• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

OpenSolaris Dead?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Given the fact that Oracle just sued Google over Java, I don't think I'd invest in building something around an Oracle product.

Sounds like Oracle plans to become the next big patent troll.
 
http://wyang0.blogspot.com/2010/08/future-of-opensolaris.html

Looks like Oracle is putting their boot on it's throat, not that I'm too broken up about it. =)

Seems like the only choices are to follow Oracle's code releases and be perpetually behind, fork what they have and create their own separate OS or to focus on FreeBSD since ZFS has already been ported there.

But in any case it does look like OpenSolaris is effectively dead.
 
Is the BSD ZFS implementation any good? I keep hearing bad things about it.

I just read a thread at Ars talking a bit about that. It seems it works well on 64bit hardware, with lots of ram, but it can get flaky using small ram amounts. I don't think it was ever cleared up whether that was a ZFS issue, or a FreeBSD issue.
 
I just read a thread at Ars talking a bit about that. It seems it works well on 64bit hardware, with lots of ram, but it can get flaky using small ram amounts. I don't think it was ever cleared up whether that was a ZFS issue, or a FreeBSD issue.

That thread's where I stole that link from and what I got from it was that the problem was most likely with the FreeBSD kernel since ZFS has less issues on 32-bit Solaris.

But with Oracle owning Solaris now, FreeBSD seems to be the only free way for ZFS to live.
 
[...] with Oracle owning Solaris now, FreeBSD seems to be the only free way for ZFS to live.
Sorry for parsing your post, but I suppose it depends on the meaning of "free way".

I just downloaded the "free-of-charge", "time-unlimited version", of NexentaStor 3.x.

The license only allows 12 terabytes (TB) of used space. LoL!

Looks, walks, and quakes, like free ZFS to me... :awe:
 
Sorry for parsing your post, but I suppose it depends on the meaning of "free way".

I just downloaded the "free-of-charge", "time-unlimited version", of NexentaStor 3.x.

The license only allows 12 terabytes (TB) of used space. LoL!

Looks, walks, and quakes, like free ZFS to me... :awe:

My fear is that if they start making any money Oracle will sue them into oblivion. See google as a reference point.
 
Sorry for parsing your post, but I suppose it depends on the meaning of "free way".

I just downloaded the "free-of-charge", "time-unlimited version", of NexentaStor 3.x.

The license only allows 12 terabytes (TB) of used space. LoL!

Looks, walks, and quakes, like free ZFS to me... :awe:

And that product will most likely die or be horribly stagnant now that Oracle's not maintaining the OpenSolaris public code repo.
 
And that product will most likely die or be horribly stagnant now that Oracle's not maintaining the OpenSolaris public code repo.
Not really...

  • Sun begot Solaris
  • Solaris begot OpenSolaris
  • Oracle begot Sun
  • Nexenta begot NexentaStor

Nexenta will beget Illumos, son of OpenSolaris, and... that will complete the ring!

Thus, it matters not if Oracle maintains OpenSolaris.

Illumos will be the completion of OpenSolaris, and Nexenta will develop NexentaStor.

If you'll pardon the pun, am I not the only oracle that sees this? :awe:
 
Last edited:
Not really...

  • Sun begot Solaris
  • Solaris begot OpenSolaris
  • Oracle begot Sun
  • Nexenta begot NexentaStor

Nexenta will beget Illumos, son of OpenSolaris, and... that will complete the ring!

Thus, it matters not if Oracle maintains OpenSolaris.

Illumos will be the completion of OpenSolaris, and Nexenta will develop NexentaStor.

If you'll pardon the pun, am I not the only oracle that sees this? :awe:

IIRC Nextenta was already in a grey area because they're linking GPL'd code (i.e. dpkg) against a CDDL library (OpenSolaris' libc) which I don't think is legal.

And it does matter if Oracle keeps the OpenSolaris source open because if not, Illumos (man what a shitty name...) will get out of sync and eventually become incompatible with it meaning it'll just be yet another unix-like OS. And hopefully it'll fall into obscurity fairly quickly...
 
I think D'Amore has hatched a beautiful plot!

Basically, Oracle has two options:

  1. Sh!t
  2. Get off the pot.

It's the American Way!

Anyway, OpenSolaris will be around, in whatever form. It's NOT dead, by any means...
 
So, from what I have read, Oracle is going to be releasing (assuming free) builds of the next-gen Solaris periodically in a similar fashion to the Solaris Express builds of old?
 
So, from what I have read, Oracle is going to be releasing (assuming free) builds of the next-gen Solaris periodically in a similar fashion to the Solaris Express builds of old?

After binary releases in a half-hearted attempt to not look like total dicks.
 
All Hail... 😎

OpenIndiana

OpenIndiana is a continuation of the OpenSolaris operating system. It was conceived during the period of uncertainty following the Oracle takeover of Sun Microsystems, after several months passed with no binary updates made available to the public. The formation proved timely, as Oracle discontinued OpenSolaris soon after in favour of Solaris 11 Express, a binary distribution with a more closed development model to début later this year. OpenIndiana is part of the Illumos Foundation, and provides a true open-source community alternative to Solaris 11 and Solaris 11 Express, with an open development model and full community participation.
 
What ppl should be worried about is the future status of OpenOffice. 😉

That point hasn't escaped me. Do you know how hard it would be for independent development to continue if Oracle dropped support? I wonder if someone else, Canonical? could pick up the torch. It seems like an obvious fit to me.

Edit:
spelling
 
Last edited:
That point hasn't escaped me. Do you know how hard it would be for independent development to continue if Oracle dropped support? I wonder if someone else, Canonical? could pick up the torch. It seems like an obvious fit to me.

Edit:
spelling

Yea, I'm sure either them or RedHat would.
 
Back
Top