One for the Obama haters

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
I generally think highly of Chris Hedges' commentary. I've recommended his book 'War is a Force That Gives Us Meaning' a number of times.

With Obama, there are gray areas - and some not so gray but rather wrong.

He has a huge mess on his hands, and deserves a lot of slack to work through it.

But there are repeated incidents in his past that raise red flags regarding his voting for corporatism while spinning it.

His economic team in particular is a problem.

I have looked at his comments, and found much to like, and given him credit for that, even while cotinuing concern.

Hedges' in the following commentary has concluded that many of the worst suspicions about Obama are correct, and lays out the price.

I think it's worth considering Hedges' points and I can just say I hope he's wrong, and he problably hopes the same thing.

On the other hand, our nation inexplicably voted about 47% for McCain/Palin, and Obama may be doing what our crazy nation needs.

Much remains to be seen in what Obama chooses.

Hedges does get a bonus point for the reference to Walter Lippman's "Public Opinion", a book everyone can benefit from.

Here is the article.

Unfortunately, I've reached the same conclusion Hedges states about the impact *if* Obama falls short, that it opens the door to demagogues.

The junk politics practiced by Obama is a consumer fraud. It is about performance. It is about lies. It is about keeping us in a perpetual state of childishness. But the longer we live in illusion, the worse reality will be when it finally shatters our fantasies. Those who do not understand what is happening around them and who are overwhelmed by a brutal reality they did not expect or foresee search desperately for saviors. They beg demagogues to come to their rescue. This is the ultimate danger of the Obama Brand. It effectively masks the wanton internal destruction and theft being carried out by our corporate state. These corporations, once they have stolen trillions in taxpayer wealth, will leave tens of millions of Americans bereft, bewildered and yearning for even more potent and deadly illusions, ones that could swiftly snuff out what is left of our diminished open society.
 

cubeless

Diamond Member
Sep 17, 2001
4,295
1
81
waaaaa!!! take a step back and who is the savior that was being looked for? and it's evil "demagogues" who are pointing out that his walk and talk are drastically divergent?

sounds like buyer's remorse to me... 'the savior is dead! long live the savior!'...

the good news is that y'all can try again in a couple years... maybe kerrry will run for ya... or hillary... they'll do it differently...
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Hedges is a Traitor.

He should bow down to his Overlords with corporate power and the vast military-industrial complex.

It's the American Way. Power to the Corporation!

I'd like to think Obama could be an agent of change in this 'neo-fascism' of corporate largess and the public assumption of private losses, but the globalization genie is out of the bottle and breaking the World is not an option.

So in some eyes Obama is a Commie Socialist. At best we may only hope to briefly stem the tide ...
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Leftists waking up to the cult of Obama? Say it ain't so...joe...

But really that's the only part of that piece that I think hits at the truth. The rest is just your typical far leftist fringe agenda. Yes we know BHO isn't EXTREME left(on the face of his cult) but that doesn't mean he isn't far left. He would push a lot of those things the author whined about if he didn't have to run for re-election and/or if he didn't need to keep the majorities he now enjoys. Most of the policies talked about would be soundly rejected by normal Americans - which is why BHO's cult has not yet tried most of them and why should he, he already has control of the banking and auto industries in his first 100 days - what more can leftists realistically ask for?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
At some point it's not about left or right but about authoritarianism. As government gets bigger and bigger, left and right become indistinguishable because the goal of both is power and control.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Craig I must say you have posted a couple of threads that show your willingness to open your eyes. :thumbsup:

If Obama continues down this road I have faith your eyes will open before mine did on what Bush was doing. It really took me until the summer of 06 to go, wtf have I been supporting this guy and his policies? He doesnt represent free market capitalism but more govt control and a quasi fascism. Obama looks to be taking these policies and injecting them with steroids right now.

One thing Obama has done imo is turn our political preconceptions on its ear. The far right calls him a socialist while he conducts a fascist agenda. The far left is still under some assumption he is going to take it to the big corps when so far he has funneled hundreds of billions into them and the rich who run them. He still conducts the wot when he is supposed to be a pussy lefty. And the guy make Bill Clinton look dry when it comes to political genius.

I am still on the fence with him. I didnt have any high expectations of him and so far he hasnt impressed nor disappointed. Well I guess his expansion of govt disappoints but wasnt unexpected considering the makeup of the congress. In the 100 day grade thread he was in the C- to D+ range with my four topics of economic, domestic, foreign, and WoT.



 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: BoberFett
At some point it's not about left or right but about authoritarianism. As government gets bigger and bigger, left and right become indistinguishable because the goal of both is power and control.

Exactly. I have been looking at these people as big vs small govt for awhile now, not left vs right. Even worse for me since there are almost no small govt politicians left.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,669
6,728
126
The author is an idiot. He imagines there are a group of dangerous psychopaths out there whose worship of a demagogue represents some threat to the nation that can only grow more dangerous with time and Obama failure. It is about they and them and the other, not the author himself who is demagogue free and enlightened. He, himself, is our real savior come to save us from saviors, our faithful cackling of geese that will save our Roman nation.

He is an idiot because he does not see that what he critiques is himself, not some other. The problem he diagnoses is in every one of us. He who hates himself and that is all of us always looks for a savior. What worthless person trusts that he can save himself.

No, instead of hating the other because he or she is weak and reliant, seeking to return to the mother's breast, know that all your hidden self hate that you don't know is there and will not face, is a total lie. There is only love and there was never ever anything wrong with you. There is only one war and it begins and ends in you. It is the true Jihad, the war against the illusory ego that denies what you really feel.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
It effectively masks the wanton internal destruction and theft being carried out by our corporate state. These corporations, once they have stolen trillions in taxpayer wealth,
How exactly do these corporations 'steal' tax payers wealth???

The only way a corporation can get money is from either getting people to willingly buy goods for them or from getting the government to GIVE them money.

And where does the government get that money?? They take it from tax payers.

Therefore, the only way corporations can 'steal' tax payers wealth is if the government takes that wealth from the tax payers and gives it to the corporation.

So it seems that the solution to this problem is smaller government.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Leftists waking up to the cult of Obama? Say it ain't so...joe...

But really that's the only part of that piece that I think hits at the truth. The rest is just your typical far leftist fringe agenda. Yes we know BHO isn't EXTREME left(on the face of his cult) but that doesn't mean he isn't far left. He would push a lot of those things the author whined about if he didn't have to run for re-election and/or if he didn't need to keep the majorities he now enjoys. Most of the policies talked about would be soundly rejected by normal Americans - which is why BHO's cult has not yet tried most of them and why should he, he already has control of the banking and auto industries in his first 100 days - what more can leftists realistically ask for?

WTF? Are you trying to promote/justify your sig or something? You righties need to stop with the cult and messiah crap. Last I checked it was your side that's filled with fundies.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Leftists waking up to the cult of Obama? Say it ain't so...joe...

But really that's the only part of that piece that I think hits at the truth. The rest is just your typical far leftist fringe agenda. Yes we know BHO isn't EXTREME left(on the face of his cult) but that doesn't mean he isn't far left. He would push a lot of those things the author whined about if he didn't have to run for re-election and/or if he didn't need to keep the majorities he now enjoys. Most of the policies talked about would be soundly rejected by normal Americans - which is why BHO's cult has not yet tried most of them and why should he, he already has control of the banking and auto industries in his first 100 days - what more can leftists realistically ask for?

WTF? Are you trying to promote/justify your sig or something? You righties need to stop with the cult and messiah crap. Last I checked it was your side that's filled with fundies.

Both sides have their share of 'fundies' - it's just that the gods are different. On the left, that god is government.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Leftists waking up to the cult of Obama? Say it ain't so...joe...

But really that's the only part of that piece that I think hits at the truth. The rest is just your typical far leftist fringe agenda. Yes we know BHO isn't EXTREME left(on the face of his cult) but that doesn't mean he isn't far left. He would push a lot of those things the author whined about if he didn't have to run for re-election and/or if he didn't need to keep the majorities he now enjoys. Most of the policies talked about would be soundly rejected by normal Americans - which is why BHO's cult has not yet tried most of them and why should he, he already has control of the banking and auto industries in his first 100 days - what more can leftists realistically ask for?

WTF? Are you trying to promote/justify your sig or something? You righties need to stop with the cult and messiah crap. Last I checked it was your side that's filled with fundies.

No, actually I read the article. If you had, you'd know why I posted what I did about the Obama cult.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Leftists waking up to the cult of Obama? Say it ain't so...joe...

But really that's the only part of that piece that I think hits at the truth. The rest is just your typical far leftist fringe agenda. Yes we know BHO isn't EXTREME left(on the face of his cult) but that doesn't mean he isn't far left. He would push a lot of those things the author whined about if he didn't have to run for re-election and/or if he didn't need to keep the majorities he now enjoys. Most of the policies talked about would be soundly rejected by normal Americans - which is why BHO's cult has not yet tried most of them and why should he, he already has control of the banking and auto industries in his first 100 days - what more can leftists realistically ask for?

WTF? Are you trying to promote/justify your sig or something? You righties need to stop with the cult and messiah crap. Last I checked it was your side that's filled with fundies.

Both sides have their share of 'fundies' - it's just that the gods are different. On the left, that god is government.

Apparently you and I have different definitions of what a 'god' is.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Leftists waking up to the cult of Obama? Say it ain't so...joe...

But really that's the only part of that piece that I think hits at the truth. The rest is just your typical far leftist fringe agenda. Yes we know BHO isn't EXTREME left(on the face of his cult) but that doesn't mean he isn't far left. He would push a lot of those things the author whined about if he didn't have to run for re-election and/or if he didn't need to keep the majorities he now enjoys. Most of the policies talked about would be soundly rejected by normal Americans - which is why BHO's cult has not yet tried most of them and why should he, he already has control of the banking and auto industries in his first 100 days - what more can leftists realistically ask for?

WTF? Are you trying to promote/justify your sig or something? You righties need to stop with the cult and messiah crap. Last I checked it was your side that's filled with fundies.

No, actually I read the article. If you had, you'd know why I posted what I did about the Obama cult.

tl;dr and don't really care about 1 guys slant piece against Obama anyway. It doesn't justify the constant crap from Obama bashers like your sig and the messiah label. Hate to tell you but nearly everyone realizes Obama is just 1 guy, he's not perfect, and he's not going to please everyone - including his supporters.
 

cubeless

Diamond Member
Sep 17, 2001
4,295
1
81
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
The author is an idiot. He imagines there are a group of dangerous psychopaths out there whose worship of a demagogue represents some threat to the nation that can only grow more dangerous with time and Obama failure. It is about they and them and the other, not the author himself who is demagogue free and enlightened. He, himself, is our real savior come to save us from saviors, our faithful cackling of geese that will save our Roman nation.

He is an idiot because he does not see that what he critiques is himself, not some other. The problem he diagnoses is in every one of us. He who hates himself and that is all of us always looks for a savior. What worthless person trusts that he can save himself.

No, instead of hating the other because he or she is weak and reliant, seeking to return to the mother's breast, know that all your hidden self hate that you don't know is there and will not face, is a total lie. There is only love and there was never ever anything wrong with you. There is only one war and it begins and ends in you. It is the true Jihad, the war against the illusory ego that denies what you really feel.

yeee ha!!! i knew you wouldn't use the time off you got to get your meds updated... do you have an ekhard tolle tatoo on your neck maybe?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
The author is an idiot.

You should read the book I mentioned, 'War is a Force That Gives Us Meaning', before saying this, and I suspect it would lead you to retract the statement.

You might not change a word of your negative opinion about this article by him, but your comments should be about this article, not saying he's an idiot.

