• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Palestinians Burn Synagogues as the Israelis leave

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
hhmm...guess you don't know history to well.

/\ useless post. I could simply say "you don't know what you're talking about" after ever post I disagree with too. Care to educate me where I've been egregiously misled?

Where you from? ^^

Washington DC, and I'm not Israeli, I'm American Indian.

Oops didn't mean to ask you, meant it for kogase.
 
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
Originally posted by: dahunan
I guess we should just feel good that the Pals never received tanks and jet fighter aircraft from the US too 😀

Well I didn't see Israeli?s dancing in the streets on 9-11.

True.. but you only had to be in New York to see ISRAELIS DANCING IN THE STREETS after the attacks..

So whatt is your point?

Do you have a link for that? I haven't heard about it, but I wouldn't be surprised if some did that since there are some whack job Israelis out there that you rarely hear about. However, I suppose the difference is that some people would believe that a larger percentage of Palestinians would be 'dancing' than Israelis.


http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html
http://ww1.sundayherald.com/37707
http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/06-07-05/discussion.cgi.20.html

I know they are not the best links but we know who owns the media and hollywood 😉

Those seem like whack job conspiracy theorist crap. Do you not have anything of substantial worth to link to? And you are saying that Israelis or Jews own the entire media and not a single piece of real news from any non-conspiracy theorist website can be found?

Personally, I find your last statement a complete cop out. You should be able to find real articles or papers criticizing Israel under other situations - yet now you can't find prove your conspiracy theory and you essentially blame it on those Israelis/Jews...how nice! What a nice position you're in - either way, you blame the Jews!
 
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
The Arab nations initiated four wars against Israel:

1948 War of Independence
1956 Sinai War
1967 Six Day War
1973 Yom Kippur War
Israel defended itself each time and won. After each war Israeli army withdrew from most of the areas it captured (see maps). (see Camp-David Accords). This is unprecedented in World history and shows Israel's willingness to reach peace even at the risk of fighting for its very existence each time anew.

Anonymous quote:

If the Arabs (Moslems) put down their weapons today there would be no more violence. If the Israelis put down their weapons today there would be no more Israel.
Think about it...

And the very state of Israel was created by Europe and America who wanted to get rid of the Jews (who they hated) in their countries, by violently uprooting the various Muslim tribes who lived in that area. The incoming Zionists soon proved more than capable of their own brutal, sadistic violence, however, and displaced whoever had the best land in favor of their bretheren, who lay claim to the land because... well, because the Torah just says so. Throughout the history of modern Israel, the people and government have established time and time again their contempt for the "subhuman" Palestinians, and have shown no hesitation or regret in sadistically stamping out dissent--not only the dissenters themselves, but any civilians who were unlucky enough to live near them.

Israels attempts at peace usually amount to something like a schoolyard bully (Israel) grabbing your (Palestinians) balls and squeezing real hard, while you desperately try to fight him off. The rest of the world looks at you from the comfort of their safe little homes and sniffs "look at those uncivilized ruffians", while casually massaging the bully's tired arm. Then the bully says to you "look at that, the world holds us in contempt, why do you continue to fight?". Meanwhile, the bully's version of "peace" is for you to just stop fighting back, shut up, and let him strangle your balls.
 
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
hhmm...guess you don't know history to well.

/\ useless post. I could simply say "you don't know what you're talking about" after ever post I disagree with too. Care to educate me where I've been egregiously misled?

Where you from? ^^

New York (actually born in Tennessee). It's in my profile.
 
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
The Arab nations initiated four wars against Israel:

1948 War of Independence
1956 Sinai War
1967 Six Day War
1973 Yom Kippur War
Israel defended itself each time and won. After each war Israeli army withdrew from most of the areas it captured (see maps). (see Camp-David Accords). This is unprecedented in World history and shows Israel's willingness to reach peace even at the risk of fighting for its very existence each time anew.

Anonymous quote:

If the Arabs (Moslems) put down their weapons today there would be no more violence. If the Israelis put down their weapons today there would be no more Israel.
Think about it...

And the very state of Israel was created by Europe and America who wanted to get rid of the Jews (who they hated) in their countries, by violently uprooting the various Muslim tribes who lived in that area. The incoming Zionists soon proved more than capable of their own brutal, sadistic violence, however, and displaced whoever had the best land in favor of their bretheren, who lay claim to the land because... well, because the Torah just says so. Throughout the history of modern Israel, the people and government have established time and time again their contempt for the "subhuman" Palestinians, and have shown no hesitation or regret in sadistically stamping out dissent--not only the dissenters themselves, but any civilians who were unlucky enough to live near them.

