Which one are you more aligned with? On immigration, I'm inbetween (i.e., I don't favor completely closing the borders but I don't support amnesty either), but on foreign policy I hold the non-interventionist pro-American sovereignty paleoconservative view held by Revolutionary Jefferson and Presidents Harding and Coolidge. On trade, I don't support either because paleocons support protectionism while neocons support managed trade via treaties. However, I'd rather have protectionism than globalism, because nationalism is easier to evade than globally managed trade. Paleocons are opposed to deficit spending as well as affirmative action whereas some neocons (Gingrich, Bush) are soft on affirmative action and they support deficit spending. Paleocons oppose federal intrusion into education while some neocons don't. Paleocons are completely against gun control, while neocons (like Bush, Santorum, Gingrich, and Romney) support it to a degree.
On things like abortion and the death penalty the two conservatisms are the same.
As a culturally conservative anarcho-confederalist, I'm more sympathetic to paleoconservatism by far.
On things like abortion and the death penalty the two conservatisms are the same.
As a culturally conservative anarcho-confederalist, I'm more sympathetic to paleoconservatism by far.