• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

One dead, one injured in Miami Burger King shooting

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: Poulsonator
You are correct in that there's a difference. The robber wasn't pointing his gun at Wild Bill, though. In fact, we don't even know if the robber was pointing his gun at anybody as the article said the gun was only 'shown'. This wasn't justifiable homicide.

Care to explain why he wasn't arrested, then?

Look at it another way. What if a bystander was shot or killed. The CC guy would be looking at a trial.

Of course whats your point?

That the guy was extremely lucky. That is why he wasn't arrested.

He wasn't arrested because he was lucky. He wasn't arrested because he didn't commit a crime.
 
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: Poulsonator
You are correct in that there's a difference. The robber wasn't pointing his gun at Wild Bill, though. In fact, we don't even know if the robber was pointing his gun at anybody as the article said the gun was only 'shown'. This wasn't justifiable homicide.

Care to explain why he wasn't arrested, then?

Look at it another way. What if a bystander was shot or killed. The CC guy would be looking at a trial.

Of course whats your point?

That the guy was extremely lucky. That is why he wasn't arrested.

People that shoot perps during robberies very rarely get arrested I don't think it had anything at all to do with luck. Lucky that he wasn't fatally wounded maybe.
 
Originally posted by: Modelworks
If I already have a gun aimed at the officer he would be stupid to try to draw his weapon, knowing he would be shot before he could draw since I already have the weapon out, pointed at him, with my finger on the trigger. Same thing if I have the gun pointed at someone else and you try to draw on me. I could easily kill the person before you can draw your gun.

We are not talking about a case where we notice each other and both draw our guns. If the guy has a gun pointed at you, especially at close range, and your gun is not already out, chances are you are dead if you try to draw.

If you're pointing a gun at me and mine's not out, my day already went real bad. I have a vest. You probably don't. Depending on the situation, I just might take my chances and take you out. I'd rather go down fighting than give up and get shot anyway. It really depends on the specifics of the situation.
 
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: Poulsonator
You are correct in that there's a difference. The robber wasn't pointing his gun at Wild Bill, though. In fact, we don't even know if the robber was pointing his gun at anybody as the article said the gun was only 'shown'. This wasn't justifiable homicide.

Care to explain why he wasn't arrested, then?

Look at it another way. What if a bystander was shot or killed. The CC guy would be looking at a trial.

Of course whats your point?

That the guy was extremely lucky. That is why he wasn't arrested.

He wasn't arrested because he was lucky. He wasn't arrested because he didn't commit a crime.

It could have been a crime if someone else was hit by a stray bullet. He was just lucky that someone wasn't.


 
Miami police spokesman Jeff Giordano. "There were a lot of people inside the Burger King, he may have saved lives. It was a brave act."

guess miami police are stupid too.
 
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: Poulsonator
You are correct in that there's a difference. The robber wasn't pointing his gun at Wild Bill, though. In fact, we don't even know if the robber was pointing his gun at anybody as the article said the gun was only 'shown'. This wasn't justifiable homicide.

Care to explain why he wasn't arrested, then?

Look at it another way. What if a bystander was shot or killed. The CC guy would be looking at a trial.

Of course whats your point?

That the guy was extremely lucky. That is why he wasn't arrested.

He wasn't arrested because he was lucky. He wasn't arrested because he didn't commit a crime.

It could have been a crime if someone else was hit by a stray bullet. He was just lucky that someone wasn't.

Following that logic, any law enforcement officer involved in an on-duty shooting is lucky to get away without being charged.

Maybe he was just a good shot.
 
Anyway, i guess it all worked out in the end... a robber dies and an idiot CCW holder gets his ass shot and learns a valuable lesson.
 
Originally posted by: FDF12389
According to CBS, the permit holder confronted the after chaos broke out.


Text


Watch all the videos.

Again I wouldn't have done that if the guy was just there to take the money from the register. No sense in endangering myself or anyone else.
 
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: FDF12389
According to CBS, the permit holder confronted the after chaos broke out.


Text


Watch all the videos.

Again I wouldn't have done that if the guy was just there to take the money from the register. No sense in endangering myself or anyone else.

Ah, but there's the rub - no one knows for sure that was his only intent. Hell, he may not have even known himself what his next step was if he got the cash. Unlike some posters here, I don't think that every CCW holder is itching to pull the trigger, so I like to think that he made a judgment call based upon the situation as it was unfolding. Regardless, what he did has already been deemed as justified by the authorities on scene who have far more details than any of us about the events, so who are we to second guess?
 
Originally posted by: Phokus
Anyway, i guess it all worked out in the end... a robber dies and an idiot CCW holder gets his ass shot and learns a valuable lesson.

What's the lesson?
He was wounded in an heroic effort (at least to his eyes, Miami PD, etc).

In fact, he'll probably get his 15 mins of fame (justifiable or not) once he recovers.

Would he do it again? I'd assume yes.
 
Originally posted by: dbk
Originally posted by: Phokus
Anyway, i guess it all worked out in the end... a robber dies and an idiot CCW holder gets his ass shot and learns a valuable lesson.

What's the lesson?
He was wounded in an heroic effort (at least to his eyes, Miami PD, etc).

In fact, he'll probably get his 15 mins of fame (justifiable or not) once he recovers.

Would he do it again? I'd assume yes.

Some other people might think twice about robbing places, too.
 
