SaltBoy
Diamond Member
- Aug 13, 2001
- 8,975
- 11
- 81
Originally posted by: Krakn3Dfx
Soapbox:
A lot of people walked into Signs thinking it was something other than what they ended up seeing. People were expecting a movie about alien invasion, which was only an obscure background item in Signs. The real story here was the journey of a broken man to regain his own belief system, and in fact his own life. To say that Signs was stupid is a shallow interpretation, it was probably one of the best, most well thought out movies of 2002, but since there were no big budget special effects, no aliens exploding on glass windows, no laser guns or big, impressive spaceships, people blew it off as a failure. No doubt the trailers shown were misleading, but that would be the fault of a poor marketing team more than anything. Regardless, the movie made a good deal of money, as it deserved to, since it was well scripted, the acting was superb, and it did an excellent job of telling the story Shyamalan intended it to, regardless of whether or not that story is the one people were expecting when they walked into the theater. I never enjoyed Shyamalan's previous movie, Unbreakable, but Signs actually gave me a better understanding of Unbreakable, which takes the same path Signs does. For fans of massive action and suspense (although Signs did have quite a bit of suspense), then yes, both of these movies were slow, but for people who enjoy a lot of psychological meat in their movies, Signs does the job in spades.
What he said. Shamalyan's trilogy is just wonderful to behold, especially if you have an open mind and don't come to them expecting something in particular. His films are truly unique and special.