Orange stain second term results thread

Page 235 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Dec 10, 2005
28,050
12,659
136

I'm not an economist. Is it bad when it seems that they might revise jobs down by another few hundred thousand?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
4,197
3,531
136
Nope, it's 7.


Ok. This is what I remember

The FOMC’s 12 voting members consist of seven Fed governors, who are all picked by a president, confirmed by the Senate and serve 14-year terms, along with five regional Fed presidents, who are selected by their own boards. There are 12 regional Fed presidents overall, so they largely rotate in and out each year as FOMC voters.


 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
25,739
15,218
136
On the potential of pardoning Diddy..


Its the subtext Luke is arguing here. Damn. The realization of how far away from the rule of law the US has come in just half a year... and is governed by the whims of a true narcissist king wannabe.

I know that we cant dismiss us democracy before actual elections is fucked over proper... but it does seem like a formality at this point
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,989
9,870
136
Impeachments? What impeachments?


 
  • Haha
Reactions: hal2kilo

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,036
44,970
136
Look I'm not mad that presidents change things about the WH, I'm mad that it looks like cheap builder ass and will throw off an insane amount of glare on a sunny day.

ass.jpg
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,050
12,659
136
Look I'm not mad that presidents change things about the WH, I'm mad that it looks like cheap builder ass and will throw off an insane amount of glare on a sunny day.

View attachment 128177
I'm generally not mad at changes, but it's pretty ridiculous that he is treating the WH like he owns it. He's merely a tenant. Big changes should be made in consultation with the representatives of the people.

Also, where is the congressional authorization and appropriation for all this construction on our house?
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,036
44,970
136
I'm generally not mad at changes, but it's pretty ridiculous that he is treating the WH like he owns it. He's merely a tenant. Big changes should be made in consultation with the representatives of the people.

Also, where is the congressional authorization and appropriation for all this construction on our house?

Since the Republican majority and SCOTUS does nothing but slobber all over him such approval is inconsequential.I assume the new east wing ballroom space will be paid for by whichever foreign country is up next to bribe him but lacks a convenient 747 to do it with.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,036
44,970
136
Relatedly if I got my way and we had a PM instead of a President I'd be quite happy to turn the WH into a museum and make the PM live in Blair House.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511
Dec 10, 2005
28,050
12,659
136
Since the Republican majority and SCOTUS does nothing but slobber all over him such approval is inconsequential.I assume the new east wing ballroom space will be paid for by whichever foreign country is up next to bribe him but lacks a convenient 747 to do it with.
Well, you know, it's only a bribe if it comes in a cartoonishly labeled bag ("Bribery $$$$") and the recipient says "I will now do X official action because you gave me this money".
 

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
6,748
1,781
136
Look I'm not mad that presidents change things about the WH, I'm mad that it looks like cheap builder ass and will throw off an insane amount of glare on a sunny day.

View attachment 128177
Rumour is he did that monstrosity because he kept tripping.... though i will admit the change is rather poor taste and pathetic as the person who currently occupies the white house.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,989
9,870
136
Relatedly if I got my way and we had a PM instead of a President I'd be quite happy to turn the WH into a museum and make the PM live in Blair House.

I never had particularly strong opinions about Parliamentary vs Presidential systems, before. But current events have really made me lean towards preferring the former.

I don't know much about Constitutional theories, but seems like the better system is to have a parliament with some sort of figure-head President as head-of-state (as opposed to the Royal circus freakshow we have in the UK, which I certainly wouldn't recommend to anyone - as well as the frequent utter-ludicrousness of it, the worrying part is the range of potentially dictatorial powers invested in 'the Crown' that the Prime Minister gets to exercise on behalf of the monarch, or which an malevolent monarch might try to take back for themselves as an individual ).

Perhaps the precise Constitutional arrangements don't make a huge amount of difference, perhaps culture and economics are more important? But the direction of the US (not solely under Trump, but also the longer-term trend) really seems to suggest that systems with an active, political, President tend inexorably towards autocracy (as well as having problems with paralysis and deadlock).

Another example of the ludicrousness of our system (if only they'd go back to using massive great swords for this sort of thing).

