:roll: Dallas had a few issues last year, but in the end, they cooled off at the wrong time and the Giants got hot at the right time.  That's how football works.  Regardless, Dallas has worked in the offseason to improve those issues, the Giants got raided in free agency.  You can't count on seven draft picks contributing every year.  Are the Giants going to be a worse team this year than last?  Maybe, maybe not, but from a high level view, it sure seems Dallas improved, and the Giants regressed, in the offseason.
As for Pacman, is he "great"?  Eh, we'll see, but he was a first round pick and showed a lot of potential.  He is a good CB, and he IS a great return man.  He obviously wore out his welcome in Tennessee, you're a fool to think they don't miss his talent, even if they're glad to be rid of his antics.  It's a relatively risk free move for the Cowboys, they got him cheap, and there's a ton of upside there.  His performance on the field was never questioned.
Romo, as a quarterback, did not cost the Cowboys either playoff game.  Obviously he messed up the hold, but he never should have been holding for that kick anyway, and he doesn't anymore.  As a QB, he drove his team down to the 2 yard line with a minute to go, and were it not for a questionable challenge, he'd likely have gotten them the touchdown, too.  Last year was far from Romo's fault.  On that last drive, it was Patrick Crayton who blew it, not Romo.  The final stats are misleading, the pick came from a last minute hail mary.  Did he play lights out?  Nope, but he didn't cost them the game, either.  Is he Manning, Brady, or Palmer?  Of course not, but no one is.  Would I take him over Eli, or most other QBs in the league?  Definitely.
You're not even trying anymore.