blackangst1
Lifer
Good thing we didn't get stuck with that nutburger McSally.
Uh, she's a US Senator.
Good thing we didn't get stuck with that nutburger McSally.
What kind of moron would make McSally a Senator? The people of Arizona sure as heck didn't vote for her.Uh, she's a US Senator.
What kind of moron would make McSally a Senator? The people of Arizona sure as heck didn't vote for her.
Doug Ducey is that moron.
Going to be a real uphill one for her next year against Mark Kelly.
I’m pretty sure alt-right media in that state will muster up the chutzpah required to claim Kelly is abandoning his special needs wife for personal glory and/or “milking” a gun tragedy.
Well, hopefully the myriad of lawsuits will quash this before it gathers any steam.
I also think it's kind of an odd idea that society would just accept a super-minority having such outsized political power. If it ever got that bad a change would be demanded as not only would the states with 1/3rd of the Senate seats be home to 70% of the population, they would also probably be home to about 80-85% of the country's GDP.
Interestingly enough, Max Kennerly pointed out that the Founders did have what they thought was a solution for this problem but I doubt anyone, in particular anyone in that 30% population, would want to see. Their answer was for the larger states to wage economic warfare against the smaller ones until they capitulated.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed62.asp
So basically from the perspective of the founders the correct answer would be for the dense, liberal states to destroy the economies of the South and rural west in retaliation. This seems like a bad plan to me so it would probably just be better if we admitted a few more states.
Our big brain president has apparently decided to destroy the economy of Guatemala in a bid to stop migration.
View attachment 8770
Maybe we can overthrow their government and install a more friendly military dictatorship.
Maybe we can overthrow their government and install a more friendly military dictatorship.
Conservative Republicans have scuttled every attempt at bipartisan immigration reform for at least the last decade plus.
For some of them there is too much political value in not fixing the problem, others want to shape the demography of the country for electoral and racial reasons. This latter group has only grown with Trump now that nativism and white nationalism have been mainstreamed by a far right party. I think the prospects for bipartisan immigration reform are worse now than probably any point in my lifetime.
"Any tariffs on remittances would impact most those who live day-to-day," he added. "Guatemala does not have the resources or the capacity to be a 'safe country.' Guatemala does not even have the resources to attend to its own citizens."
Both parties have done this.
Both parties have done this.
Gawd. When was the last time Dems exploited nativism & white nationalism?
It was 50 years ago. The whole political geography has shifted. Southern Democrats became Republicans, and here we are.
Both parties have done this.
Nope. Both major attempts to fix immigration law over the last 20 years were scuttled by Republicans.
Why even bother to lie about things so easily proven?
BS Neither side is cooperating with the other except in Very Limited ways. Nothing of meaning is getting done.
Horse poop. They are currently refusing to fix the border now. So are the republicans.
BS Neither side is cooperating with the other except in Very Limited ways. Nothing of meaning is getting done.
Republican Conservatives blocked both Bush and Obama from accomplishing comprehensive immigration reform. These are facts.
If that "comprehensive immigration reform" entailed path to citizenship with no (or basically no) penalties then I'm glad they blocked it. We cannot allow those who broke our immigration laws to be rewarded for it, period full stop. The price to allow them to stay after breaking our laws needs to be significant and done in a way that's a very, very public demonstration that will deter others from doing the same in the future.