I'd think you would appreciate, not criticize, his points such as these on the eve of Iraq:

But the war on terrorism is different in that we Americans find ourselves in the dangerous position of going to war not against a state but a phantom. The crusade we have embarked upon in the war on terrorism is targeting an elusive and protean enemy. The battle we have begun is never-ending. But it may be too late to wind back the heady rhetoric. We have embarked on a campaign as quixotic as the one mounted to destroy us. As it continues, as terrorist attacks intrude on our lives, as we feel less and less secure, the acceptance of all methods to lash out at real and perceived enemies will distort and deform our democracy.

And yet, the campaign's attraction seems irresistible. War makes the world understandable, a black-and-white tableau of them and us. It suspends thought, especially self-critical thought. All bow before the supreme effort. We are one. Most of us willingly accept war as long as we can fold it into a belief system that paints the ensuing suffering as necessary for a higher good; for human beings seek not only happiness but also meaning. And tragically, war is sometimes the most powerful way in human society to achieve meaning.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,669
6,728
126
Originally posted by: cubeless
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
The author is an idiot. He imagines there are a group of dangerous psychopaths out there whose worship of a demagogue represents some threat to the nation that can only grow more dangerous with time and Obama failure. It is about they and them and the other, not the author himself who is demagogue free and enlightened. He, himself, is our real savior come to save us from saviors, our faithful cackling of geese that will save our Roman nation.

He is an idiot because he does not see that what he critiques is himself, not some other. The problem he diagnoses is in every one of us. He who hates himself and that is all of us always looks for a savior. What worthless person trusts that he can save himself.

No, instead of hating the other because he or she is weak and reliant, seeking to return to the mother's breast, know that all your hidden self hate that you don't know is there and will not face, is a total lie. There is only love and there was never ever anything wrong with you. There is only one war and it begins and ends in you. It is the true Jihad, the war against the illusory ego that denies what you really feel.

yeee ha!!! i knew you wouldn't use the time off you got to get your meds updated... do you have an ekhard tolle tatoo on your neck maybe?

I made it clear in my post that I already knew you feel worthless and unforgiven. There nothing to be had by posting comments that only reaffirm how your feelings of worthlessness make you act childish and naive.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,669
6,728
126
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
The author is an idiot.

You should read the book I mentioned, 'War is a Force That Gives Us Meaning', before saying this, and I suspect it would lead you to retract the statement.

You might not change a word of your negative opinion about this article by him, but your comments should be about this article, not saying he's an idiot.

I'd think you would appreciate, not criticize, his points such as these on the eve of Iraq:

But the war on terrorism is different in that we Americans find ourselves in the dangerous position of going to war not against a state but a phantom. The crusade we have embarked upon in the war on terrorism is targeting an elusive and protean enemy. The battle we have begun is never-ending. But it may be too late to wind back the heady rhetoric. We have embarked on a campaign as quixotic as the one mounted to destroy us. As it continues, as terrorist attacks intrude on our lives, as we feel less and less secure, the acceptance of all methods to lash out at real and perceived enemies will distort and deform our democracy.

And yet, the campaign's attraction seems irresistible. War makes the world understandable, a black-and-white tableau of them and us. It suspends thought, especially self-critical thought. All bow before the supreme effort. We are one. Most of us willingly accept war as long as we can fold it into a belief system that paints the ensuing suffering as necessary for a higher good; for human beings seek not only happiness but also meaning. And tragically, war is sometimes the most powerful way in human society to achieve meaning.

Again, Craig, he sees the problem out there. It is out there only by virtue of the fact that we are all the same. But he is only asking that we see a single facet of a multi faceted human psychosis that has its multiple symptoms in a single cause, self hate. And as long as humanity focuses elsewhere, on the symptoms if it's disease in their external expression, we will continue to be pegged to the endless spin of the wheel of Karma.

There is only one war. There is only one enemy. There is nothing at all to do but to awaken. All you can do to fix the world is to see there is nothing wrong with it because there is nothing wrong with you. Everything else is a complete and total delusion, a running away from what we really feel, our own terrible self hate.

So there it is, the deepest truth you will ever hear, and is it not completely useless? I can read any book but it won't change a thing. My job is to feel what I really feel. How can I do that?
 

