Opinions please! My portfolio layout - Graphics! (for university..)

Phuz

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2000
4,349
0
0
Its a little buggy, and poorly aligned because everything is in LAYERS. Its being coded as we speak in PHP by a buddy of mine.
This portfolio is complete, but lacking the obvious important ART gallery. That will be up soon (gallery), but I'm just looking for opinions on the rest of the site. The site is just as important as the rest of the portfolio, since they are getting physical prints of my work anyway.

Innovision.

Thanks folks.
 

rootaxs

Platinum Member
Oct 22, 2000
2,487
0
71
The design looks good however it's pretty heavy. Might want to start optimizing those images. Additionally, Times New Roman and the entire family doesn't really go well with web useage. Might want to use serif's.

Also try making some sort of subtle enclosure on the right side. In my eyes the info looks like it just got misplaced and the entire page seems unbalanced with a heavy graphic on the upper left corner and everything else on the right side.

With that out of the way, it's a pretty nifty site :)
 

Ornery

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,022
17
81
Very professional! I don't know anything about Java or PHP, but it seems to be coming along really well, IMHO!
 

MrHappyMonkey

Diamond Member
Mar 15, 2001
3,091
0
0
Phuz,

The 1st thing I notice is that the site looks to be optimized for 1024x768. This is a big NO NO. I would scale it down to atleast 800x600, or even better 640x480. Nothing messes up a beautiful site more than a verticle scroll bar. Also, I think you need to make the nav bar a bit more prominent. It kind of gets lost with the huge "ring" in the left hand corner of the site. Also, I would really consider breaking down the interface once the user has visit the homepage. Maybe make a little less elaborate interface for the "inner" pages in the site. The center "content" area (recent news) should be used for all the site content instead of the far right. I didn't even notice there was text there on the "about" page. I agree that some of the graphics need to be optmized down a bit for the narrow-band users.

I hope my comments didn't hurt your self-esteem too much ;)
 

Phuz

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2000
4,349
0
0
Yeah.. the common complaint has been the flow.. having the main graphics on the left and the main content on the right really doesn't flow to well does it?

MrHappyMonkey, one thing I've learnt is.. "cator to the masses". The masses are in 1024/768, and if they aren't, they don't deserve to see the page! I know it sounds rude, but the only people who are looking at this is design savvy people, and a few Unversities, and I they should most certainly be in 1024/768.

As for loading times, I understand it is a little harsh.. but I'm on a modem too, and its not too bad.. Its being viewed from a CD, though..

Thanks for the crit guys, I agree about the ballance of the page (it needs work). Also the nava bar needs to be made more visible.. or something.



<< I hope my comments didn't hurt your self-esteem too much >>



I'd have to have some first.. ;)

Ornery, thank you ;)


 

MrHappyMonkey

Diamond Member
Mar 15, 2001
3,091
0
0


<< MrHappyMonkey, one thing I've learnt is.. "cator to the masses". The masses are in 1024/768, and if they aren't, they don't deserve to see the page! I know it sounds rude, but the only people who are looking at this is design savvy people, and a few Unversities, and I they should most certainly be in 1024/768. >>



The statement that most people run 1024x768 is very wrong. Take a look at some browser stats. You will see that most people run 800x600 using Windows ME/98 (not too many people are "l337" enough to run Win2k like you think people should). As you said, "catering to the masses" is not what you are doing. You are effectivly eliminating 54% of your taget audience becuase you don't think they "deserve" to view your site correctly. This is like bulding a restuarant and only allowing a door way for people 4' and shorter. You are basicly telling everyone who is taller than 4' that they are not welcome in your establishment becuase they are not "l337" like yourself and run 1024x768+ resolution. If you want to do anything on the web, you will need to understand how the average "joe" uses his computer and configure your sites towards him and not the "l337 hax0rs with the high resolution and GeForce 4 video cards"
 

Soulflare

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2000
1,801
0
0
As others have stated the layout of the site seems to be quite unbalanced, and should
be resized for 800x600. A site design for 800x600 will still look fine at 1024x768,
whereas the opposite is rarely true.

I'd recommend sans-serif body type, and slightly larger type.

IMHO, the color-scheme seems a little drab.

 

TheDingo

Senior member
Sep 10, 2001
552
0
0
Another vote for image optimizing. Came up slow on this PC at work. If it's all going to be on CD though, then no biggie.
I would also suggest either lowering to 800x600, making two versions (high and low rez), or writing some code to make it dynamic. The good old Javascript screen size functions will help a lot.

I really like the style though. Has a really cool look and color scheme too it.
 

SinNisTeR

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2001
3,570
0
0
overall -- pretty good... you may want to reconsider color scheme as mentioned above. and its wayyyy slow. maybe a faster server and optimize graphics? is gallery not working?
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Change the first page so that the image is in the center not 200pixels from the left.

The rest looks good, would be nice if you could cut the main page width by 20-50pix, not everyone runs their browsers full screen :p

oh yeah.. on the main page, the news part doesnt fit the text, as in graphics form a box and text goes over the box.
 

