• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Opinions/Reviews ATI 9000 / 9000Pro vs NV MX440 / MX460

T

thorin

Diamond Member
Hey Guys,
I need info review details on these 4 chips (cards). Preferably 64MB DDR vs 64MB DDR (don't really care about 128MB models), and OCing is basically irrelevant.

Thorin
 
Only one reply overnight .... geez ppl you'd normally jump on a thread like this ..... is everyone sick or something?

Thorin
 
I'm just afraid to answer ANY post that has to do with the Radeon 9000.............

You know - once bitten, twice shy.. :frown:

I'd go with the 9000 over the MX440. 460 is a bit tougher.... the 9000 is probably better in overall image quality, the MX440/460 will have better AA (not AF)

They're both good choices either way. 9000 will get you a better 3DMark score because it's DX8 compliant.
 
Originally posted by: glugglug
MX = crap.

Better off with Geforce 2 (NOT MX)
Click to expand...

Pssyeah. :frown: Someone needs to do a little more homework before spouting off any more bad data.
Tom's VGA charts
The GF4 MX-440 beats the GF2-GTS and even pro every single time. Hands down (with the exception of the first benchmark where it only beats it by a nose.)
An MX-460 will only perform that much better.

The 9000 would be lower than the MX-460 but have a bit better image quality and enhanced web-video.

For game compatibility I'd lean to the MX-440 or 460 though.... I've heard a few issues exist with the 9000. Nothing too serious I hope... but it could just be nVidia fans stirring things up and I'm getting incorrect opinions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top