OOPS..stupid n00b....mom busted for hacking into school computer to change her daughters grades

Wheezer

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 1999
6,731
1
81
http://www.timesleader.com/Abi...s/ap?articleID=2413702

A high school secretary illegally changed grades in a school computer system to improve her daughter's class standing, according to criminal charges filed Thursday.

Caroline Maria McNeal of Huntingdon is accused of using the passwords of three co-workers without their knowledge to tamper with dozens of grades and test scores between May 2006 and July 2007 at Huntingdon Area High School in central Pennsylvania, the state attorney general's office said.

McNeal, 39, is alleged to have improved her daughter Brittany's grades and reduced those of two classmates to enhance Brittany's standing in the 2008 graduating class.

School officials corrected the grades before the students graduated, prosecutors said.

Attorney General Tom Corbett said the case involves "a serious violation of the public trust."

"Our citizens depend on people in public positions, including school employees, to protect the safety and security of these records and not use confidential information for their own benefit," Corbett said.

McNeal was charged with 29 counts of unlawful use of a computer and 29 counts of tampering with public records. Each count is a third-degree felony punishable by a maximum of seven years in prison and a $15,000 fine, said Nils Frederiksen, a spokesman for Corbett's office.

No telephone number was listed for Caroline McNeal. Brittany McNeal is not charged with any wrongdoing.

Jill Adams, the school district superintendent, said prosecutors have asked school officials not to comment publicly about the case.

"We would like to have it be finished, over and done," she said.

In all, McNeal is accused of altering nearly 200 scores and grades covering four school years.

The situation came to light in October 2007, when an employee of the high school guidance office discovered conflicting SAT scores for Brittany.

Scores provided directly by the College Board showed a cumulative score of 1370, while an unknown source had previously entered 1730, according to court papers.1

Further investigation revealed that the data had been entered from Caroline McNeal's computer starting more than a week before SAT scores for other students were entered.

Three other secretaries at the school told investigators they had shared their passwords with Caroline McNeal during vacations or other prolonged absences
 

arcenite

Lifer
Dec 9, 2001
10,660
7
81
The situation came to light in October 2007, when an employee of the high school guidance office discovered conflicting SAT scores for Brittany.

she got greedy
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,568
3,760
126
Scores provided directly by the College Board showed a cumulative score of 1370, while an unknown source had previously entered 1730, according to court papers.1 Further investigation revealed that the data had been entered from Caroline McNeal's computer starting more than a week before SAT scores for other students were entered.

Thats quite a change there. And a week before? Come on - use at least a little common sense
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
Originally posted by: Jeff7
We demand McNeal! STOP STALLING!

:music:
Single Female Lawyer
Fighting for her clients
Wearing sexy mini skirts
And being self-reliant

Single Female Lawyer
Having lots of sex
:music:
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: arcenite
The situation came to light in October 2007, when an employee of the high school guidance office discovered conflicting SAT scores for Brittany.

she got greedy

That happens often in life.
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
Originally posted by: Jeff7
We demand McNeal! STOP STALLING!

:music:
Single Female Lawyer
Fighting for her clients
Wearing sexy mini skirts
And being self-reliant

Single Female Lawyer
Having lots of sex
:music:

LRRR: This is an outrage! I demand to know what happened to the plucky lawyer and her compellingly short garment.

 

goog40

Diamond Member
Mar 16, 2000
4,198
1
0
What's the point in altering the high school's records of the SAT scores? Don't you have to have the College Board send the scores directly to the colleges when you apply anyways?

With a 1370 out of 2400 there's probably hundreds of students ahead of her in the class standings. I wonder why she chose to lower just those two classmates' scores.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,174
12,627
136
Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
Originally posted by: Jeff7
We demand McNeal! STOP STALLING!

:music:
Single Female Lawyer
Fighting for her clients
Wearing sexy mini skirts
And being self-reliant

Single Female Lawyer
Having lots of sex
:music:

:thumbsup:
 

andylawcc

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
18,183
3
81
Originally posted by: Exterous
Scores provided directly by the College Board showed a cumulative score of 1370, while an unknown source had previously entered 1730, according to court papers.1 Further investigation revealed that the data had been entered from Caroline McNeal's computer starting more than a week before SAT scores for other students were entered.

Thats quite a change there. And a week before? Come on - use at least a little common sense

1370 is pretty low to begin with.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Going from 1370 to 1730 is pretty clever though, looks like a regular typo.
I'm surprised they actually caught it, data correction like that is nearly impossible to catch with people's eyes.
 