Spudd

Golden Member
Aug 7, 2001
1,114
0
71
I don't think anyone has mentioned this yet, but you do have a link to your resume which will obviously be looked at by anyone interested in you. That being said, you have a lot of errors in grammar in the resume such as "companies" instead of "company's." Furthermore, your objective statement should be the first thing in your resume, and should definitely be toned down: you sound way too "uppity" which is not something an employer smiles upon. Other than that, fantastic job with the site. It's very professional in design, but should definitely be scaled to 800 x 600.
 

wolfsblood

Senior member
Apr 15, 2001
330
0
0
overall the layout looks nice but it loads kinda slow, might want to look for a better image host.
 

Phuz

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2000
4,349
0
0
Thanks folks!

You couldn't pay me to change the colours..

Is the text really that bad? I view it @ 1152/864.. Its in Franklin Gothic, and I didn't find anything else I liked... Aril and the likes (Serif) are too linear.

MrHappyMonkey, I appreciate it, but statistics don't mean anything to me.. Those aren't the people looking at my website. The design community is!
Your putting it way out of context.. firstly, my site isn't viewed by the public. Its not advertised, and can only be found through the grapevine. No search engine...


Slowness is because its running of a capped 16k cable connection.



<< Change the first page so that the image is in the center not 200pixels from the left. >>


Yeah, everything is way the F out of alignment.. everything is sitting in layers.. :(



<< don't think anyone has mentioned this yet, but you do have a link to your resume which will obviously be looked at by anyone interested in you. That being said, you have a lot of errors in grammar in the resume such as "companies" instead of "company's." Furthermore, your objective statement should be the first thing in your resume, and should definitely be toned down: you sound way too "uppity" which is not something an employer smiles upon. >>



Thanks very much. The whole thing should be rewritten, really. Its old.. and I just linked it up, but you are completely right. Thank you!
Its being coded properly.

I wish it were as easy as "scaling" it down to 800/600, but it isn't.. :(

Thanks folks!
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0


<< << Change the first page so that the image is in the center not 200pixels from the left. >>
Yeah, everything is way the F out of alignment.. everything is sitting in layers..
>>


do <div style="float:center"> for the layer
 

djs1w

Senior member
Apr 17, 2001
282
0
0
the font is small and hard to read. The upper left corner seems extremely "busy" when compared to the rest of the page.
 

notfred

Lifer
Feb 12, 2001
38,241
4
0
3d Studio MAX was so expensive that you could only afford a 17" monitor after buying it? ;)

It's a lot of eye cany, but not much organization. Nothing flows from one place to another. What are you going to do with the left edge of the page, leave it blank and just stretch that skinny litle text box down the center?

"Portoflio of Andrew Campbell"

I want a portoflio.


And you really need to break up some of those images. They're big.
 

royaldank

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2001
5,440
0
0


<< Is the text really that bad? I view it @ 1152/864.. Its in Franklin Gothic, and I didn't find anything else I liked... Aril and the likes (Serif) are too linear.

MrHappyMonkey, I appreciate it, but statistics don't mean anything to me.. Those aren't the people looking at my website. The design community is!
Your putting it way out of context.. firstly, my site isn't viewed by the public. Its not advertised, and can only be found through the grapevine. No search engine...
>>



You do realize that you are presenting yourself and your skills here. What people have said about the screen size isn't necessarilly all that important if you know who is viewing it. But you should realize that you are producing for the design community, and being in that community requires that you understand design techniques and common practice. It's these people that are aware of things like what size your site was designed for and so forth. They are the ones that on a daily basis have to design internet layouts and website graphics. You can either give them the, "Oh, he can design something in the highest resolution his computer will do, or he can design a workable, scalable website that looks pretty sweet no matter what the size." You say that the design community uses 1028x768 or higher and that's all your targeting. That's true, but it's those same people that understand most people use 800x600 or 600x480 and stuff needs to be designed with that in mind.

However, that is a mute point if your trying for printed art or printed design. Then, the website is more of a quick look at your skills rather than your skills in action. If that is the case, then the site is too graphic and should be simplified greatly. Since you wouldn't care what they think of your web design skills, why not make something simple and fast, while still attractive looking.

I don't mind the colors. Looks nice.

The main menu is kind of awkward. It's so busy with the graphics to the left of it and underneath, but then it just abruptly ends.

The box that pops up with the MAIN text is off center. Re-coding will probably fix that.

Probably should have the resume pop up in a new window. That way, they are still on your main page when they get done looking at your resume.

And, is there really a difference in ABOUT and your resume? You list programs you use on the ABOUT section, but they aren't on your resume. On your resume, I'm sure it would be better to list that you are familiar with 3DSM rather than writing about your interest in snowboarding. To continue on that, I'm seriously doubting that anyone looking at this site is going to care what computer you have or what is in it. Tools used should be replaced with 'Skills,' and then you should list all programs relative to design and art that you are somewhat familiar with.

Splash page looks nice. Centered will make it look even better, but that is in the re-code.

Overall, not a bad looking site from a layout standpoint. The menu could be touchd up and the right half the page could be filled with something interesting (page seems to die as you look left to right). But, one of the things about being a web designer is actually transforming a decent layout into somethig that works. It's making something scalable without saying, "Screw them if they don't use a certain resolution."

Hope some of these comments might help you. Didn't mean anything bad or offensive with any of them.

 

Electric Amish

Elite Member
Oct 11, 1999
23,578
1
0
I hope they'll be viewing it in IE. The layout has a few problems in Mozilla.

Also, the type is too small to read in 1600x1200. ;)

amish