• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Orange stain second term results thread

Page 324 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I don't think Trump screaming at cameras that he fixed "affordability" and for people to stop whining about it is really going to work out, for the Republicans anyway.


https://www.gelliottmorris.com/p/new-poll-democrats-lead-the-2026

View attachment 134108
That chart is not easily understood. Is it just me? I doubt it. To understand it you must realize that the darker number represents disapproval in each case. Any figure in the lighter shade represents the approval percentage. The only question that garnered majority approval was Border security.
disapproval.jpg
 
Last edited:
Just another new low, as we are expected that this is normal behavior. Of course Trump thinks people who tell the truth about a person and publishes it should be murdered. It all good as MBS said it was a mistake.


President Trump welcomed Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, known as MBS, to the White House with an elaborate military display Tuesday, praising the crown prince and insisting the U.S.-Saudi relationship has never been better as the two countries look to sign major business and national security deals.
I will always firstly regard bin Salman as the autocrat who set a trap for a journalist critic and had him dismembered. IIRC, in an embassy of all places. 😳
 
Last edited:
I will always firstly regard bin Salman as the autocrat who set a trap for a journalist critic and had him dismembered. IIRC, in an embassy of all places. 😳
The embassy part is not surprising after all a country's embassy is ruled by that country law and in Saudi Arabia it is perfectly fine to chop people up on a whim. Just remember that if you ever step foot in a Saudi embasy 😉
 
The embassy part is not surprising after all a country's embassy is ruled by that country law and in Saudi Arabia it is perfectly fine to chop people up on a whim. Just remember that if you ever step foot in a Saudi embasy 😉
Embassies are not sovereign territory. The only thing holding up their relative standing are treaties and norms, and the feeling that if one host country substantially violates the space, the other host country will return the favor.

But yes, don't step foot into countries or places that put you under their jurisdiction if you think they may subject you to unlawful and arbitrary detention and/or dismemberment.
 
Big layoffs coming at my old job. I jumped ship at the right time apparently.
Guy I have worked with at volunteer org (college radio station) was USA EPA guy, he retired just before Trump gutted the EPA in his 1st term. Felt lucky to have retired when he did.

Caught this on FB just now, a FB friend from same volunteer org:

Occupy Democrats


podnsotrSe1h7a2588 41e945700c63lr649vom:m8b i270  tteMP9mN105 ·


BREAKING: NPR scores massive victory against Trump — CPB FORCED to restore $36 million deal after judge shreds their excuse.
Donald Trump’s crusade to kneecap public media just suffered a massive legal humiliation — and it’s one that exposes the breathtaking corruption behind his attempts to silence reporters who refuse to bow to him.
On Monday, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting quietly crawled back to court and agreed to revive a $36 million contract with NPR — the very contract it killed after intense pressure from the Trump White House.
This reversal didn’t happen because CPB suddenly rediscovered its mission. It happened because a federal judge all but laughed CPB’s defense out of the courtroom.
Judge Randolph Moss told CPB lawyers point-blank: their story wasn’t credible. Their excuse? That they suddenly dumped NPR to “foster digital innovation.”
Sure. Totally normal to discover a passion for innovation the day after a top Trump official told them not to “do business with NPR.”
The truth spilled out in depositions: CPB’s board chair and executives met with a White House budget officer who openly declared her “intense dislike for NPR.” And within 48 hours, CPB reversed a decades-long partnership — clearly terrified of a president hell-bent on censoring journalists who report facts he doesn’t like.
And yet, in its court filing, CPB still pretends it did nothing wrong.
Yeah, right.
This entire fiasco happened because Trump turned public broadcasting into his newest culture-war punching bag. He smeared NPR and PBS as “radical, woke propaganda disguised as ‘news’” — because nothing triggers him more than reporters who can read, ask questions, or use verified information.
Then he went further: on May 1, he signed an executive order banning all federal money from going to NPR and PBS. That’s right — the self-proclaimed defender of “free speech” used government power to defund news organizations for reporting the truth.
NPR sued, alongside local stations. And CPB — the nonprofit created by Congress to protect public media from political interference — folded like a wet paper towel.
But CPB’s cowardice didn’t save it. Instead, the courts forced it to admit that Trump’s executive order was exactly the kind of political interference the law was designed to prevent.
Meanwhile, Trump’s allies in Congress took it even further, rescinding all $1.1 billion in future public broadcasting funds. The result? Layoffs at PBS, financial strain at NPR, and local stations across America left fighting for survival — all because Trump can’t stand journalism that doesn’t flatter him.
And now, the attempted purge has collapsed under the weight of its own corruption:
CPB is restoring the $36 million deal.
The judge is preparing to hear NPR’s First Amendment case.
And the Trump administration’s effort to silence public media is on track to become yet another spectacular legal backfire.
This isn’t just a victory for NPR. It’s a victory for the First Amendment, local journalism, and every community that depends on public media for real news — not propaganda.
Trump tried to defund the truth. The courts just told him: Not today. Not ever.
Please like and share if you support NPR and PBS!
 
