One student poops in another students soda

[tcsenter]

As for the comeback, you obviously suck at pranks if you think it has to be in the same vein. Oh, and if you think permanent maiming, arson, severe property destruction and attempted murder and/or manslaughter are the "only proper take it to the next level" pranks, you should probably be on meds.

Dude, the kid put excrement in his soda and he put it in his mouth.

Now, maybe in your little circle of the world, having the excrement of another person - in this particular case another man - in your mouth is par for the course or maybe even heightens your happy ending. You sound like someone who probably likes a teabag now and then while you're getting a little shit on your lips.

But for people who don't take joy in anal rimming other men (i.e. don't feel that defecating in another person's mouth is something they might like to have done to them), its about as offensive, personal, and outrageous as it gets.

As for the class, maybe none of them really knew each other and enough didn't give a shit (pun intended) that the bystander effect occurred. Step out of your paranoia please.

Doesn't wash. If none of them knew each other, all the more likely someone would not have had any allegiance to or fear of the perpetrators in the prank and would have stepped-up to warn this kid.

 

[tcsenter]

I've seen pranks cross the line a dozen times. And the one who is first to take a prank across the line or doesn't know when to stop is ALWAYS the one who has some upper-hand or advantage in a power circle/social dynamic. e.g.

- is friends with or related to the boss or management (if it happens in a workplace)
- has friends who are borderline sociopaths like him and will do his bidding (if it happens in a school or other social context)

The reason they take the prank too far is NOT because they don't understand where the line is or what constitutes an inappropriate or over-the-top prank. The reasons they take the prank too far are ALWAYS because:

- they are borderline sociopaths/psychopaths who don't give a fuck
- they have some upper-hand or advantage in the situation, and thus don't fear retaliation or consequences
- they KNOW the other person won't fight back or escalate

i.e. it is a form of bullying

 

[irishScott]

Dude, the kid put excrement in his soda and he put it in his mouth.

Now, maybe in your little circle of the world, having the excrement of another person - in this particular case another man - in your mouth is par for the course or maybe even heightens your happy ending. You sound like someone who probably likes a teabag now and then while you're getting a little shit on your lips.

But for people who don't take joy in anal rimming other men (i.e. don't feel that defecating in another person's mouth is something they might like to have done to them), its about as offensive, personal, and outrageous as it gets.


Doesn't wash. If none of them knew each other, all the more likely someone would not have had any allegiance to or fear of the perpetrators in the prank and would have stepped-up to warn this kid.

I disagree with your overreactions, therefore I am into gay scat? And they are overreactions. FYI most of your "taking it to the next level" "pranks" from your previous posts would allow me to legally kill you in self defense. So if I shat in your soda, you, yes you, would escalate it to the point where I could kill you with no legal ramifications. If that isn't an overreaction I don't know what is.

It was an unfunny, douchebag move of a prank. I wouldn't have enjoyed it or laughed about it, but I'd hardly have sued him over it. And like I said even if it was bullying, all that kid did was decrease his social status even further. He'll be looked at as even more of a wimp and will be outcast on the basis of "don't mess with him, he'll sue".

And what retribution from the perpetrator(s)? Does a chop-shop gang run part of their cartel out of the shop class? Even if it was a factor, all the kid did was line himself up for more "retribution". Community service isn't making your supposed "bully" cease contact with the victim.

 

[n7]

beyond disgusting.

 

[irishScott]

I've seen pranks cross the line a dozen times. And the one who is first to take a prank across the line or doesn't know when to stop is ALWAYS the one who has some upper-hand or advantage in a power circle/social dynamic. e.g.

- is friends with or related to the boss or management (if it happens in a workplace)
- has friends who are borderline sociopaths like him and will do his bidding (if it happens in a school or other social context)

The reason they take the prank too far is NOT because they don't understand where the line is or what constitutes an inappropriate or over-the-top prank. The reasons they take the prank too far are ALWAYS because:

- they are borderline sociopaths/psychopaths who don't give a fuck
- they have some upper-hand or advantage in the situation, and thus don't fear retaliation or consequences
- they KNOW the other person won't fight back or escalate

i.e. it is a form of bullying

With your definitions of "the line" I'd be afraid to fart in the stall next to you without my forthcoming CCW. After all, inhaling minute particles of my shit is akin to my strapping you into a chair and shoving my stools up your nose.

 

[tcsenter]

I disagree with your overreactions, therefore I am into scat? And they are overreactions.

What "over" reaction? Again, dude put SHIT in his drink and he put it in his mouth. Evidently, the thought of having someone else's shit in your mouth just doesn't seem to register all that negatively with you. Care to tell us why that is?

With your definitions of "the line" I'd be afraid to fart in the stall next to you without my forthcoming CCW. After all, inhaling minute particles of my shit is akin to my strapping you into a chair and shoving my stools up your nose

Epic analogy fail. More evidence that the thought of having excrement in your mouth does not provoke all that negative of a reaction for you, to the point where it doesn't register any differently for you than something as innocuous or common as someone farting near you. Again, is there anything you care to tell us about that would explain your inappropriately ho-hum reaction to the idea of having excrement in your mouth as though it were akin to something more commonplace like someone farting a few feet away?