Israels attempts at peace usually amount to something like a schoolyard bully (Israel) grabbing your (Palestinians) balls and squeezing real hard, while you desperately try to fight him off. The rest of the world looks at you from the comfort of their safe little homes and sniffs "look at those uncivilized ruffians", while casually massaging the bully's tired arm. Then the bully says to you "look at that, the world holds us in contempt, why do you continue to fight?". Meanwhile, the bully's version of "peace" is for you to just stop fighting back, shut up, and let him strangle your balls.

Ahh nvm.
 
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
hhmm...guess you don't know history to well.

/\ useless post. I could simply say "you don't know what you're talking about" after ever post I disagree with too. Care to educate me where I've been egregiously misled?

Where you from? ^^

New York (actually born in Tennessee). It's in my profile.

An American defending Muslims? Am I seeing things?
 
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
hhmm...guess you don't know history to well.

/\ useless post. I could simply say "you don't know what you're talking about" after ever post I disagree with too. Care to educate me where I've been egregiously misled?

Where you from? ^^

New York (actually born in Tennessee). It's in my profile.

An American defending Muslims? Am I seeing things?

What's so rare about that? You must not keep in touch with recent history, too.
 
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
hhmm...guess you don't know history to well.

/\ useless post. I could simply say "you don't know what you're talking about" after ever post I disagree with too. Care to educate me where I've been egregiously misled?

Where you from? ^^

New York (actually born in Tennessee). It's in my profile.

An American defending Muslims? Am I seeing things?

What's so rare about that? You must not keep in touch with recent history, too.

I did a poor job of sarcasm is all 🙁.
 
focus on current events. its the same old lines getting repeated over and over again.

people on the side of Palestinians will say Israel stole the land, people on Israel's side will say the land belongs to Israel. i am a friend of both, so i will only wish best for them.

what gets me is that this was not a good sign from the Palestinians. it shows there are too many extremists living among them. Israel is showing that it wants to live in peace and is making sacrifices. i have yet to see that from the Arabs. and if you think Israel treats Palestinians any worse than what other Arab countries treat them, then its your loss.

about the dancing Arabs or Jews on 9/11, i would think that many many people in America and around the world were happy that day. many Americans i would say were happy seeing what they saw that day. it would not surprise me if many Arabs also danced. its just human nature.
 
Originally posted by: raildogg
what gets me is that this was not a good sign from the Palestinians. it shows there are too many extremists living among them. Israel is showing that it wants to live in peace and is making sacrifices. i have yet to see that from the Arabs. and if you think Israel treats Palestinians any worse than what other Arab countries treat them, then its your loss.
.

It's a silly symbolic gesture by the Palestinians, and as a result of their silliness they lost some perfectly good buildings. On the flip side, the original decision (by Israel) to leave those buildings standing was also a silly symbolic gesture, who's almost sole purpose was to incite the Palestinians.

Israel is finally doing something that seems genuinely goodwilled and in the spirit of true peace, but I have to remain skeptical. I'm going to wait a few years and see how this plays out before praising Israel for this.
 
and besides, isn't burning them faster than tearing them down? Aren't the Palestiny ppl just trying to save time?
 
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: raildogg
what gets me is that this was not a good sign from the Palestinians. it shows there are too many extremists living among them. Israel is showing that it wants to live in peace and is making sacrifices. i have yet to see that from the Arabs. and if you think Israel treats Palestinians any worse than what other Arab countries treat them, then its your loss.
.

It's a silly symbolic gesture by the Palestinians, and as a result of their silliness they lost some perfectly good buildings. On the flip side, the original decision (by Israel) to leave those buildings standing was also a silly symbolic gesture, who's almost sole purpose was to incite the Palestinians.

Israel is finally doing something that seems genuinely goodwilled and in the spirit of true peace, but I have to remain skeptical. I'm going to wait a few years and see how this plays out before praising Israel for this.

If they really wanna be good then they would give back all of the land 😀
 
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: raildogg
what gets me is that this was not a good sign from the Palestinians. it shows there are too many extremists living among them. Israel is showing that it wants to live in peace and is making sacrifices. i have yet to see that from the Arabs. and if you think Israel treats Palestinians any worse than what other Arab countries treat them, then its your loss.
.

It's a silly symbolic gesture by the Palestinians, and as a result of their silliness they lost some perfectly good buildings. On the flip side, the original decision (by Israel) to leave those buildings standing was also a silly symbolic gesture, who's almost sole purpose was to incite the Palestinians.

Israel is finally doing something that seems genuinely goodwilled and in the spirit of true peace, but I have to remain skeptical. I'm going to wait a few years and see how this plays out before praising Israel for this.

