Guys, I'm getting ready to build a new system, to replace my PIII-650/Abit BH6 system that's going to college next fall w/ my daughter. For a period of time (b4 Northwood) I was pretty much set on an AthlonXP system. Now w/ the Northwood cpu's I'm leaning toward them.
At best I'll do very light overclocking. My kids use this system for homework, and as I travel occasionally I don't want to field questions about why the computer doesn't work, when I'm out. So, my question is this: for sake of comparison if both the 1.6A and 1.8A were run at stock speed, would one notice a difference in how a system would run? There's a $50 difference in price between these two processors, and I'll spend it in a heartbeat if the 1.8A is the superior solution. However, if for the typical uses of this machine (internet, Office, light gaming) the extra 200MHz will have no affect, then it will be the 1.6A.
At best I'll do very light overclocking. My kids use this system for homework, and as I travel occasionally I don't want to field questions about why the computer doesn't work, when I'm out. So, my question is this: for sake of comparison if both the 1.6A and 1.8A were run at stock speed, would one notice a difference in how a system would run? There's a $50 difference in price between these two processors, and I'll spend it in a heartbeat if the 1.8A is the superior solution. However, if for the typical uses of this machine (internet, Office, light gaming) the extra 200MHz will have no affect, then it will be the 1.6A.