• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Overclocked 1.6A/1.8A Sandra Scores. Let's see 'em!

doh
i didn't know you meant Pentium 4🙁😱


<< Overclocked 1.6A/1.8A Sandra Scores. Let's see 'em! >>


if your private message was enabled i would have sent you a PM sorry, i guess i am a newbie still😱
 


<< ok im a Moron,how do i do the screenshots,and get them here??
my ram test was ram int 2084,,float 2014
epox 8kha+ 2 sticks crucial 256 DDR 1.4 tbird 144 fsb
cpu arithmetic.. dhrystone 4179 mips whetstone fpu 2064 mflops... >>




Last time I checked the title of this thread it was for PENTIUM 4 1.6A and 1.8A CPUs dummy 😉

To take a screenshot of a single window you press Alt PrintScreen then paste it into Photoshop or Paint or whatever
 
I just finished my update to asus p4s333 board: no pics yet...but here are some scores

1.8a@2.4ghz with 133fsb and 4:5ratio for memory w/ pc2700 modules so it should be 333mhz

sandra alu/fpu: 4658/2956
multimedia: 9540/11641
memory : 2526/2525

1.62-1.64v
Prime95 all night

1.8a@2.45ghz w/ 136fsb...ratio is 1:1...haven't upgraded bios yet to new 4:5 ratio above 133fsb

sandra alu/fpu: 4720/3015
multimedia: 9727/11866
memory: 2045/2045

1.625v set failed prime 1.65v ran steady for a few hours...haven't fully tested it

I tried 1.8a@2.5ghz w/139fsb ran no scores though

prime failed immediately at 1.65v
I bumped it to 1.675v and it was steady for 1 hour (before I stopped it), but I think I want to be sub 1.65v until I hear otherwise...


Heat doesn't seen to be issue as I have new avc hsf and as2, and my idle temps were at 38c in bios...asus probe never took me over 47c at 1.675v so I don't know if that sounds right...maybe???

I need a 3:4 ratio for 133 or over...I think scores would be 7 percent better and near 2700....
 
I'm using an MSI 645 Ultra(Sis645 chipset) with a 1.8a,stock HSF, and 256mb Crucial DDR.

Some benchmarks at 2.4 gig(133fsb,333memoryspeed, 4:5 fsb/memory ratio,cas 2.5)
Sandra 2002
memory scores....2447/2426
CPU multimedia...9456/11528
CPU arithmetic......4502 1430/2938
3Dmark2001se .....8090 (GeForce3 ti200 at 220/500)


Some benchmarks at 2.52 gig(140fsb,355memory speed, 4:5 fsb/memory ratio,cas 2.5)
Sandra 2002
memory scores....2547/2549
CPU multimedia...9933/12119
CPU arithmetic......4721 1502/3087
3Dmark2001se .....8283 (GeForce3 ti200 at 220/500)
 
1.6a @ 2.32ghz w/ p4s3333 <- I LOVE THIS MOFO!!!!
Nvidia GF3 Ti200 <- This is bad arse too.. 🙂
256 DDR Corsair (4:5)

CPU MM : 9214/11212
CPU Arith : 4466 / 1216:2846
Memory : 2718/2718

3dmark2001se @default: 7508

Man.. I don't really care what these benchmarks say.. but wow.. this baby is so fast when loading my apps up. It takes a couple of seconds to load photoshop6.0 !!! (on my 1.8ghz RDRam Dell ~11 sec!)
 
updated:

p4 1.8a@2.52ghz (1.775v)

sandra cpu:4837/3071
sandra multimedia: 9904/12214
sandra memory: 2598/2596
 
1.8a running at 150x18@2700
Asus P4S333
ChiefTech 420w
crucial 512mb pc2100 running at speed
1.65v core voltage

sandra cpu:4980/3281
sandra multimedia: 10627/13088
sandra memory: 2233/2233

i think the only thing that's holding it back... is the ram.

i should really get kingmax pc2700
 
updated again:

p4 1.8@2.574ghz (143fsb) 1.8v

sandra cpu:4916/3135
sandra memory: 2652/2647

not prime95 tested, but it also ran pcmark2002 test....

p4 1.8@2.609ghz (145fsb) 1.8v

sandra cpu:4988/3186
sandra memory: 2689/2685

not prime95 tested, but it would get errors in pcmark2002

waiting on new PS to help stability at 1.75-1.8v


 
Mines are here

It's stable@2133@1.575v and the @1.675 it can do 2.26Ghz. I can't monitor the temps in windows but the heatsink is hardly lukewarm. The memory is running @166 2-2-3

 


<< I especially like the RAM scores, RAMBUS better watch its back! >>



You would be 1000 points higher than the scores you show if you were running RAMBUS. The spread grows wider as the clock speed increases.
 
Asus P4S333
1.6a at 2240 (16x140) at 1.55v
DDR at 4:5 ratio and 2.7v (2 sticks of Crucial 256mb PC2100 CL2.5)
Stock Intel cooling
Enermax 431w PS

Sorry, I only have the memory scores until tomorrow when I can get home

Memory Scores
 
1.6a@2.133ghz
Asus P4B266-C
Kingston 256mb PC2100 Ram

CPU: 4089MIPS
1115/2581MFLOPS

Cpu Multimedia : 8444 it/s
10334 it/s

Memory: Int 2018
Float 2020


Why is my memory suck? I have it the 2-2-2-5! How do i enable that other option other than 1:1?
 
Drop your FSB to 132. At 133 the board locks the memory speed to 1:1. I'm actually on hold trying to talk to Asus tech support even as I type this to ask them about this, as well as other issues.

At 132 FSB you'll still be at 2.11Ghz, but your RAM speed can be at 351Mhz by using the 3:4 divider, IF your RAM can go that fast.
 
dual p3 1ghz each

CPU: 6089MIPS
8581MFLOPS

Cpu Multimedia : 14,325it/s
16324 it/s


mem-i prefer to leave tis one out but o well

Memory: Int 803
Float 769
🙁
 
I don't have any scores on hand except the memory scores, but here we go:

P4 1.6a@2.13 (16x133)
P4S333
Crucial 2100 DDR 2.5-3-3-6@166 (4/5 clock/ram ratio)
Runs at about 42 degrees celcius at full prime95 load...
heatsink is lapped, and uses AS2

My memory scores differ greatly between 2-2-2-5@133 (score=about 2050)

and 2.5-3-3-6@166 (score=about 2450)

However, I cannot do both and get Prime 95 to run stable for very long at all.
So I choose to keep the higher mark, with the RAM clock set faster...

By the way, I have the Asus IPanel, and it is great. It lets me know what is going on
without relying on the Asus hardware monitoring software...although it seems to be accurate as well.

 
where do i get the sandra test? and any other tests that are used widely. thanks... really wanna compare my system to the rest of you guys...
 


<< RAMBUS better watch its back! >>


1.6A at 133 fsb
Th7-2 RDRAM at 133*4
RAM scores are both about 3400
Sorry, I don't have any pic hosting website.
 
NO...He probably means 3400...PC1066 rdram is shown at most sites to be able to run 3300mb/s of bandwidth...


Too bad that most things don't take advantage of that bandwidth....If so that should definitely have helped the lackluster p4 performance overtake amd and its much lower bandwidth potential....

You go ahead and live by your rdram scores...Like I said too bad real world performance doesn't reflect that synthetic benchmark....HAHA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top