 

[KeithP]

...then spit it out as his classmates laughed on March 29.

Not only do I think the perp got off easy, I would have added 50 hours of community service to every classmate that watched and let it happen.

-KeithP

 

[geno]

Is it me or does this soda taste a bit nutty?

 

[irishScott]

What "over" reaction? Again, dude put SHIT in his drink and he put it in his mouth. Evidently, the thought of having someone else's shit in your mouth just doesn't seem to register all that negatively with you. Care to tell us why that is?


Epic analogy fail. More evidence that the thought of having excrement in your mouth does not provoke all that negative of a reaction for you, to the point where it doesn't register any differently for you than something as innocuous or common as someone farting near you. Again, is there anything you care to tell us about that would explain your inappropriately ho-hum reaction to the idea of having excrement in your mouth as though it were akin to something more commonplace like someone farting a few feet away?

Lol. The article specifically states he took a "sip" (since your definition of "prank" is so off I'll clarify that a "sip" is a minute quantity of liquid able to be ingested through a small opening in the lips). He promptly either saw or tasted the shit and spit it out. It's not like guy shoved his stool down his throat.

And my reaction would be quite negative, and hardly ho-hum. As I previously said I'd splash his own shit in his face and force him to either pay for a new drink or lose face in front of his peers.

You would set his house on fire. To clarify: You would escalate to pre-meditated murder and lethal force over getting a few minute particles of shit in your mouth for less than a second, off a stupid harmless prank. You see the "over" in your "reaction"?

Oh and btw, this irishScott-loves-gay-scat conspiracy theory you're concocting reeks of projection.

 

[Cogman]

Gross. I hope the perp doesn't get this put on his permanent criminal record, that would be sad. However, I support the community service and the research paper of feces. You can get some pretty nasty illnesses from human excrement.

Heck, I would order community service for just about any minor infraction. Its productive to society, and can teach the kids a valuable lesson in respect.

 

[Modular]

Disgusting. That kid deserved way worse than 200 hours, etc. He should have been forced to drink his own shit and gargle piss. But we're pussies here in the States and are afraid of an eye for an eye.

 

[InflatableBuddha]

You need to cool down. Here, I've got a soda for you. :sneaky:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QylncpJy5Rc

 

[tcsenter]

And my reaction would be quite negative, and hardly ho-hum. As I previously said I'd splash his own shit in his face and force him to either pay for a new drink or lose face in front of his peers.

Orly? Do tell us how you would set about to accomplish such a thing. Here, I'll even help you by playing the other dude:

First, I duck your lame attempt to splash the soda in my face (because I could see that one coming a mile away). Don't get a drop on me, but everyone laughs again...at you because you missed.

Second, I say "No, sorry" when you demand that I buy you a new drink and walk away laughing. Again, everyone laughs...at you because not only is this a completely lame response (as though the expense of having to compensate you for a new soda is really equal to getting shit in your mouth) but I won't even give you the satisfaction of having your lame compensation.

OK, that worked great, Genius. Tell us, what's next?

 

[Itchrelief]

Orly? Do tell us how you would set about to accomplish such a thing. Here, I'll even help you by playing the other dude:

First, I duck your lame attempt to splash the soda in my face (because I could see that one coming a mile away). Don't get a drop on me, but everyone laughs again...at you because you missed.

Second, I say "No, sorry" when you demand that I buy you a new drink and walk away laughing. Again, everyone laughs...at you because not only is this a completely lame response (as though the expense of having to compensate you for a new soda is really equal to getting shit in your mouth) but I won't even give you the satisfaction of having your lame compensation.

OK, that worked great, Genius. Tell us, what's next?

he obviously fancies himself the prank master and thinks he'll be able to one-up anyone, but I seriously doubt that the world of Parker Lewis applies to real life. I'd like to see him feel so calm and smug in his abilities after he drinks someone else's shit. I wouldn't take anything he says seriously until he chugs that crap down.

 

[irishScott]

Orly? Do tell us how you would set about to accomplish such a thing. Here, I'll even help you by playing the other dude:

First, I duck your lame attempt to splash the soda in my face (because I could see that one coming a mile away). Don't get a drop on me, but everyone laughs again...at you because you missed.

Second, I say "No, sorry" when you demand that I buy you a new drink and walk away laughing. Again, everyone laughs...at you because not only is this a completely lame response (as though the expense of having to compensate you for a new soda is really equal to getting shit in your mouth) but I won't even give you the satisfaction of having your lame compensation.

OK, that worked great, Genius. Tell us, what's next?

The fact that you're refusing to acknowledge your promotion of murder, maiming and arson in response to a stupid prank; and have now resorted to armchairing, says it all. We could armchair and counter-armchair scenarios that would work and fail all night, but I have no desire for a Navy Seal vs MMA Fighter: Shit-Prank Edition thread.

