• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Oreck vacuums...

They work, they are light weight, but they cost 8 times what other equally performing vacuums cost. So is the light weight worth that much to you?
 
Our new housekeepers use Orecks. The first time they came, I had one vacuum with the oreck, and the other one vacuum behind her with our Dyson. They were amazed at how much more the Dyson picked up after they said the carpet was clean...BOTH have now purchased Dyson's for their own homes...
Spendy...yes, but IMO, worth it.
 
Consumer Reports said Orecks were the worst they tested, gave them their lowest rating. Said they were grossly overpriced
 
Originally posted by: walrus
Consumer Reports said Orecks were the worst they tested, gave them their lowest rating. Said they were grossly overpriced

Yes, I read the same report. CR rated the Hoover Windtunnel over the Dyson as well.
 
Sounds like Orecks go in the same category as Bose. Expensive product, tons of money into advertising, inferior product.
 
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Our new housekeepers use Orecks. The first time they came, I had one vacuum with the oreck, and the other one vacuum behind her with our Dyson. They were amazed at how much more the Dyson picked up after they said the carpet was clean...BOTH have now purchased Dyson's for their own homes...
Spendy...yes, but IMO, worth it.
Repeat that but have the Oreck after the Dyson. You'll be amazed at how much more the Oreck picks up after the Dyson supposedly cleaned it. That is a very common vacuum cleaner salesperson pitch. You have to vacuum one spot dozens of times to pick up everything (with ANY vacuum). The fact that one vacuum missed some is thus meaningless.
 
Back
Top