OT---Math breakthrough! Now a work-log.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

petrusbroder

Elite Member
Nov 28, 2004
13,343
1,138
126
Well, this is a promising start. It took them quite some time to give you feed-back, and that is good. Please go on, your thoughts sound very good! :)
 

Evadman

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Feb 18, 2001
30,990
5
81
Keep going Rudy, I love the progress. too bad it wasn't accepted right away though.
 

Born2bwire

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2005
9,840
6
71
I moved my math and questions over to this forum.

I am hoping I will get a better reception than I got the last time I was there. I think they blocked me. I had to go to a different computer to get back in.

Thanks for all your encouragement!

Excellent, now I can stalk you there!

If they blocked you they would have banned your username too. If you are having trouble getting in from one computer I would send them an e-mail alerting them to it. Sometimes they block IP ranges to keep banned people from reregistering. I've had it happen before.
 

Rudy Toody

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2006
4,267
421
126
I have discovered that the series I'm so proud of is actually Oppermann's Conjecture (1882.) Oh, well.
 
Last edited:

petrusbroder

Elite Member
Nov 28, 2004
13,343
1,138
126
Well, that is one part of science: what you discover may have been known before - but not necessarily well documented. What does this mean for your proposals for the proofs? That it has been tried before? Or have you found a new application of the old conjecture?
 

Rudy Toody

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2006
4,267
421
126
Well, that is one part of science: what you discover may have been known before - but not necessarily well documented. What does this mean for your proposals for the proofs? That it has been tried before? Or have you found a new application of the old conjecture?

Actually, what I presented was a new way of looking at the problem. I forced convergence, which I haven't seen before. However, that doesn't help to prove that the series is infinite. I'm looking at some other approaches.

I did edit this page to let others know about it.

If I had had that info in December, I would have tried some other approach, (including putting Oppermann in the title of the paper.)
 
Last edited: