Overclocking my E6750 - 3.8GHz so far :D

downhiller80

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,353
0
0
OK, so I've just built my new system.

System:
* GA-P35-DS4
* E6750
* 4GB G.Skill PC2-6400C5 800MHz
* Sparkle passive 8800GT
* Zalman 500W modular PSU.

* Tuniq Tower 120
* TX-2 thermal gunk

* Raptor 74gb system drive
* 500gb & 250gb data drives

Setup:
* All temp readings are using Core Temp 0.96
* I have the fan on the Tuniq turned to the minimum setting to keep my system nice and quiet
* I have a 120mm case fan at the front of my case to cool my HDs
* The PSU also has a 120mm fan in it
* The side is currently not on the case, and to be fair rarely is
* Room temp is about 22°C at the moment I'd guess (72F). I don't really know tbh


Key:
Frequency (mult x FSB) / voltage / idle temps / load temps

Stock:
2.66Ghz (8 x 333MHz) / 1.35v / 29,30 / 47,48

Overclocked:
3.00GHz (8 x 375MHz) / 1.35v / 29,31 / 52,52
3.20GHz (8 x 400MHz) / 1.35v / 30,33 / 54,54
3.40GHz (8 x 425MHz) / 1.35v / wouldn't post
3.40GHz (8 x 425MHz) / 1.40v / wouldn't post
3.40GHz (8 x 425MHz) / 1.45v / wouldn't post
3.40GHz (8 x 425MHz) / 1.50v / wouldn't post
3.24GHz (8 x 405MHz) / 1.35v / 30,32 / 54,54
3.24GHz (8 x 405MHz) / 1.25v / 30,32 / orthos failed after 20 seconds
3.24GHz (8 x 405MHz) / 1.30v / 30,32 / 51,51
3.40GHz (8 x 425MHz) / 1.45v +0.20v DDR2 / wouldn't post
3.28GHz (8 x 410MHz) / 1.35v / 32,34 / 54,54
3.32GHz (8 x 415MHz) / 1.35v / posted, but wouldn't boot into windows
3.32GHz (8 x 415MHz) / 1.40v / posted, but wouldn't boot into windows
3.28GHz (8 x 410MHz) / 1.30v / 31,33 / 52,52
3.32GHz (8 x 415MHz) / 1.35v +0.10v DDR2 +0.10v FSB +0.10v MCH / wouldn't poste
3.32GHz (8 x 415MHz) / 1.40v +0.20v DDR2 +0.20v FSB +0.20v MCH / 33,35 / BSOD after 5mins of Orthos

** Whoops, worked out what was wrong! Turned "performance enhance" to "standard" (from "turbo") **

3.40GHz (8 x 425MHz) / 1.35v / 32,34 / 56,56
3.60GHz (8 x 450MHz) / 1.35v / posted, but wouldn't boot into windows
3.60GHz (8 x 450MHz) / 1.40v / 34,35 / orthos failed after 8 minutes
3.60GHz (8 x 450MHz) / 1.45v / 35,36 / 58,58
3.60GHz (8 x 450MHz) / 1.45v / 35,36 / 58,58
3.70GHz (8 x 463MHz) / 1.45v / 35,37 / orthos failed after 8 minutes
3.70GHz (8 x 463MHz) / 1.475v / 35,37 / 60,60
3.80GHz (8 x 475MHz) / 1.475v / 35,37 / BSOD after a few hours of Orthos

** I'll add other OCs in here as I do them **
 

downhiller80

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,353
0
0
Hmm, up to 3.2GHz (8 x 400MHz) and still stock voltage and only 52° under load. These processors are great aren't they - I remember fondly the day of getting my Duron 650 to over 1GHz, I reckon these E6750 are just as good!

(FWIW this is the first Intel proc I've ever bought :Q)
 

The-Noid

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,117
4
76
Seems like 3.6 is a hardwall for these chips. You can get a bit past but you start to see diminishing returns where you have to add serious vcore to take it any higher.
 

downhiller80

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,353
0
0
Hmmm, 3.4GHz (8 x 425) wouldn't post even going up to 1.4V. Time for me to do some reading and find out what an acceptable voltage to go up to is!
 

BlueAcolyte

Platinum Member
Nov 19, 2007
2,793
2
0
1.5V is good for hard use. Of course, some chips are different... Be careful of that sparkle, they get up to absurd temps under load... maybe stick a fan near it to cool the heatsink?
 

downhiller80

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,353
0
0
Hmm, just tried 3.4GHz 8 * 425 @ 1.5V and it still wouldn't post. I'm reluctant to go any higher given the vcore everyone else runs on here. Given that I'm running very happily at 3.2GHz 8 * 400 @ 1.35V do you think it's a different problem? Seems that I've got plenty of headroom in terms of voltage and temps, so why won't it post at 8x425? Could it be my memory?
 

downhiller80

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,353
0
0
Originally posted by: BlueAcolyte
they get up to absurd temps under load... maybe stick a fan near it to cool the heatsink?

I read Anand's review and am happy that it'll be ok where it is. Certainly it runs through 3dmark06 (8800, does that sound about right?) with no problems.
 

boomhower

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2007
7,228
19
81
You may need to up your ram voltage and/or MCH to go to 425. Which version of the RAM do you have? HZ's? If nothing else you could run a mutliplier to down clock your ram.
 

downhiller80

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,353
0
0
I've already got the ram as slow as it goes (2 x 425MHz = 850Mhz).

