Originally posted by: Fardor
Is it always necessary to get a better cooler for overclocking, or when people say "stock" does it include the CPU cooler (as in, they didn't get a replacement).
I don't need to get up to like 3.0, even like 2.4 would be cool.
For a meager 200MHz increase, no, you don't need better cooling. You can probably even undervolt your CPU, if you wanted. No idea why you'd overclock to 2.4GHz when it runs at 2.2GHz stock. It's not likely you'll see much improvement with the extra 200MHz. I reckon you could probably reach up to 3.0GHz on stock cooling.Originally posted by: Fardor
Is it always necessary to get a better cooler for overclocking, or when people say "stock" does it include the CPU cooler (as in, they didn't get a replacement).
I don't need to get up to like 3.0, even like 2.4 would be cool.