overclock hard drive

HFS+

Senior member
Dec 19, 2011
216
0
0
is it possible to overclock a hard drive? Like make the rotaional speed faster?
 

greenhawk

Platinum Member
Feb 23, 2011
2,007
0
71
the rotational speed would require several changes to the drive itself, though IIRC it is not possible for the average person.

It use to be possible with IDE drives to a limited extent as the clock that drove the transfer could be tweaked up a few percent, but that effected buffer to host speeds. Sata separated the clock so not a option.

You might be able to boost the power of the head seeking, but you will suffer in over shooting your desired track more often, so loosing performance overall..

of course, replacing it with a faster drive would be faster and cheaper. Even changing to a SSD would be a option to get a faster drive.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Swap in a Dremel motor.
 

Zorander

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2010
1,143
1
81
Even if such a thing were possible, latency would most likely suffer exponentially.
 

chubbyfatazn

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2006
1,617
35
91
Put a bunch of stickers on it, preferably those depicting characters from My Little Pony. Make sure the PCB isn't red, black, blue, purple, or teal. Rainbow PCBs denote maximum rotational speed. Also, my porn drive seems to run faster than all of my other drives. Maybe that's because its rotational speed is 88 mph...

/buy an SSD
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
2,997
126
Yep, short stroke it. Also put any data that needs fast access (OS/applications, etc) on the outer partition.
 

PandaBear

Golden Member
Aug 23, 2000
1,375
1
81
You cannot make anything that moves faster as a consumer. Everything inside the drive is actually analog and that means they are all tested and calibrated like any delicate machine.

What you can do, like others said, is to short stroke it by having small partition up front for your most speed sensitive data and then the not so critical data at the end. I raid 0ed 2 old drive together and move the program partition up front, and get a noticeable speed improvement.
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
And, technically, you cannot overclock something that is not clocked in the first place. The short stroke idea can speed up access to data.
 

ShadowVVL

Senior member
May 1, 2010
758
0
71
I don't see why they dont make disks short stroked with 320gb or so only on the outer edge.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
I don't see why they dont make disks short stroked with 320gb or so only on the outer edge.

It's called a Cheetah and VelociRaptor, hence why those drives are only 2.5" to begin with. Using the outer tracks of large diameter platters destroys rotational latency.
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
2,997
126
I don't see why they dont make disks short stroked with 320gb or so only on the outer edge.
That’s pointless for both the customer and the manufacturer. Consider a 640GB drive short-stroked to 320GB.

The manufacturer can’t reduce the price since the drive needs the same number of platters and heads to be short-stroked. So the customer pays for a 640GB drive but only gets 320GB capacity.

Better to ship the original 640GB and let the customer choose whether to short-stroke it or use the full capacity.

And contrary to popular opinion, smaller drives in the same series are not usually derived by short-stroking. They’re normally made by using fewer platters, fewer heads (i.e. some sides of platters are not used), and/or lower platter density. In those cases the manufacture can pass on the savings to the customer.
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
2,997
126
It's called a Cheetah and VelociRaptor, hence why those drives are only 2.5" to begin with. Using the outer tracks of large diameter platters destroys rotational latency.
That doesn’t make any sense. Also by “destroys” do you mean increases or decreases?

Short-stroking is done by keeping the platter radius the same but preventing the head from travelling as far inwards. If you reduce the radius the outer velocity reduces too, so you aren’t short-stroking anything.

Now, if the platters are the same radius then it would be pointless (and even potentially impossible) to use a 2.5” form factor.

My understanding is that 2.5” drives actually have a smaller platter radius than 3.5” drives, and this is done to keep momentum and stability under control at the higher rotation speeds (i.e. there’s less total mass to spin).
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
It's called a Cheetah and VelociRaptor, hence why those drives are only 2.5" to begin with. Using the outer tracks of large diameter platters destroys rotational latency.

Rotational latency is the same across a drive. (Average latency is 1/2 rotation time which is the inverse of rotations per unit time.) And outer tracks are faster, hence "short stroking" which keeps the heads on the outer tracks.