• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Orange stain second term results thread

Page 100 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
dainthomas said:
This is exactly one of the reasons why there was a furious scramble to unfire DOE people with Q clearances. As a group I'm sure they're not traitors, but when people lose their jobs and potentially their homes, they do what they need to for their families. And it only takes one.

This is also why when the USSR broke up, the United States made sure workers in those specialties were financially taken care of. So there would be no temptation to sell their knowledge to rogue states.
Click to expand...

Yup. You get it.
 
ch33zw1z said:
Plonk

slate.com

Supreme Court Rules the Clean Water Act Doesn’t Actually Require That Water Be Clean

Amy Coney Barrett was not having it.
slate.com slate.com

U want clean water America? Well, theres a free market solution for that
Click to expand...
When Barrett says in her finding the majority is full of shit (as will be our waterways) you know we in trouble. The SC literally ruled the Clean Water Act can not be used to ensure clean water.

At this point, I believe magat and the right just want it all to burn down so they can rise up to heaven, lynch the Woke Christ, take the throne, and ensure all “others” burn in hell. All heil white power. 🙄
 
ch33zw1z said:
Plonk

slate.com

Supreme Court Rules the Clean Water Act Doesn’t Actually Require That Water Be Clean

Amy Coney Barrett was not having it.
slate.com slate.com

U want clean water America? Well, theres a free market solution for that
Click to expand...
In the course of 3 years, we spent a total of 1/10th of our annual military budget on Ukraine.
Therefore America is too poor to shoulder the undue costs and heavy burden of clean water.

Stay tuned tomorrow for the NEXT thing Americans do not deserve. According to Republicans who need that money for their billionaire sycophants.
 
pmv said:
The inflationary effect of the tariffs hasn't hit yet, of course. Presumably Republicans will double-down on the denial, though?
Click to expand...

For the purposes of upcoming elections they need to be worried about 1) how angry the dem voters are and 2) how swing voters think things are going. So far the answer seems to be incandescent and pretty terribly.
 
K1052 said:
For the purposes of upcoming elections they need to be worried about 1) how angry the dem voters are and 2) how swing voters think things are going. So far the answer seems to be incandescent and pretty terribly.
Click to expand...

3) no need to hold elections anymore, declare emergency, martial law, etc

4) even if they do hold elections, the GOP controls the FEC and soon to be post office.

So there will be "elections."
 
Too bad the founding fathers didn’t include a recall provision. Let’s add one! Screw congress! Well, after they amend the constitution to give us voters more continuous power, that is!
 
RalphTheCow said:
Too bad the founding fathers didn’t include a recall provision. Let’s add one! Screw congress! Well, after they amend the constitution to give us voters more continuous power, that is!
Click to expand...
A recall provision would be bad.

Just make the president powerless and move all executive power to a prime minister. Then expand Congress with more seats, and get rid of FPTP voting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pmv
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top