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
Chris Hedges does not approve of the bailouts. But he does not address what would have happened to the economy if the Federal government had done nothing in response to the economic crisis the US is experiencing. Nor does he recommend actions for dealing with the deep US global recession.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Siddhartha
Chris Hedges does not approve of the bailouts. But he does not address what would have happened to the economy if the Federal government had done nothing in response to the economic crisis the US is experiencing. Nor does he recommend actions for dealing with the deep US global recession.

He correctly points to more fundamental changes needed - and how the misdirected resources are a symptom of those larger problems.

The changes he suggests would result in the resources being directed to other things. As he said, "We could have saved tens of millions of Americans from poverty. The government could have, as consumer activist Ralph Nader has pointed out, started 10 new banks with $35 billion each and a 10-to-1 leverage to open credit markets. " He points to David Korten's "Agenda for a New Economy" for a plan.

The fact that he made the points in this article about the errors of the Obama approach rather than the ones you mention, doesn't make him wrong abut the points he made.

He has other columns worth looking at of course; here's one from April:

America is devolving into a third-world nation. And if we do not immediately halt our elite's rapacious looting of the public treasury we will be left with trillions in debts, which can never be repaid, and widespread human misery which we will be helpless to ameliorate. Our anemic democracy will be replaced with a robust national police state. The elite will withdraw into heavily guarded gated communities where they will have access to security, goods and services that cannot be afforded by the rest of us. Tens of millions of people, brutally controlled, will live in perpetual poverty. This is the inevitable result of unchecked corporate capitalism. The stimulus and bailout plans are not about saving us. They are about saving them. We can resist, which means street protests, disruptions of the system and demonstrations, or become serfs.

We have been in a steady economic decline for decades. The Canadian political philosopher John Ralston Saul detailed this decline in his 1992 book "Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West." David Cay Johnston exposed the mirage and rot of American capitalism in "Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (and Stick You With the Bill)," and David C. Korten, in "When Corporations Rule the World" and "Agenda for a New Economy," laid out corporate malfeasance and abuse. But our universities and mass media, entranced by power and naively believing that global capitalism was an unstoppable force of nature, rarely asked the right questions or gave a prominent voice to those who did. Our elites hid their incompetence and loss of control behind an arrogant facade of specialized jargon and obscure economic theories.

The lies employed to camouflage the economic decline are legion. President Ronald Reagan included 1.5 million U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine service personnel with the civilian work force to magically reduce the nation's unemployment rate by 2 percent. President Bill Clinton decided that those who had given up looking for work, or those who wanted full-time jobs but could only find part-time employment, were no longer to be counted as unemployed. This trick disappeared some 5 million unemployed from the official unemployment rolls. If you work more than 21 hours a week-most low-wage workers at places like Wal-Mart average 28 hours a week-you are counted as employed, although your real wages put you below the poverty line. Our actual unemployment rate, when you include those who have stopped looking for work and those who can only find part-time jobs, is not 8.5 percent but 15 percent. A sixth of the country is now effectively unemployed. And we are shedding jobs at a faster rate than in the months after the 1929 crash.

The consumer price index, used by the government to measure inflation, is meaningless. To keep the official inflation figures low the government has been substituting basic products it once measured to check for inflation with ones that do not rise very much in price. This sleight of hand has kept the cost-of-living increases tied to the CPI artificially low. The New York Times' consumer reporter, W.P. Dunleavy, wrote that her groceries now cost $587 a month, up from $400 a year earlier. This is a 40 percent increase. California economist John Williams, who runs an organization called Shadow Statistics, contends that if Washington still used the CPI measurements applied back in the 1970s, inflation would be 10 percent.

The corporate state, and the political and intellectual class that served the corporate state, constructed a financial and political system based on illusions. Corporations engaged in pyramid lending that created fictitious assets. These fictitious assets became collateral for more bank lending. The elite skimmed off hundreds of millions in bonuses, commissions and salaries from this fictitious wealth. Politicians, who dutifully served corporate interests rather than those of citizens, were showered with campaign contributions and given lucrative jobs when they left office. Universities, knowing it was not good business to challenge corporatism, muted any voices of conscience while they went begging for corporate donations and grants. Deceptive loans and credit card debt fueled the binges of a consumer society and hid falling wages and the loss of manufacturing jobs.

