• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Palin Stumps for Trump - Track Arrested for Domestic Violence

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Palin will be Trumps downfall. it would be the equivalent of Hitler invading Russia.
We've heard this (well, similar) about Trump before.

Right now his battle is with Cruz and not Carson or Jeb!, as they've lost their luster recently. Who knows though, maybe it does doom him long-term.
 
Sarah Palin appeared to suggest Wednesday that her son's arrest this week on*domestic violence charges stemmed*from the effects of PTSD*as a soldier and blamed President Obama for not providing adequate care for veterans.

That's rich coming from someone like her.
 
Sarah Palin appeared to suggest Wednesday that her son's arrest this week on*domestic violence charges stemmed*from the effects of PTSD*as a soldier and blamed President Obama for not providing adequate care for veterans.

That's rich coming from someone like her.

Agreed, she also wedged a we need to let the military fight the way they want & keep politics out. Here is my opinion.
1) her son was in Bush's war
2) Obama hasn't deployed mass numbers of troops
3) I fail to see how letting the military fight the way they want eliminates PTSD
4) Obama definitely dropped the ball on VA oversight but a Republican tea partiers like her led sequester cuts so all hands are dirty
5) most PTSD is drinking, drugs or depression unlike what appeared to happen here.
 
Agreed, she also wedged a we need to let the military fight the way they want & keep politics out. Here is my opinion.
1) her son was in Bush's war
2) Obama hasn't deployed mass numbers of troops
3) I fail to see how letting the military fight the way they want eliminates PTSD
4) Obama definitely dropped the ball on VA oversight but a Republican tea partiers like her led sequester cuts so all hands are dirty
5) most PTSD is drinking, drugs or depression unlike what appeared to happen here.

re point 5:

"Combat veterans are responsible for almost 21 percent of domestic violence nationwide, linked to the development of post traumatic stress disorder."

http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/High-risk-of-military-domestic-violence-on-the-5377562.php
 
Does no one else hear what an idiot SP is when she talks? It's worse than Bush 2. Since when did everyone in America care what stupid people say?
 
Time for the horrible misogyny of liberal idiots to emerge once again 🙂

“He is from the private sector, not a politician – can I get a ‘Hallelujah!’ Where, in the private sector, you actually have to balance budgets in order to prioritize, to keep the main thing, the main thing, and he knows the main thing: a president is to keep us safe economically and militarily. He knows the main thing, and he knows how to lead the charge. So troops, hang in there, because help’s on the way because he, better than anyone, isn’t he known for being able to command, fire!”
 
Sarah Palin appeared to suggest Wednesday that her son's arrest this week on*domestic violence charges stemmed*from the effects of PTSD*as a soldier and blamed President Obama for not providing adequate care for veterans.

That's rich coming from someone like her.

That's the party of personal responsibility for you.
 
Seriously though, did Bill Clinton advocate abstinence and family values? Where is the analogous fail with breath-taking hypocrisy?
I wonder if this person realizes that if Hitler says that murder is wrong that it is still wrong? I wonder if this person understands that advocating something and falling short of it isn't hypocrisy unless one says its A-OK when they do it?
 
I wonder if this person realizes that if Hitler says that murder is wrong that it is still wrong? I wonder if this person understands that advocating something and falling short of it isn't hypocrisy unless one says its A-OK when they do it?

Sarah, is that you??? Great imitation :thumbsup:
 
I wonder if any of these hypocrisy accusers ever have their children ever do something that they think is wrong?

To advocate any sort of morality one must have their children comply 100% or else they are hypocrites?
 
I wonder if any of these hypocrisy accusers ever have their children ever do something that they think is wrong?

To advocate any sort of morality one must have their children comply 100% or else they are hypocrites?

No, the one advocating (and getting paid to) the morals (Bristol P.) should believe and live it, would Christians still follow Jesus if they found out he was a hypocrite? ()🙂
 
Last edited:
I wonder if this person realizes that if Hitler says that murder is wrong that it is still wrong? I wonder if this person understands that advocating something and falling short of it isn't hypocrisy unless one says its A-OK when they do it?

They aren't "Falling short of it". They are also saying its A-OK when they do it, by their actions. When you go out and state abstinence and waiting for marriage for sexual activity and then go out and have unprotected sex and get pregnant without being married, that is hypocrisy. She doesn't have to physically say "Its ok if I do it", she is doing that clearly through her actions.
 
I wonder if any of these hypocrisy accusers ever have their children ever do something that they think is wrong?

To advocate any sort of morality one must have their children comply 100% or else they are hypocrites?
Hypocrites. You're using that word and attempting to argue something or other about it, but I do not think it means what you apparently think it means.


edit: since you'll likely still foolishly argue without attempting to understand what it means,

a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings. ... : a person who acts in a way that goes against what he or she claims to believe or feel

So, if someone states that "I don't think people should engage in premarital sex" and then engages in premarital sex, that EXACTLY fits the definition.
 
Back
Top