• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

OWNED....don't act like a cry bitch in court....

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: johnjohn320
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
That's pretty much where you tell her to 'fuck off you wise and beautiful woman' and accept the contempt charge. It would be worth it just to knock her down a little. Judges aren't that special and need to get smacked a bit.

What matters is what's true, not what you wear to work.

You'd make an outstanding lawyer. :roll:

No I wouldn't; I believe that justice supersedes law. I also don't respect positions, just the people in them if they're deserving. *shrug* Doesn't bother me a bit since based on my personal ideology I'm a much better person than most lawyers I've met.

Well, it's a good thing most of us have matured beyond that line of thought.
 
Originally posted by: johnjohn320
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: johnjohn320
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
That's pretty much where you tell her to 'fuck off you wise and beautiful woman' and accept the contempt charge. It would be worth it just to knock her down a little. Judges aren't that special and need to get smacked a bit.

What matters is what's true, not what you wear to work.

You'd make an outstanding lawyer. :roll:

No I wouldn't; I believe that justice supersedes law. I also don't respect positions, just the people in them if they're deserving. *shrug* Doesn't bother me a bit since based on my personal ideology I'm a much better person than most lawyers I've met.

Well, it's a good thing most of us have matured beyond that line of thought.

Personally I wouldn't say you benefit in any way from it, but that's just me.
 
Originally posted by: ric1287
Originally posted by: nick1985
Originally posted by: Whisper
The way I understand it, these court TV shows have a set budget for each case that is distributed by the judge via his/her ruling. Thus, if the judge rules in favor of the plaintiff for $500, the plaintiff receives $500 of the case's "purse," with the remainder being divided evenly among the plaintiff and defendant (thereby providing incentive for people to come on the show). The two parties also agree not to try the case in an actual court of law.

Or something like that.

As far as I know, though, the judges on the shows are, or at least were, all judges at some point in their careers.

"At the end of each show, the following disclaimer appears:

"Both the plaintiff and the defendant have been paid from a fund for their appearance. The amount, if any, awarded in the case, is deducted from this fund, and the remainder is divided equally between both litigants. The amount of the fund is dependent on the size of the judgement." [sic] No information is given as to what relation the amount of the fund bears to the size of the judgment, nor the amount of the fund if a verdict for the defense is rendered."

--wikipedia

that doesn't mean she is a judge though, and she isn't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_Milian

Marilyn Milian, Esq. (born May 1, 1961 in Queens, New York) is a former Florida state circuit court judge and currently presides over the American television program The People's Court. She is the first female judge to preside over the long-running show and the first Hispanic judge to sit on the bench of any English language television court show.
 
Originally posted by: newnameman
She's not even a real judge....

Actually she was

" a former Florida state circuit court judge and currently presides over the American television program The People's Court. "

From the wiki
 
Originally posted by: Whisper
Originally posted by: TehMac
Not really ownage. I kinda doubt this is real. For one thing, the judge went off on a real tangent, that in itself is highly disrespectful to the court members and unprofessional to the highest degree. When you're in office as a judicial member, I don't think you have any more right to snap back at someone with that kind of emotional or professional angst response.

It's just TV drama and if it is real, both parties embarrassed the shit out of themselves and both need to remove themselves from any sort of civil office.

As I said in my post, I don't think that the show itself is a true legal environment. However, in my experiences in courtrooms, I've heard judges say things similar to what was in the clip...albeit in a slightly less-animated manner.

Both parties sign papers designating the judge as a legal arbitrator and that they will abide by the ruling. It's about as close to a judge as you can get. The judge is bound by the laws of the state they make the show in however.
 
Originally posted by: Leros
I thought Judge Dredd (or maybe it somebody else) wasn't a judge, but his first name was Judge. Something like that?

hung jury with judge reinhold?
 
Originally posted by: Cdubneeddeal
That's a bunch of bullshit. She threw a fit because the guy disagreed with her - power trip.

so, how did it feel to get your ass verbally spanked on national television?
 
Back
Top