According to a friend of mine who keep up with home theater tech, coax is a bit better for music and DD, while DTS sounds better via optical.
Originally posted by: Pariah
According to a friend of mine who keep up with home theater tech, coax is a bit better for music and DD, while DTS sounds better via optical.
That doesn't really make any sense
The trouble is (apparently) DACs are not essentially digital. Computers work in a digital way - 1s and 0s are processed into other 1s and 0s. These 1s and 0s are in fact imperfect analog signals which have voltages that are approximately 1s and 0s and which don't switch instantly, but imperfections in input don't have an effect in imperfections in output - that's the way computer circuits are. For this reason no-one asks how good a USB port is - if it works it works. (If we had 0.9 AND 0.9 evaluated as 0.8, say, and so on, a computer would fail almost instantly; instead it is evaluated as - about 1.)Originally posted by: Pariah
That doesn't really make any sense, since neither DD or DTS are music so to speak. They're only digitally encoded data that needs to be decoded by the appropriate decoder after it's already been transferred. Saying the transport is better for either format, while not for the other is like saying USB is better and more reliable for transferring data that is zipped, while firewire is better for data that is rar'd. Both are digital, either you get the file, or you don't, and 99.999% of the time, the data that is received is identical to the data that was sent.
Originally posted by: CSMR
The trouble is (apparently) DACs are not essentially digital. Computers work in a digital way - 1s and 0s are processed into other 1s and 0s. These 1s and 0s are in fact imperfect analog signals which have voltages that are approximately 1s and 0s and which don't switch instantly, but imperfections in input don't have an effect in imperfections in output - that's the way computer circuits are. For this reason no-one asks how good a USB port is - if it works it works. (If we had 0.9 AND 0.9 evaluated as 0.8, say, and so on, a computer would fail almost instantly; instead it is evaluated as - about 1.)Originally posted by: Pariah
That doesn't really make any sense, since neither DD or DTS are music so to speak. They're only digitally encoded data that needs to be decoded by the appropriate decoder after it's already been transferred. Saying the transport is better for either format, while not for the other is like saying USB is better and more reliable for transferring data that is zipped, while firewire is better for data that is rar'd. Both are digital, either you get the file, or you don't, and 99.999% of the time, the data that is received is identical to the data that was sent.
Simple DACs on the other hand effect - I believe - an analog transformation of the input. Now the input is "digital" but has to be considered as an analog signal - a jagged rather than smooth wave. Slight hanges in this signal have an effect on the output, unlike in computers.
Sore advanced DACs take the incoming data and treat it as digital, reclocking it and converting it to a better digital signal before converting it to analog in an analog way - here the quality of input will be irrelevant.
I am not an engineer or audio expert, so please correct me if I'm wrong.
As for whether optical or digital is better, in the past coaxial was considered superior, but optical equipment has improved apparently; there are advocates for both, but the difference isn't considered important.
Originally posted by: Pariah
At what point from the original reading from the disc to the final destination of the decoder, would a DTS or DD stream hit a DAC/ADC or anything else that would alter its original digital data?
Originally posted by: oneshot47
Originally posted by: Pariah
At what point from the original reading from the disc to the final destination of the decoder, would a DTS or DD stream hit a DAC/ADC or anything else that would alter its original digital data?
They dont.....im not sure who this is directed at though.
Originally posted by: supafly
I found one of these in my extra box of cables.. think it will work? I'd test it but all my stuff is packed up until Thursday.
It's unlikely that it's actual errors that cause bad dac-output: errors would appear as pops in the sound, just as if you took a wav file, altered one bit randomly and played it - there would be a pop. However when people talk about the quality of digital output and even digital cables they aren't referring to pops but to something considerably subtler! Many people in fact claim quite confidently that the quality of digital output makes a difference, and say what it is. If you're a skeptic I'm sure that blind tests must have been performed, which I'll look for if you really want.Originally posted by: oneshot47
Well, as a matter of fact DACs are "essentially digital'. In fact they can decode straight pcm (wave) streams just like your computer. All they do is sample the stream of bits coming from the source and convert a digitally represented waveform into an analog audio signal. Fancy cables are not required either, you can use any rca cable to do coax and it will sound fine. The reason people buy the big expensive cables (besides bragging rights for their so called "golden ears") is for better shielding against interference that can introduce errors into the stream. This is analogous to the 80 wire ide cables that are required for ata 133, they eliminate interference better than 40 wire cables. Optical cables obviously dont have this problem. In any case, no human can really tell a difference between one and the other. I use coax because the cables are cheaper (just a cheap long rca cable is good for me), and i am actually feeding a large expensive stereo system with it.
Originally posted by: CSMR
It's unlikely that it's actual errors that cause bad dac-output: errors would appear as pops in the sound, just as if you took a wav file, altered one bit randomly and played it - there would be a pop. However when people talk about the quality of digital output and even digital cables they aren't referring to pops but to something considerably subtler! Many people in fact claim quite confidently that the quality of digital output makes a difference, and say what it is. If you're a skeptic I'm sure that blind tests must have been performed, which I'll look for if you really want.Originally posted by: oneshot47
Well, as a matter of fact DACs are "essentially digital'. In fact they can decode straight pcm (wave) streams just like your computer. All they do is sample the stream of bits coming from the source and convert a digitally represented waveform into an analog audio signal. Fancy cables are not required either, you can use any rca cable to do coax and it will sound fine. The reason people buy the big expensive cables (besides bragging rights for their so called "golden ears") is for better shielding against interference that can introduce errors into the stream. This is analogous to the 80 wire ide cables that are required for ata 133, they eliminate interference better than 40 wire cables. Optical cables obviously dont have this problem. In any case, no human can really tell a difference between one and the other. I use coax because the cables are cheaper (just a cheap long rca cable is good for me), and i am actually feeding a large expensive stereo system with it.
(If the input can do non-pcm decoding, then it must pass through a computer-like process and so the quality of input doesn't matter (as long as it's not so inaccurate as to cause errors). DACs generally don't decode anything.)
Sorry; you are right. I wasn't attentive and didn't realise you were talking about DD and DTS only. I don't know what they are, but presumably they are some encoding scheme and the DAC would come in the next step in the chain, and the digital input quality, which is to the decoder not the DAC, would not matter. I was talking about normal digital transmission (unencoded PCM) direct to a DAC.Originally posted by: Pariah
At what point from the original reading from the disc to the final destination of the decoder, would a DTS or DD stream hit a DAC/ADC or anything else that would alter its original digital data?
Exactly, they don't. Which was my response to CSMR, who for some reason responded to my post, talking about DAC's and ADC's which were not relevant to my original post saying neither optical or coax are better or worse than the other for transferring DD or DTS streams which batmanuel claimed above.
I think you will hear it: those are the errors you sometimes get if you rip CDs with software that doesn't check well for errors. Isolated errors appear as clicks. Know a way to flip a bit randomly? I don't know how to do this in Windows.Originally posted by: oneshot47
Im not really sure what the point youre trying to make is 😕 For one, if you randomly flip one bit in a wave file, you wont here it. One sample in 44.1 thousand per second will be altered, you cant hear that. My point is that which cable you use doesnt really matter. Sure, theoretically one may be better than the other or whatever, but no speaker on earth can make those kinds of distinctions, and certainly not that anyone would be able to tell.
(have you and i discussed this kind of thing on here before CSMR?)