RaistlinZ

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2001
7,470
9
91
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: Exterous
Scores provided directly by the College Board showed a cumulative score of 1370, while an unknown source had previously entered 1730, according to court papers.1 Further investigation revealed that the data had been entered from Caroline McNeal's computer starting more than a week before SAT scores for other students were entered.

Thats quite a change there. And a week before? Come on - use at least a little common sense

1370 is pretty low to begin with.

No kidding 1370 is pretty damn embarrassing. Even McDonalds would reject her job application what that kind of a score.
 

MrMatt

Banned
Mar 3, 2009
3,905
7
0
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: Exterous
Scores provided directly by the College Board showed a cumulative score of 1370, while an unknown source had previously entered 1730, according to court papers.1 Further investigation revealed that the data had been entered from Caroline McNeal's computer starting more than a week before SAT scores for other students were entered.

Thats quite a change there. And a week before? Come on - use at least a little common sense

1370 is pretty low to begin with.

No kidding 1370 is pretty damn embarrassing. Even McDonalds would reject her job application what that kind of a score.

is that on the old 1600 point one? or the new 2400 point one.

And look how old that story is, why is it just getting posted now. We're halfway through 2009.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: Exterous
Scores provided directly by the College Board showed a cumulative score of 1370, while an unknown source had previously entered 1730, according to court papers.1 Further investigation revealed that the data had been entered from Caroline McNeal's computer starting more than a week before SAT scores for other students were entered.

Thats quite a change there. And a week before? Come on - use at least a little common sense

1370 is pretty low to begin with.

No kidding 1370 is pretty damn embarrassing. Even McDonalds would reject her job application what that kind of a score.

I know nothing of the new SAT grade scale.. but I get that's almost half of 2400.. is that similar to scoring like a 900 on the old SAT?
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: Anonemous
for a minute there I thought the max SAT score was 1600, guess I'm too old... :(

Yes, me too. I guess 1,600 is the old scale.

<---- Old.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: Wheezer


Scores provided directly by the College Board showed a cumulative score of 1370, while an unknown source had previously entered 1730, according to court papers.1
[/quote]

thats a pretty terrible score lol.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: goog40
What's the point in altering the high school's records of the SAT scores? Don't you have to have the College Board send the scores directly to the colleges when you apply anyways?

With a 1370 out of 2400 there's probably hundreds of students ahead of her in the class standings. I wonder why she chose to lower just those two classmates' scores.

with a 1370 she probably was in the bottom quarter.
 

PlasmaBomb

Lifer
Nov 19, 2004
11,636
2
81
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: goog40
What's the point in altering the high school's records of the SAT scores? Don't you have to have the College Board send the scores directly to the colleges when you apply anyways?

With a 1370 out of 2400 there's probably hundreds of students ahead of her in the class standings. I wonder why she chose to lower just those two classmates' scores.

with a 1370 she probably was in the bottom quarter.

Close, she was about the bottom third...

Percentile.....Score
99+.............=2290
99...............=2200
98...............=2140
97...............=2100
88...............=1900
83...............=1800
78...............=1770
72...............=1700
61...............=1600
48...............=1500
36...............=1400
15...............=1200
4.................=1010
1...................=790
 

EMPshockwave82

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2003
3,012
2
0
Would have been cheaper in the long run to get a tutor for her child. It says that all grades were changed back before graduation and I really hope that is the case. I think she should have to pay fines of $500 to $1,000 per grade changed and serve tons of hours of community service. I'm not sure "up to 7 years in prison" is necessary. Personal fines and community service should fix the behavior.
 

venkman

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,950
11
81
I got a 1370 on my SATs also!!! Granted it was out of 1600 at the time. :)
 

venkman

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,950
11
81
Originally posted by: EMPshockwave82
Would have been cheaper in the long run to get a tutor for her child. It says that all grades were changed back before graduation and I really hope that is the case. I think she should have to pay fines of $500 to $1,000 per grade changed and serve tons of hours of community service. I'm not sure "up to 7 years in prison" is necessary. Personal fines and community service should fix the behavior.

Exactly, She is a non-violent offender and there is absolutely NO REASON a full capable working person should be a drain on the economy like this. Probation, Community service, fines, and possibly house arrest are all that is needed.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: goog40
What's the point in altering the high school's records of the SAT scores? Don't you have to have the College Board send the scores directly to the colleges when you apply anyways?

With a 1370 out of 2400 there's probably hundreds of students ahead of her in the class standings. I wonder why she chose to lower just those two classmates' scores.
Fortunately, criminals also tend to be stupid and shortsighted.