Pack of 10 gorillas versus one male lion

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Just read along, it's a different kind of entertaining. Maybe not to everyone's taste. Join in even. You get exttra poince for misbelling words that ushually don't got misbelling.

lol Well, I did improve a bit from what I first started off with grammar and punctuation, as I can only get better as time goes along, its the same thing with music, I dont have to know how to read notes, know keys, letterings and all that jazz in order to make a guitar sound good, in verse I dont have to have a masters degree in the english grammar and punctuation to shatter your world in the L vs T debate, obviously it had a huge impact on you that won't in any time stop mind f00king you, yet petty insults about punctuation actually improves me in the long run, and I have some pretty thick skin...I can take it...

Can you?

Nah, you're the cry baby remember, you whine and cry like a bitch anytime I flame back.
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
lol Well, I did improve a bit from what I first started off with grammar and punctuation, as I can only get better as time goes along, its the same thing with music, I dont have to know how to read notes, know keys, letterings and all that jazz in order to make a guitar sound good, in verse I dont have to have a masters degree in the english grammar and punctuation to shatter your world in the L vs T debate, obviously it had a huge impact on you that won't in any time stop mind f00king you, yet petty insults about punctuation actually improves me in the long run, and I have some pretty thick skin...I can take it...

Wow.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
They are talking about the thickness of a fluid there not about its mass/volume.



Conversely a pencil sized piece of gold is heavier than a pencil sized bit of lead but still harder.

Where does it state that? It states below a consistency of a compact Solid.

Conversely doesn't change what I was implimenting, led is heavier, steel is harder at the same size...the end. It also goes on to mention, thickness, compactness, tightness, and more which all can relate to stronger and harder.

All you're doing at this point is begging for absolute or exact meanings, when one word can mean many things. its a bit annoying since, you're basicly a obsessed synonym troll, since you never stay on topic, and want to strut something thats medicore...I could follow you around other threads and point out every minor mistake you make and act like I had pre-known that from birth...yet you don't see me playing that silly game, thanks for the minor corrections, but we know you are just capatalizing on the ownage I gave you and your re-acuring troll groupies.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,553
11,700
136
Where does it state that? It states below a consistency of a compact Solid.

First part of that line; "Thickness of consistency; impenetrability." would imply a non solid.

Conversely doesn't change what I was implimenting, led is heavier, steel is harder at the same size...the end. It also goes on to mention, thickness, compactness, tightness, and more which all can relate to stronger and harder.

Thats just because lead is denser and softer than steel. It doesn't hold up for all solids. As I stated earlier gold is denser and harder than lead.

All you're doing at this point is begging for absolute or exact meanings, when one word can mean many things. its a bit annoying since, you're basicly a obsessed synonym troll, since you never stay on topic, and want to strut something thats medicore...I could follow you around other threads and point out every minor mistake you make and act like I had pre-known that from birth...yet you don't see me playing that silly game, thanks for the minor corrections, but we know you are just capatalizing on the ownage I gave you and your re-acuring troll groupies.

If you're going to use terms in a scientific way then they have very specific meanings. Things like "density", "random" and "mean" all have non negotiable meanings when you're using them in the way you were.

Its not me thats straying off topic, I was pointing out that your argument was very flawed in the way you were stating it. You can admit that and move on (and maybe learn a little) or you can continue arguing your incorrect stance and continue dragging things further off topic.

Also I've very much not been pointing out every minor mistake you've made, I really, really don't have the time or inclination to do that. What I have been doing is trying to see the meaning you've been trying to get to in your garbled posts and treat you like an adult. If you like I can just let everything go, shrug and just treat you like an idiot and not try to take you seriously?
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
First part of that line; "Thickness of consistency; impenetrability." would imply a non solid.



Thats just because lead is denser and softer than steel. It doesn't hold up for all solids. As I stated earlier gold is denser and harder than lead.



If you're going to use terms in a scientific way then they have very specific meanings. Things like "density", "random" and "mean" all have non negotiable meanings when you're using them in the way you were.

Its not me thats straying off topic, I was pointing out that your argument was very flawed in the way you were stating it. You can admit that and move on (and maybe learn a little) or you can continue arguing your incorrect stance and continue dragging things further off topic.

