitting them out in some godforsaken desert for over a year killing innocents.
Maybe a few cluster bombs outside of the whitehouse will wake bush up hehe
Cut to Bush being led out of the WH in handcuffs
"But JESUS TOLD ME to make war on Iraqis HE TOLD ME OSAMA WAS PART OF IT...
C'mon guys why can't we just go back inside and do a line together and i'll explain just what jesus told me."
"It's OK Mr. President wer'e putting you somewhere safe from osama and jesus."
"Rummy SAVE ME!! You told me once we had their money they couldn't do this!! I WANT MY DADDY!!!"
 
Like our VP does not have a agenda. Mr. Haliburton has no agenda? The so-called VP there has the biggest agenda of them all to keep guns to the iraqi heads while Pumping for Dollars.
The scam is up soon. The reality is up to you to accept it or not.
Hiding their heads in the sand sniffing for oil isn't going to work much longer the world and half of this country (most likely more of it) have known this, and hopefully will stop these crooks from taking further advantage of the sheep before more people die.
 
Originally posted by: steeplerot
Like our VP does not have a agenda. Mr. Haliburton has no agenda? VP there is has the biggest agenda of them all to keep guns to the iraqi heads while Pumping for Dollars.
The scam is up soon. The reality is up to you to accept it or not.
Hiding their heads in the sand sniffing for oil isn't going to work much longer the world and half of this country (most likely more of it) have known this, and hopefully will stop these crooks from taking further advantage of the sheep before more people die.
Click to expand...

None of that can be true. If it was true George Bush would have taken some action against him. He is a man of character and integrity, and would never let this happen. Besides all that is conspiracy theory stuff.
 
Note from Bush,
Dear fellow Texan and patriot,
wake up to reality
and get your head out of my a$$
your getting in the way of corprate butt kissing.
Your fearless leader/prophet of jesus,
W.
 
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
Originally posted by: steeplerot
Like our VP does not have a agenda. Mr. Haliburton has no agenda? VP there is has the biggest agenda of them all to keep guns to the iraqi heads while Pumping for Dollars.
The scam is up soon. The reality is up to you to accept it or not.
Hiding their heads in the sand sniffing for oil isn't going to work much longer the world and half of this country (most likely more of it) have known this, and hopefully will stop these crooks from taking further advantage of the sheep before more people die.
Click to expand...

None of that can be true. If it was true George Bush would have taken some action against him. He is a man of character and integrity, and would never let this happen. Besides all that is conspiracy theory stuff.
Click to expand...

Again, tough to tell if that's sarcastic or not, what with the internet and all.
 
It's sarcasm based on Tommy's posts in OT I believe. That said, I wonder where all the rest of the sheep who kept bleating on about Iaq/Qaeda link went.
 
However, the commission said in a staff report, "We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States."
Click to expand...

The above are the key words in all of this.

This we already knew because the Bush administration said Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.

However a link can be drawn between Saddam and Osama Bin Ladens network. Bin Ladens 2nd in command was in an Iraqi state run hospital following an injury sustained in Afghanistan. He was offered room and board from Saddams govt and medical attention. It doesnt draw a hard link but if you think these two werent in some form or another communicating you are being naive.

I always find some questions rather baffling.

Furthermore, the newspaper quoted commission chairman Thomas Kean as saying "there was a lot of chaos" in the White House response. It said commission members wanted to know why Bush was allowed to continue meeting with Florida schoolchildren after the attacks were known, and why Bush hopscotched around the country on Air Force One before returning to Washington.
Click to expand...

Does it really take a genius to figure out that after an airplane was flown into DC and crashed inthe the pentagon that maybe it wasnt terribly wise to go there until things have stabilized?
 
Uhh...the attacks in Afghanistan were AFTER the 9/11 attacks. That only shows that some in Iraq were willing to give him medical aid. It doesn't prove the Iraqi gov't, much less Saddam himself, had any hand in that treatment.
 
Originally posted by: Genx87
However a link can be drawn between Saddam and Osama Bin Ladens network. Bin Ladens 2nd in command was in an Iraqi state run hospital following an injury sustained in Afghanistan. He was offered room and board from Saddams govt and medical attention. It doesnt draw a hard link but if you think these two werent in some form or another communicating you are being naive.
Click to expand...
this is what's known as a "scintilla" of evidence. it's like a sliver of a sliver.
Also, regarding your conclusion, "in some form or another communicating" does not equal "supporting," "contributing," or "acting as patron to."
 