If they really wanna be good then they would give back all of the land 😀

Completely impractical at this point in time. For better or worse, the Israelis are there to stay, just like Americans (and American Indians).
 
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
The Arab nations initiated four wars against Israel:

1948 War of Independence
1956 Sinai War
1967 Six Day War
1973 Yom Kippur War
Israel defended itself each time and won. After each war Israeli army withdrew from most of the areas it captured (see maps). (see Camp-David Accords). This is unprecedented in World history and shows Israel's willingness to reach peace even at the risk of fighting for its very existence each time anew.

Anonymous quote:

If the Arabs (Moslems) put down their weapons today there would be no more violence. If the Israelis put down their weapons today there would be no more Israel.
Think about it...

And the very state of Israel was created by Europe and America who wanted to get rid of the Jews (who they hated) in their countries, by violently uprooting the various Muslim tribes who lived in that area. The incoming Zionists soon proved more than capable of their own brutal, sadistic violence, however, and displaced whoever had the best land in favor of their bretheren, who lay claim to the land because... well, because the Torah just says so. Throughout the history of modern Israel, the people and government have established time and time again their contempt for the "subhuman" Palestinians, and have shown no hesitation or regret in sadistically stamping out dissent--not only the dissenters themselves, but any civilians who were unlucky enough to live near them.

Israels attempts at peace usually amount to something like a schoolyard bully (Israel) grabbing your (Palestinians) balls and squeezing real hard, while you desperately try to fight him off. The rest of the world looks at you from the comfort of their safe little homes and sniffs "look at those uncivilized ruffians", while casually massaging the bully's tired arm. Then the bully says to you "look at that, the world holds us in contempt, why do you continue to fight?". Meanwhile, the bully's version of "peace" is for you to just stop fighting back, shut up, and let him strangle your balls.

hmm... a couple of Americans living on stolen Indian land talking about Jews stealing land. Hypocrisy at its best.
 
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Ok but you have to agree, burning down those buildings faster than tearing them down, yes?

I seriously doubt that's what was on the Palestinians' minds.

Edit: But yes, simply burning it down would be alot faster than bringing in the machines needed to demolish the buildings, although it depends what the buildings were made of, and how they were constructed.
 
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Ok but you have to agree, burning down those buildings faster than tearing them down, yes?
Clearly not the issue in many of these cases. The building were frequently made of brick so they have to be demolished with heavy equipment after the fires went out. This was about Palestinians wanting to deliberately defile Israeli Synagogues as a symbol of Israel.
 
Don?t be fooled by Israel?s withdrawal, it was not a gesture of peace; it was a strategic move to save their butts from a demographic disaster. If they annexed those settlements instead of withdrawing from them, Israel would end up with Arab majority. Map of Israel?s disengagement.

In the meantime Israel expands their settlements in places like Beitar Ilit , Malle Adumim and this year alone illegal settler number increased by twelve thousand (despite the recent pullout).
 
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Ok but you have to agree, burning down those buildings faster than tearing them down, yes?
Clearly not the issue in many of these cases. The building were frequently made of brick so they have to be demolished with heavy equipment after the fires went out. This was about Palestinians wanting to deliberately defile Israeli Synagogues as a symbol of Israel.

Though true, so what? if Israel didn't want to be defiled in this way, they'd have destroyed the buildings themselves. Hell, they had no problem destroying all the Homes, which the Palestinians may have accepted as a token gesture(maybe just destroyed them too, but who knows) of Good Will. So why should the Palestinians offer anything to the Israeli's?
 
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Ok but you have to agree, burning down those buildings faster than tearing them down, yes?
Clearly not the issue in many of these cases. The building were frequently made of brick so they have to be demolished with heavy equipment after the fires went out. This was about Palestinians wanting to deliberately defile Israeli Synagogues as a symbol of Israel.

If I were Israeli, I could care less what they did after I left. If I understand the situation correctly, the Israeli's did wreck all their homes before they left so nobody could use them and the American taxpayer is paying them all $200,000 to relocate. They could have wrecked their synagoges also, but they knew it wasn't nessecary for them to do that.

Maybe you think we should have paid them to tear down the their churches also??
 
It was linked to in an earlier thread that the settlement homes were destroyed at the request of the Palestinians. They plan on building higher density housing and such there instead of the regular single story homes with gardens.
 
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
It was linked to in an earlier thread that the settlement homes were destroyed at the request of the Palestinians. They plan on building higher density housing and such there instead of the regular single story homes with gardens.

I missed that link. Still, why did they tear down the houses and not the churches??
 
Back
Top