The Obama administration, rather than chart a new course, is intent on re-inflating the bubble. The trillions of dollars of government funds being spent to sustain these corrupt corporations could have renovated our economy. We could have saved tens of millions of Americans from poverty. The government could have, as consumer activist Ralph Nader has pointed out, started 10 new banks with $35 billion each and a 10-to-1 leverage to open credit markets. Vast, unimaginable sums are being placed into these dirty corporate hands without oversight. And they will use this money as they always have-to enrich themselves at our expense.

"You are going to see the biggest waste, fraud and abuse in American history," Nader warned when I asked about the bailouts. "Not only is it wrongly directed, not only does it deal with the perpetrators instead of the people who were victimized, but they don't have a delivery system of any honesty and efficiency. The Justice Department is overwhelmed. It doesn't have a tenth of the prosecutors, the investigators, the auditors, the attorneys needed to deal with the previous corporate crime wave before the bailout started last September. It is especially unable to deal with the rapacious ravaging of this new money by these corporate recipients. You can see it already. The corporations haven't lent it. They have used some of it for acquisitions or to preserve their bonuses or their dividends. As long as they know they are not going to jail, and they don't see many newspaper reports about their colleagues going to jail, they don't care. It is total impunity. If they quit, they quit with a golden parachute. Even [General Motors CEO Rick] Wagoner is taking away $21 million."

There are a handful of former executives who have conceded that the bailouts are a waste. American International Group Inc.?s (AIG) former chairman, Maurice R. Greenberg, told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Thursday that the effort to prop up the firm with $170 billion has "failed." He said the company should be restructured. AIG, he said, would have been better off filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection instead of seeking government help.

"These are signs of hyper decay," Nader said from his office in Washington. "You spend this kind of money and do not know if it will work."

"Bankrupt corporate capitalism is on its way to bankrupting the socialism that is trying to save it," Nader added. "That is the end stage. If they no longer have socialism to save them then we are into feudalism. We are into private police, gated communities and serfs with a 21st century nomenclature."

We will not be able to raise another 3 or 4 trillion dollars, especially with our commitments now totaling some $12 trillion, to fix the mess. It was only a couple of months ago that our expenditures totaled $9 trillion. And it was not long ago that such profligate government spending was unthinkable. There was an $800 billion limit placed on the Federal Reserve a year ago. The economic stimulus and the bailouts will not bring back our casino capitalism. And as the meltdown shows no signs of abating, and the bailouts show no sign of working, the recklessness and desperation of our capitalist overlords have increased. The cost, to the working and middle class, is becoming unsustainable. The Fed reported in March that households lost $5.1 trillion, or 9 percent, of their wealth in the last three months of 2008, the most ever in a single quarter in the 57-year history of record keeping by the central bank. For the full year, household wealth dropped $11.1 trillion, or about 18 percent. These figures did not record the decline of investments in the stock market, which has probably erased trillions more in the country's collective net worth.

The bullet to our head, inevitable if we do not radically alter course, will be sudden. We have been borrowing at the rate of more than $2 billion a day over the last 10 years, and at some point it has to stop. The moment China, the oil-rich states and other international investors stop buying treasury bonds the dollar will become junk. Inflation will rocket upward. We will become Weimar Germany. A furious and sustained backlash by a betrayed and angry populace, one unprepared intellectually and psychologically for collapse, will sweep aside the Democrats and most of the Republicans. A cabal of proto-fascist misfits, from Christian demagogues to simpletons like Sarah Palin to loudmouth talk show hosts, who we naively dismiss as buffoons, will find a following with promises of revenge and moral renewal. The elites, the ones with their Harvard Business School degrees and expensive vocabularies, will retreat into their sheltered enclaves of privilege and comfort. We will be left bereft and abandoned outside the gates.