 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,715
9,923
136
Trump projecting his own deep-seated bigotry again. Trump always calls black people “racist” when they criticize him

Screenshot_3-8-2025_1595_truthsocial.com.jpeg

Lol! ... "Low IQ individual" Same old stale predictable insults. Get some new material old man! t's always funny when Trump calls anyone else a "low IQ sleezebag". Especially considering his own history. Trump has to be the most thin-skinned, whiniest, snowflake who has ever lived.

Trump spending Sunday @ 2:00 AM getting triggered by watching a radio show host on a mindless Fox News show. An old man having a meltdown on social media in the wee hours of the morning. This is who you have as President America.
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,849
3,278
136
Trump projecting his own deep-seated bigotry again. Trump always calls black people “racist” when they criticize him

View attachment 128192

Lol! ... "Low IQ individual" Same old stale predictable insults. Get some new material old man! t's always funny when Trump calls anyone else a "low IQ sleezebag". Especially considering his own history. Trump has to be the most thin-skinned, whiniest, snowflake who has ever lived.

Trump spending Sunday @ 2:00 AM getting triggered by watching a radio show host on a mindless Fox News show. An old man having a meltdown on social media in the wee hours of the morning. This is who you have as President America.
I doubt trump has ever called a white person racist.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,989
9,870
136

One example:

At a recent cabinet meeting called to discuss the flooding tragedy in Texas, the war in Ukraine and Gaza, the bombing of Iran, and global tariffs, Trump went on a 13-minute monologue about how he had decorated the cabinet meeting room.

After talking about paintings which he said he had personally selected from “the vaults”, Trump said. “Look at those frames, you know, I’m a frame person, sometimes I like frames more than I like the pictures,” and added he had overseen the cleaning of some china.

As department heads, including the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, and the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, waited to be dismissed so they could go and do their jobs, Trump continued:

"Here we put out – you know these, these lamps have been very important actually, whether people love them or not but they’re if you see pictures like Pearl Harbor or Tora! Tora! Tora!, you see movies about the White House where wars are being discussed, oftentimes they’ll show those lamps or something like those lamps, something that looks like them. Probably not the reals, because I don’t think they’re allowed to – this is a very important room, this is a sacred room, and I don’t think they made movies from here.

You never know what they do. But they were missing, er, medallions. See the medallions on top? They had a chain going into the ceiling. And I said: ‘You can’t do that. You have to have a medallion.’ They said, ‘What’s a medallion?’ I said: ‘I’ll show you.’ And then we got some beautiful medallions, and you see them, they were put up there, makes the lamps look [inaudible] so we did these changes.

And when you think of it, the cost was almost nothing. We also painted the room a nice color, beige color, and it’s been really something. The only question is, will I gold-leaf the corners? You could maybe tell me. My cabinet could take a vote. You see the top-line moldings, and the only question is do you go and leaf it? Because you can’t paint it, if you paint it it won’t look good because they’ve never found a paint that looks like gold. You see that in the Oval Office.

Er, they’ve tried for years and years. Somebody could become very wealthy, but they’ve never found a paint that looks like gold. So painting is easy but it won’t look right.”

I can't help but read that in Grandpa Simpson's voice.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,050
12,659
136

One example:



I can't help but read that in Grandpa Simpson's voice.
"One trick is to tell stories that don't go anywhere. Like the time I caught the ferry to Shelbyville? I needed a new heel for m'shoe. So I decided to go to Morganville, which is what they called Shelbyville in those days. So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time. Now, to take the ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on 'em. "Gimme five bees for a quarter," you'd say. Now where were we? Oh, yeah. The important thing was that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time. They didn't have any white onions, because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones..."
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,050
12,659
136
This (that he isn't all there) has been clear since before the election. It was very clear he has trouble if you ever listened to his rambling speeches that lurch from topic to topic like a verbal diarrhea stream.

If anything, it's really infuriating that media types are now acting like this is something new, instead of something they helped to cover up by downplaying it or not reporting it at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaskalas

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,457
9,678
136
This (that he isn't all there) has been clear since before the election. It was very clear he has trouble if you ever listened to his rambling speeches that lurch from topic to topic like a verbal diarrhea stream.

If anything, it's really infuriating that media types are now acting like this is something new, instead of something they helped to cover up by downplaying it or not reporting it at all.
No kidding.

Evil incarnate, and MAGA Nazism aside....
Think Joe Biden was too frail and incoherent to be President?
Trump is all those things and more.

But the media only cares about appearances. And the campaign rally version of verbal diarrhea really appealed to the media and MAGA alike.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511