What's next? Nothing else needs to be said. You shamelessly and quite literally promote arson, maiming, pre-meditated murder and other forms of lethal or potentially lethal force as a response to a stupid prank that wouldn't endanger the immune system of a 2 year old.

Oh and itchrelief: No one "chugged" anything. He took a "sip", and spat it out. "Sip". Direct quote from the very short blurb in the OP's link. Read the OP before attempting to double-troll. Kthxbye.

 

[tcsenter]

What's next? Nothing else needs to be said.

Oh wow, you really showed him! That was da bomb, man. That dude ain't never gonna mess with you like that again. You really reclaimed your dignity there:

"I would like you to buy me another soda, please."

"No."

Mad props to the Punked Master! None of those people in your class will be laughing at you, anymore!

You shamelessly and quite literally promote arson, maiming, pre-meditated murder and other forms of lethal or potentially lethal force as a response to a stupid prank that wouldn't endanger the immune system of a 2 year old.

Wrong. People get hepatitis from diapers in landfills that contaminate water and food, you idiot. There are a number of diseases or illnesses that could and are contracted from oral-fecal contact.

Even if his feces was certified "clean", it doesn't matter. This kind of "I'm going to put my bodily fluids in your mouth whether you like it or not" is exactly the same type of treatment that sexual predators and other psychopaths/sociopaths use to dominate/humiliate/traumatize their victims. Its essentially forced anal or oral sodomy by proxy.

The fact that you're refusing to acknowledge your promotion of murder, maiming and arson in response to a stupid prank; and have now resorted to armchairing, says it all.

So what? It completely meets the definition of "prank" that you established:

"A practical joke (also known as a prank or gag) is a mischievous trick played on a person, especially one that causes the victim to experience embarrassment, indignity, or discomfort."

Having your knee caps broken or your dogs poisoned certain causes "embarrassment, indignity, or discomfort", does it not?

As long as the prankster finds it funny, that's all that really matters. Doesn't matter if the one being pranked finds it funny. Again, according to you. I think it would be HILARIOUS if someone broke this kid's knee caps or the brakes were to fail on his car. LAUGH LAUGH LAUGH.

If you will recall, I approved of calling the police on these jerks and filing a criminal complaint, then suing the shit out of them, precisely because this kind of "prank" is so deeply fucking offensive that violence or even more outrageous escalating pranks are most likely to result from it. There aren't too many places to take a 'tit-for-tat' game of practical jokes after someone puts feces in your food or drink, other than rapid escalation.

YOU were the one opposed to the legal route and supported settling this game by escalating it, not me. And your idea of a 'response'? "I want you to buy me another drink!" Wow, that really showed him.

 

[Mr. Lennon]

:hmm:This doesn't surprise me.

LOL not one bit. Witnessed a kid getting tea bagged in my autoshop class.

 

[irishScott]

Oh wow, you really showed him! That was da bomb, man. That dude ain't never gonna mess with you like that again. You really reclaimed your dignity there:

"I would like you to buy me another soda, please."

"No."

Mad props to the Punked Master! None of those people in your class will be laughing at you, anymore!

Wrong. People get hepatitis from diapers in landfills that contaminate water and food, you idiot. There are a number of diseases or illnesses that could and are contracted from oral-fecal contact.

Even if his feces was certified "clean", it doesn't matter. This kind of "I'm going to put my bodily fluids in your mouth whether you like it or not" is exactly the same type of treatment that sexual predators and other psychopaths/sociopaths use to dominate/humiliate/traumatize their victims. Its essentially forced anal or oral sodomy by proxy.


So what? It completely meets the definition of "prank" that you established:

"A practical joke (also known as a prank or gag) is a mischievous trick played on a person, especially one that causes the victim to experience embarrassment, indignity, or discomfort."

Having your knee caps broken or your dogs poisoned certain causes "embarrassment, indignity, or discomfort", does it not?

As long as the prankster finds it funny, that's all that really matters. Doesn't matter if the one being pranked finds it funny. Again, according to you. I think it would be HILARIOUS if someone broke this kid's knee caps or the brakes were to fail on his car. LAUGH LAUGH LAUGH.

If you will recall, I approved of calling the police on these jerks and filing a criminal complaint, then suing the shit out of them, precisely because this kind of "prank" is so deeply fucking offensive that violence or even more outrageous escalating pranks are most likely to result from it. There aren't too many places to take a 'tit-for-tat' game of practical jokes after someone puts feces in your food or drink, other than rapid escalation.

YOU were the one opposed to the legal route and supported settling this game by escalating it, not me. And your idea of a 'response'? "I want you to buy me another drink!" Wow, that really showed him.

You're trolling your ass off, are off your meds or are batshit crazy. Or all three. If I someday shit in your soda, rest assured you will most likely be oh-so-legally and morally shot whilst seeking revenge. Have a nice life.

 

[ahenkel]

I hope he remembered to wash his hands after.