Last edited:
Man, I was wondering how they got a grand jury to sign off on an indictment that barely any prosecutor at DOJ would endorse. So how could they get away with this?
 
Man, I was wondering how they got a grand jury to sign off on an indictment that barely any prosecutor at DOJ would endorse. So how could they get away with this?
I believe the grand jury signed off on one 3 count one, where they rejected the first count. The indictment in question is one where prosecutors appear to have struck the first count altogether, except they didn't go to the grand jury for that one.
 
This was entirely predictable—a January 6 rioter pardoned by Trump has been arrested for further criming…and yes of course it’s for diddling little boys.

“[Victim’s mother] said she asked her son about the messages and also asked if Johnson had “done or said anything inappropriate” to which she said her son told her “that between April 1 2024 and October 2024” Johnson had “molested him three times”, beginning when he was 11 years old.

The report also alleges that Johnson told the child that “he was pardoned for storming the Capitol on January 6, 2021, and he was being awarded $10,000,000 as a result of being a ‘jan 6er’” and that he would be “putting him in his will to take any money he had left over”.

Investigators state that “this tactic was believed to be used to keep” the child “from exposing what Andrew had done to him”.


Besides Epstein, the Sex Offender in Chief has really gone out of his way to enable these child sexual predators: https://www.wbaltv.com/article/fbi-shift-immigration-sets-child-exploitation-cases-back/66347574
 
This was entirely predictable—a January 6 rioter pardoned by Trump has been arrested for further criming…and yes of course it’s for child sexual abuse.


Besides Epstein, the Sex Offender in Chief has really gone out of his way to enable these child sexual predators: https://www.wbaltv.com/article/fbi-shift-immigration-sets-child-exploitation-cases-back/66347574

This story has an even more fucked up part if that is possible.

The report also alleges that Johnson told the child that “he was pardoned for storming the Capitol on January 6, 2021, and he was being awarded $10,000,000 as a result of being a ‘jan 6er’” and that he would be “putting him in his will to take any money he had left over”.
 
That chart is not easily understood. Is it just me? I doubt it. To understand it you must realize that the darker number represents disapproval in each case. Any figure in the lighter shade represents the approval percentage. The only question that garnered majority approval was Border security.
View attachment 134128
The foreign policy item is a real stunner to me.
 
This story has an even more fucked up part if that is possible.
Yeah, just edited my post. Really fucked up manipulation there. I should also clarify that the perp was *not* locked up when pardoned annd the alleged misconduct occurred in 2024, so it’s not like Trump released him from lockup or anything like that…but still bad. Makes me wonder about that chart from earlier…IMG_2529.jpeg
 
Only the best in Trump's DOJ, lol

IMO, any attorney who would represent Trump in any capacity has a permanent stain on their resume. Now, some clients would prefer legal representation from someone with stains on their resume. Be wary of the Law. Lenny Bruce said "the only justice in the Halls of Justice is in the halls." I saw him in person one time, speaking on stage at an auditorium at UCLA. I don't think he spoke about anything other than his ongoing travails in the courts.
 
Last edited:
The foreign policy item is a real stunner to me.
People are largely stupid about that. Now 52 against versus 42 for is still tilted against significantly.
Doh, got it backwards. NM
Oh, OK...

See, I said that chart is hell of confusing to someone not breaking it down logically. It took me a few minutes and if it were not for the @K1052 remarks I wouldn't have. The way that chart is shown is dumb dumb dumb.
 
Back
Top