I agree with you, the penalty should not be a violent death. Point is they are stealing land and putting themselves in a vunerable position on land that is not theirs, hence they are legitimate targets. They should not be there.
Again, who's land are they stealing? Who's land was it? When did it become the Palestinians land? Who gave it to them? It was Turkish, then British.
Rubber bullets kill too, especially a head shot to a little kid. If you can deny that you are a crock.
Well, maybe they shouldn't try to throw rocks at armed troops on a mission. If they want to do that, it ain't gonna tickle. Not saying they should be killed, and they aren't. But these guys are not going to be carrying supersoakers. And maybe they shouldn't be bringing their five year old kid with them to violent demonstrations. They do, I've seen it. It makes for great press images.
Once again, that is your baseless opinion and you are completely entitled to it.
Again, please justify for me how they consider themselves in the right. They shoot men, women and children driving on the road. Infants in car seats.
You are both wrong because violence begets violence. If you are trying to portray the IDF as a peace loving gentle but firm group of chaps you are not going to be convincing anyone. The only way a human can treat another human the way the IDF treats Palestinians is by dehuminizing them, just like the Nazis did. The only way a Pal suicide bomber can do what he does is by dehumnizing the enemy, just like the Nazis did. Hence, IMO, they are both wrong.
No, they are not gentle. They're an army, they're not supposed to be gentle. They're supposed to kick ass. You're missing a big point. When the IDF goes in there, they are shot at, have rocks thrown at them, grendaes, etc. So of course they respond with force. They're soldiers. That's what soldiers do when they are attacked. If they dehumanize anyone, it's because they have to treat everyone like a suspected terrorist, because they terrorists themselves are Palestinian civillians. Is it fair to the innocent Palestinians? No. But the blame lies with the terrorists. They are the ones who bring it upon their own people.
You are right, skewed to the benefit of Israel. Try critisizing Israel here and you will be crucified as an Anti-Semite. In America, Israel is beyond reproach. Try being sympathetic to the Palestinians and run for office. You won't get past being head of your local neighbourhood watch if that. No one dares speak badly of our great friend in the ME.
Do you read the NY Times? Do you watch CNN? They are almost as bad as the BBC. So skewed to towards the Palestinians. And they are not the only ones.
You don't think the American media is friendly to Israel? What planet do you live on? Or are you one of those permanently self pitying people with a massive persecution complex?
See above.
I don't know what you were trying to imply. I was suggesting that Israel's brutality can only be sugar coated and overlooked by the US media and Gov. for so long. People around the world are repulsed by Israel's behavior, just as they were repulsed by that of the South Africans during apartheid, and yes, there is a lot of ground for comparison. Just ask any Israeli Arab AKA third class citizen holding an Israeli passport. I have.
ISRAEL'S brutality?! Is this a joke? Do you see Israelis intentionally blowing up busloads of children going to school? Or busloads of people coming from prayer? Or do you see them trying to kill the people that are murdering their innocent civillians? THAT'S what I'm implying.