- Mar 24, 2005
- 2,055
- 9
- 81
Since the advent of s939 Opterons, folks have been raving about their 1MB L2 cache. What they don't mention is that their clock speeds are lower. Conventional wisdom seems to dismiss this problem as solved by overclocking, but is it really? Can a 1.8GHz Opteron 165 really match the top overclocking speed of the cheaper Athlon 64 X2 3800+? And can the 2.0GHz Opteron 146 really beat the cheaper 2.2GHz Athlon 64 3500+?
L2 cache certainly has an impact on performance, but a lot of applications don't seem to care if a CPU has 128KB or 1MB L2. If the maximum clock speed of a given CPU is greater than another, how much does the L2 size matter?
L2 cache certainly has an impact on performance, but a lot of applications don't seem to care if a CPU has 128KB or 1MB L2. If the maximum clock speed of a given CPU is greater than another, how much does the L2 size matter?