The memory I bought is this stuff http://www.overclockers.co.uk/...t.php?prodid=MY-019-GS (G.Skill 4GB DDR2 PQ PC2-6400C5 (2x2GB) CAS5 F2-6400CL5D-4GBPQ)

I tried bumping the DDR2 voltage up 0.20v and it made no difference. I'm adding a complete log of my progress to the original post in this thread.

Here's a dull observation - Core Temp refuses to return a temp of 53°C, I'm seeing a lot of 52 in my logs, and the occasional 54, but never 53. Told you it was dull :p
 

badnewcastle

Golden Member
Jun 30, 2004
1,016
0
0
Originally posted by: sebfrost
Hmm, just tried 3.4GHz 8 * 425 @ 1.5V and it still wouldn't post. I'm reluctant to go any higher given the vcore everyone else runs on here. Given that I'm running very happily at 3.2GHz 8 * 400 @ 1.35V do you think it's a different problem? Seems that I've got plenty of headroom in terms of voltage and temps, so why won't it post at 8x425? Could it be my memory?

If you hitting a wall at 3.4, it's likely your motherboard or memory... try running memtest86+, if that runs well on test 5 for a 5-10 passes and atleast 1 pass on the whole test...

You can bump you memory up to 2.0v, if your not already there and make sure the timings are set to mfg's recommendations...
If that doesn't work and you still can't post then you could try bumping up your NB Voltage, slowly...
 

downhiller80

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,353
0
0
Latest: 3.32GHz (8 x 415MHz) / 1.40v +0.20v DDR2 +0.20v FSB +0.20v MCH / 33,35 / waiting for load temps...

edit: BSODed after 5mins of Orthos.

Going back to last known good, I need to stop wasting time and do some work :p
 

downhiller80

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,353
0
0
Amazing how much difference the TIM curing can make, a week later and my idle temps have dropped to 25/28C (running at 3.2GHz /1.325v) and load temps dropped to 48C
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,572
10,208
126
$190 for 3.2Ghz, 4MB L2 cache, or $60 for 3.2Ghz, 1MB L2 cache. Which would you choose? I'd pick the latter.
 

Phunk0ne

Senior member
Jul 20, 2007
494
0
0
if you want to keep your E6750 @ 3.2GHz @ 1:1 ratio, why not undervolting it?
I was able to reach 1.25V in BIOS, Everest reads 1.2V @ Idle & 1.184V under Load.

These were my results keeping my FSB @ 1:1 ratio

*side note: I have both my TR U-120-E and my cpu IHS lapped

Result 1:

Undervolted
@ 3.2GHz
BIOS: 1.25V

Everest:
Idle @ 1.200V
Load @1.184 (ORTHOS)

FSB:RAM Ration @ 1:1
RAM Frew @ 400MHz DDRII-800
RAM @ 1.9V @ 4-4-4-12
Stock all over the board.

ORTHOS Stable
3DMark 06 Score: 13209

Temps:
Idle @ ~23C
Load @ ~37C


Result 2:

@ 3.6GHz
BIOS: 1.40000V

Everest:
Idle @ 1.360
Load @ 1.328 (ORTHOS)

FSB:RAM Ration @ 1:1
RAM Freq @ 450MHz DDRII-900
RAM @ 1.9V @ 5-5-5-15
MCH @ +.1V

ORTHOS Stable
3DMark 06 Score: 13729

Temps:
Idle @ ~25C
Load @ ~46C



Result 3:

@ 3.8GHz
BIOS: 1.50625V


Everest:
Idle @ 1.456V
Load @ 1.424V (ORTHOS)

FSB:RAM Ration @ 1:1
RAM Freq @ 475MHz DDRII-950
RAM @ 1.9V @ 5-5-5-15
MCH @ +.1V

ORTHOS Stable
3DMark 06 Score: 14086

Temps:
Idle @ ~27C
Load @ ~55C


 

MarcVenice

Moderator Emeritus <br>
Apr 2, 2007
5,664
0
0
Well, he has cas5 ddr2 800mhz ram, if his ram doesn't take kindly to overclocking getting anywhere past an FSB of 400 might prove difficult.
 

downhiller80

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,353
0
0
Right, my gigabyte bios has something called "performance enhance" with the options "standard, turbo [default] and extreme". What does this actually do?

Obviously I should have tried turning it off before, and now I've put it on "standard" I've just booted at 3.4GHz (8x425) no issues at all with speedstep still on and all voltages normal.

edit: ah I see my memory timings are now 5-6-6-16 instead of the G.Skill's rated 5-5-5-15. So putting it on standard actually makes it SLOWER than stock. On this board there seems to be no way to manual adjust memory timings that I can see?
 

downhiller80

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,353
0
0
3.6 stable (well, passes an hour, will obviously test more rigorously when I'm settled!)

3.7 boots quite happily too :D

Still got stock voltage on everything bar the proc @ 1.45v (CPUz reports 1.424V/1.408V under load)
 

WaTaGuMp

Lifer
May 10, 2001
21,207
2,506
126
Originally posted by: sebfrost
3.6 stable (well, passes an hour, will obviously test more rigorously when I'm settled!)

3.7 boots quite happily too :D

Still got stock voltage on everything bar the proc @ 1.45v (CPUz reports 1.424V/1.408V under load)

See they do work. :)
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,572
10,208
126
Originally posted by: sebfrost
edit: ah I see my memory timings are now 5-6-6-16 instead of the G.Skill's rated 5-5-5-15. So putting it on standard actually makes it SLOWER than stock. On this board there seems to be no way to manual adjust memory timings that I can see?
Hit CTRL+F1 at the main bios menu screen to active the hidden settings.