Oh, and a 12000 BTU A/C.
depending on how often its being used, I would suspect that its responsible for nice part of your electricity bill.
Oh, and a 12000 BTU A/C.
I have 3 other similar systems, and all running F@H 24/7, and my power bill is only $200 a month.
Drop your cpu to the lowest voltage you can stably run at stock speeds. 25% + reduction in vcore is not unheard of, and possibly better. You can literally cut your cpu's power consumption in half if you have a decent chip.
$200 just for your DC systems?
Just saying...
No wonder my electric bill is $95/mo for a single person. Overclocked CPU. Overclocked GPU. F@H running 24/7.
I recently borrowed some KAW meters, and hooked them up to my desktop rig.
Q9300 @ 3.0, stock voltage, GTX460 1GB (715Mhz stock OC), and a KDS 26" LCD.
LCD 59-63W
Idle at desktop: 96W
F@H GPU: 194W
OCCT PSU test: 353W (CPU overheated > 85C! GPU temp was like 83-84C)
I pay $0.15 per KWh.
I get 10K PPD in F@H on the GPU.
Just saying...
No wonder my electric bill is $95/mo for a single person. Overclocked CPU. Overclocked GPU. F@H running 24/7.
The sweet-spot for CPUs, as far as power consumption, is within specifications. Overclocking, especially increasing voltage, reduces performance/watt.
I guess I'm getting more power-sensitive in my old age.
Hang on, so after spending all that money on green PC's, you still load them 24/7?...No wonder my electric bill is $95/mo for a single person. Overclocked CPU. Overclocked GPU. F@H running 24/7.
I was talking about my 45nm C2Q Q9300 chips
During the winter, I have to leave my windows open, in order to maintain normal room temperature (otherwise too hot if I close the windows). Oh, and a 12000 BTU A/C, it fits in a box below the window that was built-in to my apt. (which seems to be losing the battle, as I'm watching my thermostat creep subtly up, after turning on the 2nd GTX460 for F@H.)
Actually the sweet spot would be aggressively underclocked and undervolted. Making your CPU 1/2 as fast doesn't use 1/2 as much power, but more like 1/3 or 1/4 as much power.The sweet-spot for CPUs, as far as power consumption, is within specifications. Overclocking, especially increasing voltage, reduces performance/watt.
I do this too. Folding completely stops on all computers when spring/summer begin. I live in a condo and it gets incredibly hot in summer. I can deal with melting while I'm awake, but it's close to impossible to sleep without running the air conditioner all night. The last thing I want to do is put the computers against the air conditioner. Not only do I pay for the electricity used by the computers, but I pay a second time for the air conditioner to remove the heat generated by the computers!When the chill starts to set in ahead of the impending deep freeze, I for one take solace in pumping as many kWh as I can through billions of transistors instead of just dumb resistors.
I think it is a fair point about the sweet spot. I realized this when overclocking my i7-4790K. On stock it will draw around 90W according to HWInfo64 during Prime95. That is with a 4,2 GHz on all cores. Overclocking to a stable 4,8 GHz (which really is only a meager 600 MHz increase) with 1.35V nets a power draw from around 180W at peak. So essentially double the power draw for only 600 MHz more. It's save to assume that Haswell has it's sweet spot around 4,3-4,4 GHz.
	