Oops! NPR agrees O'reilly interview not fair

[PainTrain]

Would you argue against that O'Reilly routinely uses similar aggressive interviewing practices on his guests? At a minimum it is a case of the pot and the kettle, which by default makes O'Reilly a sh2tty interviewer. Anyone who watches him and actually takes him seriously merely wants to have their own vindictive fantasies played out on TV I guess its something for them to eat their Hungry Jack meals to.

 

[Zebo]

Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
National Proletariate Radio -
last Communist propaganda organ


they are so ridiculously bias in there "news" reporting it's laughable.
they had a series of interviews with "foreigners" to get an idea of what the "world" thinks
about the united states.

they interviewed the french and germans....

give me a break....

Well BigDude, if you are insinuating NPR is bias I suggest you compare to FOX and who has more awards for *journalism.* No flag-worshipping fascist groups don't count, they must be peer-reviewed industry recongised awards. psst. I don't think FOX has ever won one😉 I mean they do get their "jounalists" from Inside Edition after all what can you expect. NPR leads.

 

[Lucky]

and npr does not have to worry about the commercial viability of their programs when they produce them. fox does. awards don't mean jack crap when one of the entities competing for them is publically subsidized.

that's not even touching the fact that fox's purpose does not include the sorts of programs NPR produces.

 

[PainTrain]

Originally posted by: Lucky
and npr does not have to worry about the commercial viability of their programs when they produce them. fox does. awards don't mean jack crap when one of the entities competing for them is publically subsidized.

that's not even touching the fact that fox's purpose does not include the sorts of programs NPR produces.

Journalistic integrity goes right out the damn window when money is on the line then I guess.

 

[Dari]

I met that NPR lady once. Her voice is awesome.

 

[Zebo]

Originally posted by: Lucky
and npr does not have to worry about the commercial viability of their programs when they produce them. fox does. awards don't mean jack crap when one of the entities competing for them is publically subsidized.

that's not even touching the fact that fox's purpose does not include the sorts of programs NPR produces.

I'm not sure the news should have "commerical viability" Lucky. It was always what you needed to hear in the past and every news program operated at a loss which was then subsidized by regular progamming, not by whos boinking whom in hollywood. Regaudless compare FOX to any other network if you wish ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN who also now have to have commerical viability and FOX is still the loser.

Popularity means nothing as far as quality of product they put out just like Popular Mechanics is'nt the #1 science publication in the world Science is.

I am still waiting to hear how any news network is "leftwing" one bit. They never talk about homeless or pro-labor and pro-consumer issues. All insteed are comtrolled by a few massive corporations all of whom have conservative economic agendas and seem to worship the overdog. Sure it's what sells but it's hardy left-wing.

 

[Zebo]

Originally posted by: Dari
I met that NPR lady once. Her voice is awesome.

How does she look dari? I must say I get a bit arosed by her voice too🙂 She's one woman you'd never leave the room cause you heard enough.😛

 

[Dari]

Originally posted by: Zebo

Originally posted by: Dari
I met that NPR lady once. Her voice is awesome.

How does she look dari? I must say I get a bit arosed by her voice too🙂 She's one woman you'd never leave the room cause you heard enough.😛

NOT Pretty

There is someone else that I've met that reads news to the blind. She's gorgeous and her voice is even better.

 

[Linflas]

Originally posted by: Zebo

Originally posted by: Dari
I met that NPR lady once. Her voice is awesome.

How does she look dari? I must say I get a bit arosed by her voice too🙂 She's one woman you'd never leave the room cause you heard enough.😛

Enjoy

 

[PatboyX]

Originally posted by: Lucky
a good interview? hardly. even the ombudsman will admit that it wasnt!

still all just opinion and ill hold to mine. i would have like to hear him answer her questions rather than flip out but she did what she could.

 

[Lucky]

I'm not sure the news should have "commerical viability" Lucky. It was always what you needed to hear in the past and every news program operated at a loss which was then subsidized by regular progamming, not by whos boinking whom in hollywood. Regaudless compare FOX to any other network if you wish ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN who also now have to have commerical viability and FOX is still the loser.

You completely missed my point. I was responding to a post that said in essence that since NPR has won so many more awards they must be better than fox. Well that's not exactly fair. NPR has a guaranteed revenue stream and can afford to both go outside the bounds and also make a few mistakes in the process of producing all these supposed award winning shows. The programming is also not forced to cater to certain demographics to obtain more advertising dollars either.

I am still waiting to hear how any news network is "leftwing" one bit. They never talk about homeless or pro-labor and pro-consumer issues. All insteed are comtrolled by a few massive corporations all of whom have conservative economic agendas and seem to worship the overdog. Sure it's what sells but it's hardy left-wing.

Well bring that up in another thread where it can be beaten to death again.

 

[0roo0roo]

simple fact is that if fox had the same ombudsman, oreilly and most of fox news would be fired🙂

 

[OutHouse]

wow there are a lot of NPR left wing liberal save the world, everybody is equal, waldorf tree hugging graduates in here.

O'reilly was unfailry attacked and even NPR admits it, get over it.

 

[mugs]

Originally posted by: PainTrain

Originally posted by: Lucky
and npr does not have to worry about the commercial viability of their programs when they produce them. fox does. awards don't mean jack crap when one of the entities competing for them is publically subsidized.

that's not even touching the fact that fox's purpose does not include the sorts of programs NPR produces.

Journalistic integrity goes right out the damn window when money is on the line then I guess.

That is in fact the issue Franken addresses in the first chapter of his book. I listened to the interview, and I'm not sure why O'Reilly was so mad, other than that he didn't get to plug his book. All the interviewer was asking him to do was defend himself against the claims Franken made in his book. As I'm sure O'Reilly has read the chapters in the book that are about him, it shouldn't be too hard for him to defend himself - unless what Franken wrote was true. If what Franken wrote was true, that would make O'Reilly a liar - considering how O'Reilly treats people who he judges to be lying, I think I'd like O'Reilly to set the record straight about his own honesty.

O'reilly was unfailry attacked and even NPR admits it, get over it.

Read it again.