Also I've very much not been pointing out every minor mistake you've made, I really, really don't have the time or inclination to do that. What I have been doing is trying to see the meaning you've been trying to get to in your garbled posts and treat you like an adult. If you like I can just let everything go, shrug and just treat you like an idiot and not try to take you seriously?

Spoken like a true howlee,

First of all, I know what I am talking about in terms what I covered, I just mistakenly re-arange them by re-phrasing differently on accident, the same way I usually spell a word right and sometimes wrong... I call it lazy-ness, its not that I dont know how to spell it in the first place, sorry I fall short to the standards of your auto-spell-checker you suck on; again this is a off topic section of a forum non-related, if I was on a formal site being serious I would give a shit and properly adress it with caution...here, is just a free time lounge where I aint required to be accurate, with fucking anything...since 90% of people on forums in the lounge section arn't.

Why would you then deem a person as such an idiot? Just because I am medicore in its quality of what I'm getting at, since I use numerous correct synonyms and try to cover an aray as long as it seems similar, can't blame me for trying to broadin my vocab, learn, adapt and progress, I'm still in the vicinity of not being 100% wrong.

Scientifical way? Pfwa ha ha ha, scientifical doesn't make anything a absolute fact, the method of science is to keep questioning something until there is a mutual agreement or a accurate equation/formula that can be written, in other words question it, in no fucking way science is definite, since at a point and time scientist thought the world was flat, at that point and time it was passed on as fact, now...pure bullshit... a schallor scientist named professor haughton stated that tigers can grow to 18 feet long when now we know the longest was 12 feet, don't flaunt the term scientifical like it has a mathematical basis or any basis, its just opinions, which sounds like to me all you're giving is a un-educated twisting of facts opinion, so go get some more wiki sites like you're use to relying on as scientifical facts. Ha!

You don't wanna waste time?

Give me a fucking break, you were a complete 110% waste of time on the L vs T thread, hiding your sick and deluded purposes for following me around like I stepped in shit...you know you flys, how you love sucking on shit...thats all you do, is pray to god I come on so you can talk/redeem the hilarious humilation you got on that thread **cough cough** I ment talk about more accurate synonyms and eluding multiple meanings for individual words, you're a fucking joke and you know it.

Yeah adults cry like a fucking baby to the mods, saying vote for bann... when I haven't adressed you, nor do I want you adressing me, nor was I un-civil at the time, broke no rules; or gave off any bad vibes, yet you followed me buzzing like a horse fly at every post, some fucking adult, if it bothers you that much that ask them to ban me, forever, because thats the only way you'd truely have silence from me, I'm a adult... when I'm mad I vent, I don't let a mod stop me since they don't even up-hold there own guide lines and get rid of thread derailing losers like you, but knowing you, even if I am banned, you'd be like sxcolpz or what ever the fuck his name was and follow me to other forums despised by how bad you dumb assholes put the ownage upoun yourself.


If you look for trouble, than you just might find it.

Leave it be then, cause I'm sick of your contradicting, condesending, hypocritcal scared lying ass. You were owned on subject by not only me but countless of other people of even countless of other topics, yet all I have is the same cunts buzzing around having the same lame come-backs to hide there ownage and point minor details, when the initial or main substance is alot more gradifying, since we both know why you reply specifically to me, it aint so you can be a adult-noble and dignified, its because I made an ass out of you and you are a huge fucking cry baby sore loser about it, if anyone should man the fuck up its you, you twat.

You know what, I don't think I'll even come back, you can have your fun here, I'll move on and let you re-main in your world of butt-hurt...good luck, and try not to get too way up your ass, since you're bleeding asshole is evident in how much you and sxolpz stalk the hell out of me.

XD XD XD Tootles Bitch.
 
Last edited:

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,553
11,700
136
Spoken like a true howlee,

First of all, I know what I am talking about in terms what I covered, I just mistakenly re-arange them by re-phrasing differently on accident, the same way I usually spell a word right and sometimes wrong... I call it lazy-ness, its not that I dont know how to spell it in the first place, sorry I fall short to the standards of your auto-spell-checker you suck on; again this is a off topic section of a forum non-related, if I was on a formal site being serious I would give a shit and properly adress it with caution...here, is just a free time lounge where I aint required to be accurate, with fucking anything...since 90% of people on forums in the lounge section arn't.

Why would you then deem a person as such an idiot? Just because I am medicore in its quality of what I'm getting at, since I use numerous correct synonyms and try to cover an aray as long as it seems similar, can't blame me for trying to broadin my vocab, learn, adapt and progress, I'm still in the vicinity of not being 100% wrong.

Scientifical way? Pfwa ha ha ha, scientifical doesn't make anything a absolute fact, the method of science is to keep questioning something until there is a mutual agreement or a accurate equation/formula that can be written, in other words question it, in no fucking way science is definite, since at a point and time scientist thought the world was flat, at that point and time it was passed on as fact, now...pure bullshit... a schallor scientist named professor haughton stated that tigers can grow to 18 feet long when now we know the longest was 12 feet, don't flaunt the term scientifical like it has a mathematical basis or any basis, its just opinions, which sounds like to me all you're giving is a un-educated twisting of facts opinion, so go get some more wiki sites like you're use to relying on as scientifical facts. Ha!

You don't wanna waste time?

Give me a fucking break, you were a complete 110% waste of time on the L vs T thread, hiding your sick and deluded purposes for following me around like I stepped in shit...you know you flys, how you love sucking on shit...thats all you do, is pray to god I come on so you can talk/redeem the hilarious humilation you got on that thread **cough cough** I ment talk about more accurate synonyms and eluding multiple meanings for individual words, you're a fucking joke and you know it.

Yeah adults cry like a fucking baby to the mods, saying vote for bann... when I haven't adressed you, nor do I want you adressing me, nor was I un-civil at the time, broke no rules; or gave off any bad vibes, yet you followed me buzzing like a horse fly at every post, some fucking adult, if it bothers you that much that ask them to ban me, forever, because thats the only way you'd truely have silence from me, I'm a adult... when I'm mad I vent, I don't let a mod stop me since they don't even up-hold there own guide lines and get rid of thread derailing losers like you, but knowing you, even if I am banned, you'd be like sxcolpz or what ever the fuck his name was and follow me to other forums despised by how bad you dumb assholes put the ownage upoun yourself.


If you look for trouble, than you just might find it.

Leave it be then, cause I'm sick of your contradicting, condesending, hypocritcal scared lying ass. You were owned on subject by not only me but countless of other people of even countless of other topics, yet all I have is the same cunts buzzing around having the same lame come-backs to hide there ownage and point minor details, when the initial or main substance is alot more gradifying, since we both know why you reply specifically to me, it aint so you can be a adult-noble and dignified, its because I made an ass out of you and you are a huge fucking cry baby sore loser about it, if anyone should man the fuck up its you, you twat.

You know what, I don't think I'll even come back, you can have your fun here, I'll move on and let you re-main in your world of butt-hurt...good luck, and try not to get too way up your ass, since you're bleeding asshole is evident in how much you and sxolpz stalk the hell out of me.

XD XD XD Tootles Bitch.

Nice rant, shame it has absolutely nothing to do with what I was saying.

You seem bent on reducing your argument to "Lions, fuck yeah! Awesome! I love lions me.", which is fine but don't try and kid yourself that you bring any sort of scientific or factual bearing to what is a fatuous subject in the first place.
 

Soundmanred

Lifer
Oct 26, 2006
10,780
6
81
Nice rant, shame it has absolutely nothing to do with what I was saying.

You seem bent on reducing your argument to "Lions, fuck yeah! Awesome! I love lions me.", which is fine but don't try and kid yourself that you bring any sort of scientific or factual bearing to what is a fatuous subject in the first place.
If you look for trouble, than you just might find it.
:awe:
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,994
31,557
146
lol Well, I did improve a bit from what I first started off with grammar and punctuation, as I can only get better as time goes along, its the same thing with music, I dont have to know how to read notes, know keys, letterings and all that jazz in order to make a guitar sound good, in verse I dont have to have a masters degree in the english grammar and punctuation to shatter your world in the L vs T debate, obviously it had a huge impact on you that won't in any time stop mind f00king you, yet petty insults about punctuation actually improves me in the long run, and I have some pretty thick skin...I can take it...

Can you?

Nah, you're the cry baby remember, you whine and cry like a bitch anytime I flame back.


Look, I know that when you say these things to yourself they sound pretty good when stoned and outright shnockered off your ass, but you should realize that none of this is true in the world where real people live.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,994
31,557
146
In a way it is:

(First colume down #6)

Thickness of consistancy, Impenetrability

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/density

Hence a pencil sized led is heavier than a pencil size'd peice of steel, yet the steel size'd pencil is harder/densar.


no, not at all. density is the "amount of molecules"

hardness is a specific property of a particular material, or particular class of molecules. The two should not be confused.
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
I shall dress up in a lion furry suit and pwn him good. :D
Even fake lions are wimps, easily owned. Hears prufe
1352914281_monty_python__lion_fight.gif
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Nice rant, shame it has absolutely nothing to do with what I was saying.

You seem bent on reducing your argument to "Lions, fuck yeah! Awesome! I love lions me.", which is fine but don't try and kid yourself that you bring any sort of scientific or factual bearing to what is a fatuous subject in the first place.

Nope,

Just because I point out facts about something thats easy to comprehend and provide support on, doesn't mean I idlelize it, I favour fighting bulls over a lion in a fight any day even if I could make like you and be all deceptive to make like the lion would win, I wouldn't/don't...Since I know thats hardly the truth....Absolutely Nothing???

lol Yeah, right. Thats why I'm followed around by the same idiot who magically just happens to be in the same threads as I post in with absolutely never anything positive to say just by chance, its like you're subscribed to when I post you get a email lol Absoultely would then be a contradiction since you know its because you've been decimated in the previous thread, so its like I can't ever get rid of you, you have to have the last word on everything...kinda like how zinfamous claims he lives in the real world but his main foucus is to convince the world the predator can kill a terminator...lol Some real world that is.

I've dealt with dummys like you already, you will never man up, reminds me of how butt hurt the tiger fanatics were like Paul was, since now hes so butt hurt that even when some one just says I disagree he has to bull rush in and say lol owned, even though there's no substance to it. XD

mmmm you tiger fanatics, lol whats the most funniest is, I actually commend the tiger more than all of you, I point out the truth leading to respecting him not over hyping his name, over exaggerating his capabilitys which in terms would be spoiling his demeanor and degrading him by lie-ing over his name, the tiger doesn't need that type of insult, he is second to none as a hunter a beautiful animal and one of my most favorite ones to boot, yet you all don't care for the tiger not one bit, you only care if he wins aginst a lion more then vice versa, because you're head was filled with flawed, fake, lies that your bias insecuirtys keep you held down in not opening your eyes to the truth...thats all it is.

On all the sites even yuku, the most die hard fanatics don't even like the tiger, since I was the only one to go off topic to point out the dire stress is upoun both, yet manipulation, deception, bullshit lies just keep hiting the fans in being the only reason to post...and then you stooges act like you're the ones educated, you're the ones with sometype of life?

XD XD XD

Good luck with that.
 

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
Silver Prime I'm not sure how to respond to such convictions, and I can't even nitpick your horrible grammar and spelling. Anthropomorphism is great for selling movies or books, but trying to use it in a debate is comical at best, and very disingenuous in practice.

I do not oppose ignorance in practice, as long as the ignorant accept their lot in life and either accept education or refuse it and go off the deep end in their convictions. In the former scenario, someone learns something, the latter only serves to whittle down the blissfully ignorant into easily countered groups.

This phenomenon has been played out on a large scale by the evolutionist vs. creationist debate. The media has since moved on to other mind numbing topics, but back in the day it was somewhat comical to watch so much floundering on the wrong side. Such simple concepts absolutely dismissed even in the presence of someone right in front of them telling them why these concepts work.
 

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
14,011
3,400
146
Nope,

Just because I point out facts about something thats easy to comprehend and provide support on, doesn't mean I idlelize it, I favour fighting bulls over a lion in a fight any day even if I could make like you and be all deceptive to make like the lion would win, I wouldn't/don't...Since I know thats hardly the truth....Absolutely Nothing???

lol Yeah, right. Thats why I'm followed around by the same idiot who magically just happens to be in the same threads as I post in with absolutely never anything positive to say just by chance, its like you're subscribed to when I post you get a email lol Absoultely would then be a contradiction since you know its because you've been decimated in the previous thread, so its like I can't ever get rid of you, you have to have the last word on everything...kinda like how zinfamous claims he lives in the real world but his main foucus is to convince the world the predator can kill a terminator...lol Some real world that is.

I've dealt with dummys like you already, you will never man up, reminds me of how butt hurt the tiger fanatics were like Paul was, since now hes so butt hurt that even when some one just says I disagree he has to bull rush in and say lol owned, even though there's no substance to it. XD

mmmm you tiger fanatics, lol whats the most funniest is, I actually commend the tiger more than all of you, I point out the truth leading to respecting him not over hyping his name, over exaggerating his capabilitys which in terms would be spoiling his demeanor and degrading him by lie-ing over his name, the tiger doesn't need that type of insult, he is second to none as a hunter a beautiful animal and one of my most favorite ones to boot, yet you all don't care for the tiger not one bit, you only care if he wins aginst a lion more then vice versa, because you're head was filled with flawed, fake, lies that your bias insecuirtys keep you held down in not opening your eyes to the truth...thats all it is.

On all the sites even yuku, the most die hard fanatics don't even like the tiger, since I was the only one to go off topic to point out the dire stress is upoun both, yet manipulation, deception, bullshit lies just keep hiting the fans in being the only reason to post...and then you stooges act like you're the ones educated, you're the ones with sometype of life?

XD XD XD

Good luck with that.

Bravo, good sir, Bravo!

That speech brot teers to my eyes and gave me a bone-er all at the same time.
 

Soundmanred

Lifer
Oct 26, 2006
10,780
6
81
Silver Prime I'm not sure how to respond to such convictions, and I can't even nitpick your horrible grammar and spelling. Anthropomorphism is great for selling movies or books, but trying to use it in a debate is comical at best, and very disingenuous in practice.

I do not oppose ignorance in practice, as long as the ignorant accept their lot in life and either accept education or refuse it and go off the deep end in their convictions. In the former scenario, someone learns something, the latter only serves to whittle down the blissfully ignorant into easily countered groups.

This phenomenon has been played out on a large scale by the evolutionist vs. creationist debate. The media has since moved on to other mind numbing topics, but back in the day it was somewhat comical to watch so much floundering on the wrong side. Such simple concepts absolutely dismissed even in the presence of someone right in front of them telling them why these concepts work.
No fair!
You KNOW he doesn't know 80% of those words.
That's cheating!
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Silver Prime I'm not sure how to respond to such convictions, and I can't even nitpick your horrible grammar and spelling. Anthropomorphism is great for selling movies or books, but trying to use it in a debate is comical at best, and very disingenuous in practice.

I do not oppose ignorance in practice, as long as the ignorant accept their lot in life and either accept education or refuse it and go off the deep end in their convictions. In the former scenario, someone learns something, the latter only serves to whittle down the blissfully ignorant into easily countered groups.

This phenomenon has been played out on a large scale by the evolutionist vs. creationist debate. The media has since moved on to other mind numbing topics, but back in the day it was somewhat comical to watch so much floundering on the wrong side. Such simple concepts absolutely dismissed even in the presence of someone right in front of them telling them why these concepts work.

Ohhhhhhh, Kinda like how science can explain everything about God, it can explain how it works whats the formula/equaitions to religous and spiritual factors.

Nah, I'll stick to demolishing liars, exposing bias losers, thread derailers, trolls with no life other then being a bot spell checker-nazi, nothing of substance or on topic, when I wanna learn more of the english language and its writing I'll look up on it, for now, I can just have my fun exploiting trolls like the lot.
 

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
Ohhhhhhh, Kinda like how science can explain everything about God, it can explain how it works whats the formula/equaitions to religous and spiritual factors.

Nah, I'll stick to demolishing liars, exposing bias losers, thread derailers, trolls with no life other then being a bot spell checker-nazi, nothing of substance or on topic, when I wanna learn more of the english language and its writing I'll look up on it, for now, I can just have my fun trolling the lot.

Fixed that last part for you, you're welcome.

Before we go off in a side debate in which you will surely embarrass yourself the religion thing was more of a decoy, and if you noticed, or had a modicum of wit, would notice that I phrased it without choosing a particular side. The fact that I use written English correctly leads you to automatically assume I am on the evolutionist's side does amuse me, but maybe if I purposely injected errors and a more condescending tone you would have guessed otherwise?

Like I said before, in a roundabout way, sorry my post does not have substance or I am a bias liar, but your off the handle remarks cannot go unchecked because even though most of us are laughing at your ignorance, there might be just one person who thinks "maybe this guy is right" in this particularly ridiculous thread. That poster might then search for your other posts and use your ignorant views as some kind of basis for posting here or other internet opinions.

I don't really have a problem with ignorance, to beat a dead horse, except when it is used to mold the minds of anyone impressionable. Children, for example, are one group I worry about when they are statistically exposed to a lot of nonsense from their parents and are inheriting some very real problems that burying their heads in the sand is not going to solve.
 

Brian Stirling

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
3,964
2
0
Just read along, it's a different kind of entertaining. Maybe not to everyone's taste. Join in even. You get exttra poince for misbelling words that ushually don't got misbelling.

I would like to be the first to announce my support for SilverPrime to be the next president of the USA. And, I'd recommend 100 debates and 100 town hall meetings. Why, might you ask...

Colbert


Brian
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Fixed that last part for you, you're welcome.

Before we go off in a side debate in which you will surely embarrass yourself the religion thing was more of a decoy, and if you noticed, or had a modicum of wit, would notice that I phrased it without choosing a particular side. The fact that I use written English correctly leads you to automatically assume I am on the evolutionist's side does amuse me, but maybe if I purposely injected errors and a more condescending tone you would have guessed otherwise?

Like I said before, in a roundabout way, sorry my post does not have substance or I am a bias liar, but your off the handle remarks cannot go unchecked because even though most of us are laughing at your ignorance, there might be just one person who thinks "maybe this guy is right" in this particularly ridiculous thread. That poster might then search for your other posts and use your ignorant views as some kind of basis for posting here or other internet opinions.

I don't really have a problem with ignorance, to beat a dead horse, except when it is used to mold the minds of anyone impressionable. Children, for example, are one group I worry about when they are statistically exposed to a lot of nonsense from their parents and are inheriting some very real problems that burying their heads in the sand is not going to solve.

Of course I'm right, seperating views and preception, I'm dam right, since this isn't a thread with its title called you are not allowed to talk about a pack of 10 gorillas vs a lion, you can only act as a spam-bot spell checker...right?

Because you have a higher knowledge in just the english language I thought you were more of the evolutionist? What the fuck are you talking about?
I don't catagorize anyone on just punctuation and vocabulary limits, I stay in the vicinity of the forums guidelines...to stay on topic...there was no entry level requirement to have a masters in english to join this forum...was there? You would be inverse breaking them not to make a point, but just because thats all you're good for being an asshole troll.

Children and there irational parents, now? Dude, if you truely have no purpose other than being such a dumbass because your life is in the shitter so you wanna make your self feel better by being a spell-checker bot...then I advise you to do it else where, since your self esteem was already at a all time low persuing these type of reasons to randomly pick a thread so you randomly landed on one that you have no interest in? Explain some of that logic, you won't last long in something you are hiding, consealing the fact that you're at your own wits end, you're depressed with how you can aid no substance on topic so you contradicting your whole purpose here are as you said...Conviction.

Here where I'm from, where a child-less adult who has no kids of his own, prying into other mens/fathers buisness in how to raise a child is called a stupid ass, I don't care for levels in grammar or punctuation as long as what is stated can be comprehended to a degree, since what you're doing is no different from a professor level'd schaller who has his masters in one occupation thinking*that he is then universal in all occupations, me I'm just the average lay'd back individual...pointing out small but yet factual implications... you're like how a guy who claims he knows everything about the universe, but then while giving his speech in front of a class falls off the stage and breaks his leg....I'm the guy sitting through that pointless lecture laughing at his so call supreme knowledge of everything unfold as he/you stumbles off the stage and breaks his neck.

XD XD XD
 
Last edited:

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
Of course I'm right, seperating views and peception, I'm dam right, since this isn't a thread with its title called you are not allowed to talk about a pack of 10 gorillas vs a lion, you can only act as a spam-bot spell checker...right?

Because you have a higher knowledge in just the english language I thought you were more of the evolutionist? What the fuck are you talking about?
I don't catagorize anyone on just punctuation and vocabulary limits, I stay in the vicinity of the forums guidelines...to stay on topic...there was no entry level requirement to have a masters in english to join this forum...was there? You would be inverse breaking them not to make a point, but just because thats all you're good for being an asshole troll.

Children and there irational parents, now? Dude, if you truely have no purpose other than being such a dumbass because your life is in the shitter so you wanna make your self feel better by being a spell-checker bot...then I advise you to do it else where, since your self esteem was already at a all time low persuing these type of reasons to randomly pick a thread so you randomly landed on one that you have no interest in? Explain some of that logic, you won't last long in something you are hiding, consealing the fact that you're at your own wits end, you're depressed with how you can aid no substance on topic so you contradicting your whole purpose here are as you said...Conviction.

Here where I'm from, where a child-less adult who has no kids of his own, prying into other mens/fathers buisness in how to raise a child is called a stupid ass, I don't care for levels in grammar or punctuation as long as what is stated can be comprehended to a degree, since what you're doing is no different from a professor level'd schaller who has his masters in one occupation thinking*that he is then universal in all occupations, me I'm just the average lay'd back individual...pointing out small but yet factual implications... you're like how a guy who claims he knows everything about the universe, but then while giving his speech in front of a class falls off the stage and breaks his leg....I'm the guy sitting through that pointless lecture laughing at his so call supreme knowledge of everything unfold as he/you stumbles off the stage and breaks his neck.

XD XD XD

And that is your prerogative, you were the one that put in your first response to me:

Ohhhhhhh, Kinda like how science can explain everything about God, it can explain how it works whats the formula/equaitions to religous and spiritual factors.

I might have started the chain when I casually injected the evolution vs, creation debate, but you took it and ran to the nearest fallacy you could find.

I chose not to address the original topic because it is ridiculous, and the fact you took it so seriously is both comical and sad.

My argument was not around your poor grasp of the written language but your anthropomorphism of creatures which do not need that.

Call me whatever you want, I am done feeding your delusions, but I never meant for this to be a personal attack, only that you have no business debating something if using weak tools to do so. If you are an ESL individual, then I applaud how far you have come, but don't try to jump into debates if not properly equipped to do so, stick to your native language.
 
Apr 20, 2008
10,067
990
126
The lion would be dead in a matter of minutes. No doubt.

On topic, the lion is the starfish...

1174203474549.jpg
 
Last edited:

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Fixed that last part for you, you're welcome.

Ahhhh ha ha ha ha ahh,

So you swaped "me exploiting you trolls", to me being a troll?

Wow!

And it all falls down, a guy that has his only purpose in life is to go around and educate people on the english language, there meanings, an all of its vocabulary, there synonyms, the whole sha-bang, and yet doesn't phantom that he is exactly that; a troll...you should have known that oh wise and powerful know it all of english language...it states here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

Posting Off topic messages in a forum

You've just lost your only pathetic reason to live, from now on, you will be known as...Professor....

'Professor Dumbass'


As for your recent reply about me being a tool and this thread being ridculous, I love how you spend all your time...searching into ridculous things then, kinda like a guy who hates gays and then goes on the internet looking for them, which most put together the main reason is because they themselves are secretly gay, and hate themselves for it, kinda like how you dont like ridculous threads yet you go looking for them, inverse you yourself is ridculous XD XD.

The only tool here is you, since you consider over 50 million people who look into similar threads/debates all tools....50 million peoples wanting to look up something interesting>>>>>>>>>>>>>Professor dumbass opposing it.

Thanks alot man, you brighten'd up my day and put a big smile on my face, so if anything I'll catch you laters Professor Dumbass. :)
 
Last edited:
Apr 20, 2008
10,067
990
126
Since 10 gorillas could literally trample a lion, this ins't even a question. Even pussy gorillas could get it done.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
The lion would be dead in a matter of minutes. No doubt.

On topic, the lion is the starfish...

1174203474549.jpg

Ha ha ha, thanks for not only making my day, but my week, as soon as I mentioned your stink twat of a name, I knew you were gonna come crawling back, ***ahem*** I ment stalking my tracks, XD XD In fact as soon as I did, I started playing this song...Dont let me down:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUNxWax8WGs

Thanks, I knew you wern't going to let me down in making my point of how obessed you are in ya stalking me.

Tootles ^_^
 
Status
Not open for further replies.