Originally posted by: Modelworks
It could have been a crime if someone else was hit by a stray bullet. He was just lucky that someone wasn't.

Depends on the jurisdiction. For example, RCW 9A.16.030 reads, "Homicide is excusable when committed by accident or misfortune in doing any lawful act by lawful means, without criminal negligence, or without any unlawful intent." This means that, in WA at least, the victim would not be subject to criminal prosecution in the event that a bystander were hit. The victim would still be subject to civil suits, but there would be no criminal charges.

You don't know if he was "lucky" not to hit anyone. For all you know the attacker was standing in the open with a solid backstop behind him and there was no risk to bystanders from the victim's shots.

ZV
 
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: dbk
Originally posted by: Phokus
Anyway, i guess it all worked out in the end... a robber dies and an idiot CCW holder gets his ass shot and learns a valuable lesson.

What's the lesson?
He was wounded in an heroic effort (at least to his eyes, Miami PD, etc).

In fact, he'll probably get his 15 mins of fame (justifiable or not) once he recovers.

Would he do it again? I'd assume yes.

Some other people might think twice about robbing places, too.

Of course, but I was responding to the notion that CCW holder is learning a lesson from this.
 
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: dbk
Originally posted by: Phokus
Anyway, i guess it all worked out in the end... a robber dies and an idiot CCW holder gets his ass shot and learns a valuable lesson.

What's the lesson?
He was wounded in an heroic effort (at least to his eyes, Miami PD, etc).

In fact, he'll probably get his 15 mins of fame (justifiable or not) once he recovers.

Would he do it again? I'd assume yes.

Some other people might think twice about robbing places, too.

I definitely wouldn't count on it. People don't rob BK because they can't think of anything better to do, they're desperate for some reason or another. Or just stupid.
 
too many people are butt hurt over this. the guy committed a crime and paid the ultimate price for it. had he made a "better" decision and not gone on with the robbery, he would not be dead. those are the chances we take with the decisions (good or bad) that we make.
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: dbk
Originally posted by: Phokus
Anyway, i guess it all worked out in the end... a robber dies and an idiot CCW holder gets his ass shot and learns a valuable lesson.

What's the lesson?
He was wounded in an heroic effort (at least to his eyes, Miami PD, etc).

In fact, he'll probably get his 15 mins of fame (justifiable or not) once he recovers.

Would he do it again? I'd assume yes.

Some other people might think twice about robbing places, too.

I definitely wouldn't count on it. People don't rob BK because they can't think of anything better to do, they're desperate for some reason or another. Or just stupid.

I said "might think twice", not "won't ever do again". 😛
 
Originally posted by: Modelworks
While I applaud someone for defending themselves I do think in this circumstance it was very very risky.
It would have been better to have just let the guy get his money and go than to provoke a gun fight inside a area that may have many people.
If the guy was going to shoot someone that I can understand. If you look at robberies the majority are just after the cash and don't want a murder conviction.

And this is why criminals do what they want, because of people w/ attitudes like you. Why not be thankful this man stood up for justice? If criminals thought that the general public (which is just about everywhere) was willing to fight aginst them, and not just the police force (which is never where it needs to be it seems) they would be less likely to commit crimes.

Would you rather get robbed and perhaps pistol whipped, or would you rather about to be robbed and beat but then a stranger stands up for you?

I'm pretty sure this was a repeat criminal, someone doing this out of desperation would (hopefully) not bring a loaded weapon. The sight of a gun is enought o scare most people. Bringing a loaded gun and the gusto to use it, hardened criminal.
 
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: dbk
Originally posted by: Phokus
Anyway, i guess it all worked out in the end... a robber dies and an idiot CCW holder gets his ass shot and learns a valuable lesson.

What's the lesson?
He was wounded in an heroic effort (at least to his eyes, Miami PD, etc).

In fact, he'll probably get his 15 mins of fame (justifiable or not) once he recovers.

Would he do it again? I'd assume yes.

Some other people might think twice about robbing places, too.

Bingo! I was searching through this thread hoping someone would make my point. The thing to take out of this, is that it sends a crystal clear message to someone who may be considering a robbery in the future.
 
*Popcorn*

Amazing the amount of people on here who think cops have all this training to be in a shootout. Maybe they watch too much tv.

Its not often that I see cops anywhere but at a range taking aimed shots at a paper target. Obviously some of them train for these situations, but a lot of them don't even like firearms that much and only shoot enough to qualify. Just last Sunday I was in a private section of a range going through drills. Sprinting across the room, reloading and holstering my weapon, then drawing and shooting at bowling pins with cardboard targets in the background. This included offhand drawing and reloading with my dominant hand tied behind my back. Drills where the lights off and turned on with the "innocent cardboard bystanders" weremoved and I was timed. Shooting from prone, kneeling and from cover.

If someone had been hurt, the charges would have gone with the criminal to his grave aside from possible bullshit lawsuits from the people who had to witness the horrible situation where a felon gets exactly what he deserves. Its this kind of mentality that encourages criminal behavior. The same people who think there shouldn't be high speed pursuits.

EDIT: I see similarities with how scammers and conmen walk around and just see marks everywhere. That is what we are to these low-lives. Just victims.
 
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: TheVrolok
I fail to see how this is, in any way, a positive event. 1 dead, possibly a second on the way .. all for a few hundred bucks? I find that hard to rationalize.

One criminal off the streets.

 
Back
Top