Originally posted by: athfbum
The only thing different between the DS3 and the S3 is the DS3 uses all solid capacitors.
According to the P965 board article done by Anand, the P5B-E is a better overclocker.
Originally posted by: Markfw900
My S3 is at 7x500... I am happy with it.
Originally posted by: Duvie
Originally posted by: athfbum
The only thing different between the DS3 and the S3 is the DS3 uses all solid capacitors.
According to the P965 board article done by Anand, the P5B-E is a better overclocker.
yeah but I am still concerned by bios limitation on the mch volatge and vdimm...even if it wasn't an issue in therte testing....
PLus Both Mark and I were able to attain 500fsb on our S3 mobos...if DS3 is supposed to be solid capacitors they shoudl do as well...
However the S3 and its 25 dollar less price tag verus the DS3 is hard to overlook...
Throw in the fact the S3 is 45-50+ dollars cheaper then the P5b-e I know which I would try....I care not to support Asus and there mentality to bend us over when it comes to their pricing.
Fact is you still are not even guaranteed a 3.5+ghz oc on your E6300 and E6400...If you get an E6300 you may lean towards the Asus mobo if you have some high-end memory modules that can run 1000ddr2 on 2.1v or less. If you get E6400 with the 8x multi you dont even need to worry about it cause you likely will tap out at 455-460 range which the DS3 (on mine) and S3 (on my 2 buddies) did just fine....
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: Duvie
Originally posted by: athfbum
The only thing different between the DS3 and the S3 is the DS3 uses all solid capacitors.
According to the P965 board article done by Anand, the P5B-E is a better overclocker.
yeah but I am still concerned by bios limitation on the mch volatge and vdimm...even if it wasn't an issue in therte testing....
PLus Both Mark and I were able to attain 500fsb on our S3 mobos...if DS3 is supposed to be solid capacitors they shoudl do as well...
However the S3 and its 25 dollar less price tag verus the DS3 is hard to overlook...
Throw in the fact the S3 is 45-50+ dollars cheaper then the P5b-e I know which I would try....I care not to support Asus and there mentality to bend us over when it comes to their pricing.
Fact is you still are not even guaranteed a 3.5+ghz oc on your E6300 and E6400...If you get an E6300 you may lean towards the Asus mobo if you have some high-end memory modules that can run 1000ddr2 on 2.1v or less. If you get E6400 with the 8x multi you dont even need to worry about it cause you likely will tap out at 455-460 range which the DS3 (on mine) and S3 (on my 2 buddies) did just fine....
Asus charges what people pay...same with DFI who's enthusiast boards are pricey.
Originally posted by: nyker96
A quick question regarding S3's ram voltage, I am recommending my friend on D9 chips for OC, so he needs like 2.2V on it. Does S3 able to do that much on RAM voltage? and would you guys recommend going with D9 RAMs on this board?
On question of overpay/overcharge, I personally would dish out the extra cash for DFI but not Asus just cause DFIs very cool boards to own. Now that I got a Antec Lanboy, I would appreciate flashy board designs like DFIs,
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Asus charges what people pay...same with DFI who's enthusiast boards are pricey.
Originally posted by: Duvie
Originally posted by: nyker96
A quick question regarding S3's ram voltage, I am recommending my friend on D9 chips for OC, so he needs like 2.2V on it. Does S3 able to do that much on RAM voltage? and would you guys recommend going with D9 RAMs on this board?
On question of overpay/overcharge, I personally would dish out the extra cash for DFI but not Asus just cause DFIs very cool boards to own. Now that I got a Antec Lanboy, I would appreciate flashy board designs like DFIs,
I believe the S3 goes to 2.5v but I personally never raised it higher then 2.3v....
Originally posted by: Markfw900
My S3 is at 7x500... I am happy with it.
Originally posted by: nyker96
sounds like S3s got plenty OCing options on all aspects. So is there a reason for me to recommend DS3 over S3? I do hear some forum talking about the better capacitors in DS3 will allow better running of Quad in the future.
Originally posted by: Duvie
Asus ppl are becoming like mac fans....Proud to have paid too much!!!!!
Originally posted by: n7
Originally posted by: Duvie
Asus ppl are becoming like mac fans....Proud to have paid too much!!!!!
Or maybe Asus fans are just smart enough to avoid recommending the bugfest that is the DS3.
I am well aware that Asus is generally a ripoff, but considering the number of issues out there with DS3 users, i somehow don't think you have any grounds to say Asus is a poor choice.
Not saying there aren't issues with Asus either though, as lately i keep seeing all kinds of threads with ppl having trouble with thier P5B-Ds.
Originally posted by: Sunrise089
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Asus charges what people pay...same with DFI who's enthusiast boards are pricey.
This doesn't seem a valid comparison to me at all. DFI almost guarantees you a top-performing product that offers all the features an enthusiest would want. ASUS might mean that, or it might meen a budget part with integrated video.
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: Sunrise089
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Asus charges what people pay...same with DFI who's enthusiast boards are pricey.
This doesn't seem a valid comparison to me at all. DFI almost guarantees you a top-performing product that offers all the features an enthusiest would want. ASUS might mean that, or it might meen a budget part with integrated video.
ASUS has a good history of very solid boards, that's why they're expensive. It's a name people know. Tell someone about Epox and some people never heard of them because there's no review in their "tech-mag"
Originally posted by: Duvie
DS3 you are probably right....The S3 is the C2 version of the DS3 and doesn't seem to have same issues...I would take the S3 for 50+ dollars less anyday....The asus mobo in every product line are generally a ripoff...i am not saying Gigabyte is better, but there is generally a better maker making it cheaper...PPL like wearing Asus badges like some sort of honor.
You are right Asus has many problems and has had for years in all of their products...My MSI Neo2 board generally oc'd much better at the time of my 3000+ then any Asus mobo that didn't have to have countless hardmods to it.
I will give you one thing...I would rather have an asus mobo for this E6600, but I wont pay the premium (it is what it is!!!) to get perhaps another 100-200mhz out of this chip...
Originally posted by: n7
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: Sunrise089
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Asus charges what people pay...same with DFI who's enthusiast boards are pricey.
This doesn't seem a valid comparison to me at all. DFI almost guarantees you a top-performing product that offers all the features an enthusiest would want. ASUS might mean that, or it might meen a budget part with integrated video.
ASUS has a good history of very solid boards, that's why they're expensive. It's a name people know. Tell someone about Epox and some people never heard of them because there's no review in their "tech-mag"
Key word is history.
Meaning past, not current.
I have two Asus mobo presently sitting in my two systems beside me here, so don't think i am biased, but seriously, Asus is far from being "solid" these days, or especially the last few years.
They have more than their fair share of issues.