The Green Bean
Diamond Member
http://tribune.com.pk/story/315407/...rensic-evidence-of-haqqani-ijaz-conversation/
I don't know where I stand on this one. The Pakistanis claim this is a case of national security and if proven guilty, the former Pakistani ambassador and even the president himself may be charged with high treason. India, UAE and Saudi Arabia have agreements with RIM which allows them to access messenger logs. I don't know the details of the agreement, but would India be allowed to access a log of a conversation that took place in the USA?
If this was a matter of American national security where would you stand? What are the legal obligations on RIM in this case? Would they have to provide data at the behest of the Canadian government? Would the Canadians not be obliged to help the Pakistani authorities in investigating this case?
If Blackberry were to be banned in Pakistan, how bad would it hurt RIM? They are already struggling and Pakistani is quite a large market with 120 million cell phone users. How would they see this in a purely business perspective. They have already granted some countries access, why not another?
I don't know where I stand on this one. The Pakistanis claim this is a case of national security and if proven guilty, the former Pakistani ambassador and even the president himself may be charged with high treason. India, UAE and Saudi Arabia have agreements with RIM which allows them to access messenger logs. I don't know the details of the agreement, but would India be allowed to access a log of a conversation that took place in the USA?
If this was a matter of American national security where would you stand? What are the legal obligations on RIM in this case? Would they have to provide data at the behest of the Canadian government? Would the Canadians not be obliged to help the Pakistani authorities in investigating this case?
If Blackberry were to be banned in Pakistan, how bad would it hurt RIM? They are already struggling and Pakistani is quite a large market with 120 million cell phone users. How would they see this in a purely business perspective. They have already granted some countries access, why not another?
Last edited: