The L1 cache is full speed, the L2 cache is the slower cache. I believe the L1 cache on a P3 is 1/2 the size of the L1 on the Athlon. Anyway, when the P3 outperforms the Athlon in a particular game, Q3 for example, it is only by 1 or 2 FPS and sometime less than that. If you are using a Geforce DDR, any game will fly with a CPU above 700mhz. When you are running games at more than 60fps, 1 FPS is not even noticeable. Like I said before, if you had two systems at the same clock speed, Athlon or P3, you probably wouldn't be able to tell any difference. It is up to you. It sounds like you want a P3, so by all means get one. The coppermines are a nice chip, I just think the Athlon is a more advanced design. It is really only held back by the slower L2 cache. I upgraded from a P3 system and I had a P2 system before that, I just like my Athlon system better. It is a hard choice, but I think the Athlon wins the "bang for the buck" title. I just heard that in September, AMD will be cutting the price of the 1ghz Athlon to $450 from almost $1000 now. I wonder if you will even be able to buy a 1ghz P3 by then.