This panel must be conspiring with with alqueda to produce such frivilous assertions. I think we should have another panel investigate this panel.
 
Originally posted by: Genx87
However, the commission said in a staff report, "We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States."
Click to expand...

The above are the key words in all of this.

This we already knew because the Bush administration said Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.

However a link can be drawn between Saddam and Osama Bin Ladens network. Bin Ladens 2nd in command was in an Iraqi state run hospital following an injury sustained in Afghanistan. He was offered room and board from Saddams govt and medical attention. It doesnt draw a hard link but if you think these two werent in some form or another communicating you are being naive.

I always find some questions rather baffling.
Click to expand...

In that case, if it true that Bush flew the BinLadin family out of the US after 9/11 you could draw a link between them two as well. Just b/c he got medical aid in Iraq doesn't prove anything.
 
Panel says no Iraq/Qaeda link
Click to expand...
just to set the record straight, that is definitely NOT what the article states the panel has said...

the exact wording of what the article says has an entirely different meaning than what you claim it means.

check it out and you'll see i'm correct.
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A study shows that the majority of members that made up the 9/11 Commission also agree that they do not want to see Bush reelected. When asked who they want to see elected in November, over 60% said Kerry. And when asked if they would do anything in their power to get Kerry elected, the same percentage said Yes.
 
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Panel says no Iraq/Qaeda link
Click to expand...
just to set the record straight, that is definitely NOT what the article states the panel has said...

the exact wording of what the article says has an entirely different meaning than what you claim it means.

check it out and you'll see i'm correct.
Click to expand...

This morning, when I posted the article, that was the title of it. If they changed it since then, not my problem.
 
Originally posted by: Genx87
However, the commission said in a staff report, "We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States."
Click to expand...
The above are the key words in all of this.

This we already knew because the Bush administration said Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.
Click to expand...

This is true. Unfortunately, George ForAgainst Bush also said there was a connection. In writing. To Congress:
  • Presidential Letter

    Text of a Letter from the President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate


    March 18, 2003


    Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President: )

    Consistent with section 3(b) of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243), and based on information available to me, including that in the enclosed document, I determine that:

    (1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic and other peaceful means alone will neither (A) adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq nor (B) likely lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and

    (2) acting pursuant to the Constitution and Public Law 107-243 is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

    Sincerely,

    GEORGE W. BUSH
    Click to expand...
Straight from the horse's, err, mouth.



However a link can be drawn between Saddam and Osama Bin Ladens network. Bin Ladens 2nd in command was in an Iraqi state run hospital following an injury sustained in Afghanistan. He was offered room and board from Saddams govt and medical attention. It doesnt draw a hard link but if you think these two werent in some form or another communicating you are being naive.

I always find some questions rather baffling.
Click to expand...
Can you document this claim? Not just the fact he was in a hospital, but your claim he was offered room and board and medical attention by the Iraqi government?
 
Originally posted by: Rob9874
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A study shows that the majority of members that made up the 9/11 Commission also agree that they do not want to see Bush reelected. When asked who they want to see elected in November, over 60% said Kerry. And when asked if they would do anything in their power to get Kerry elected, the same percentage said Yes.
Click to expand...

Did they say that before or after the investigation? If they said it after it's no surprise, who would want a deceiver to remain in office?
 
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Panel says no Iraq/Qaeda link
Click to expand...
just to set the record straight, that is definitely NOT what the article states the panel has said...

the exact wording of what the article says has an entirely different meaning than what you claim it means.

check it out and you'll see i'm correct.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I pointed that out in one of the other threads on this.🙂

CkG
 
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Panel says no Iraq/Qaeda link
Click to expand...
just to set the record straight, that is definitely NOT what the article states the panel has said...

the exact wording of what the article says has an entirely different meaning than what you claim it means.

check it out and you'll see i'm correct.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I pointed that out in one of the other threads on this.🙂

CkG
Click to expand...


So, show the link between Saddam and Al Queda, and while at it show the WMDs Cheney and Rummy knew about before the war.

Oops, can't do that can ya? 😛

Oh yeah, national security.

We have to have a war, but we can't show you why.

This war = optional.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top