P4 -> ogr or rc5 (can't do seti)

[Possessed Freak]

This is going to be a 30 computer assimilation and it is at work. I need the nicest client in existance which is the dnet one and I need to know if p4's are better at ogr or rc5.

 

[Dazmite]

This P4 sucks at RC5 basically. Average 1.8 M/keys. Our Celeron 566 does 1.58.

Daz

 

[ElFenix]

seti is a nice client...

 

[HomerSapien]

Hes asking out of ogr and rc5, which is the p4 faster at, not is it good at either.

Sorry, i really dont know.

 

[russmanuk]

Maybe if someone knows, the teamanandtech speed page could be updated to include P4s. There seem to have been several P4 speed questions lately.
Anyone using/has access to a P4 yet??

Russman

 

[Adul]

i made out a caculation, a rough one, for the p4 running rc5.

 

[Possessed Freak]

elfenix, don't make me point out the many problems seti has, I have run it, and will probably run it again, but I can not do it on a work related herd such as this assimilation, I know the dnet client plays nicely, does not use much resources, and is damn near seamless.

HomerSapien nailed it, I know the P4 is lousy in comparison to other cpus, but I need to know which it is better at ogr, or rc5?

 

[sciencewhiz]

After checking the d.net speeds, and averaging the values it looks like the P4 gets 1.35 kkey/s/mhz and 3.80 knodes/s/mhz. This would put it better at OGR than RC5, though it still sucks at both

For comparison, a 1.5 ghz P4 would equal a 700 mhz tbird at OGR or a 600 mhz tbird at RC5.

edit: I think it makes sense now

 

[Possessed Freak]

k, cool,thx

 

[Bakwetu]

Look on the bright side of this, it is still a 30 machine assimilation-nice work PF