Originally posted by: dawp
I'm surprised that none of the righties have chirped in here saying it's her god given right to pull the wool over our eyes.
Originally posted by: dawp
I'm surprised that none of the righties have chirped in here saying it's her god given right to pull the wool over our eyes.
Originally posted by: Vic
WTF. That is woefully ignorant of someone running for that high an office.
And that Tito the Builder implied the same thing as well on Hannity, that the 1st amendment somehow places a burden on the media for full and fair reporting, a la Fairness Doctrine but even applying to print media.
IOW, they're arguing the exact opposite of the 1st amendment, that govt should be allowed to control the media, and what it can and cannot report. That's disturbing, to say the least, and genuinely socialist if I may so.
Originally posted by: JSt0rm01
Originally posted by: dawp
I'm surprised that none of the righties have chirped in here saying it's her god given right to pull the wool over our eyes.
What can they say. Even butterbean can't argue for her on this one.
Originally posted by: silent tone
Oh well, so she's not a constitutional scholar. Fortunately, she "knows more about energy than probably anyone else in the United States of America". That's going to pay off in spades when we solve the energy shortage with offshore drilling.
There is not a straight talk express bus big enough for the truth this duo brings.
Originally posted by: Vic
WTF. That is woefully ignorant of someone running for that high an office.
And that Tito the Builder implied the same thing as well on Hannity, that the 1st amendment somehow places a burden on the media for full and fair reporting, a la Fairness Doctrine but even applying to print media.
IOW, they're arguing the exact opposite of the 1st amendment, that govt should be allowed to control the media, and what it can and cannot report. That's disturbing, to say the least, and genuinely socialist if I may so.
Originally posted by: eskimospy
People keep saying she's going to run in 2012. I hope to god this is true. Partially for the fact that the Republicans will get utterly destroyed if they pick her as their candidate, but mostly for the comedy.
Originally posted by: Dari
She probably knew what she was saying
but wasn't thinking.
Originally posted by: Dari
I pray to G-d that moderate Republicans do the right thing on November 4th.
Thank you!! It seems as if labeling something as "socialist"is the latest perjorative.Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Vic
WTF. That is woefully ignorant of someone running for that high an office.
And that Tito the Builder implied the same thing as well on Hannity, that the 1st amendment somehow places a burden on the media for full and fair reporting, a la Fairness Doctrine but even applying to print media.
IOW, they're arguing the exact opposite of the 1st amendment, that govt should be allowed to control the media, and what it can and cannot report. That's disturbing, to say the least, and genuinely socialist if I may so.
Its actually authoritarian in nature, not socialist. Much different.
I find it funny that she is more or less arguing that the press should stop reporting what they are due to discounting her words. She is actually making an argument to suspend free speech, that is just mind boggling.
Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: abaez
http://blogs.abcnews.com/polit...0/palin-fears-med.html
"If [the media] convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations," Palin told host Chris Plante, "then I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media."
Wow.. I know I'm supposed to provide some commentary, but I really don't know what to say..
So commenting on something she is saying is suppressing first amendment rights? Let me guess, she doesn't think they should say that? Oh the irony...
Originally posted by: eskimospy
People keep saying she's going to run in 2012. I hope to god this is true. Partially for the fact that the Republicans will get utterly destroyed if they pick her as their candidate, but mostly for the comedy.