Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
Really? I'm thinking that my 7800 isn't going to hold up for the next year with the deluge of graphically intense games coming out.
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
Really? I'm thinking that my 7800 isn't going to hold up for the next year with the deluge of graphically intense games coming out.
Anything that will bring a 7800GTX to unplayable frame rates will do the same to the X1950XT. There is no reason to upgrade, unless it costs nothing (Ie; sell the 7800 to a friend, buy a X1950XT for same cost).
To be honest, I'd recommend waiting until the 2950Pro, and the Nvidia DX10 gen 2 cards hit the streets, then make an educated pick.
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
Really? I'm thinking that my 7800 isn't going to hold up for the next year with the deluge of graphically intense games coming out.
Anything that will bring a 7800GTX to unplayable frame rates will do the same to the X1950XT. There is no reason to upgrade, unless it costs nothing (Ie; sell the 7800 to a friend, buy a X1950XT for same cost).
To be honest, I'd recommend waiting until the 2950Pro, and the Nvidia DX10 gen 2 cards hit the streets, then make an educated pick.
Well, playable frame rates and things looking nice are two completely different things. What do you consider a playable frame rate?
Originally posted by: Laminator
I beg to differ with what has been said in this thread. I recently sold my 7900GT 512MB @ 7900GTX speeds and bought an X1900 XT 512MB. The X1900 XT 512MB is much, much faster in Need for Speed: Carbon. I will test out newer, shader-intensive games like Rainbow Six: Vegas and BioShock and tell you the results when I'm done.
Forget Tom's Hardware charts. The games they use are pretty dated. It's now all about the SHADERS!
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
i upgraded froma 7600 gt to an x1950xt 6wks ago and it's been night and day diff. I usually use toms guide for help when choosing vid cards, and the x1950xt was 4 levels above the 7600gt, so I felt pretty confident that it was a smart upgrade for $90 after selling the 7600gt. The 7800 gtx (256) is right in between my 7600 gt and the x1950xt, so I think that it will be a tough decision. I've upgraded just two levels in the past and I was very disappointed, I think that you need to go 3 or more to really make it worth your while for any length of time. If you can swing it for 40-50 bucks after selling the other card then it's probably worth it, but I think it would be a mistake to pay 130 or so which is probably more in line with what you're looking at for this swap. as a side note, the x1900xt 512 is quite a bit better at 1680x1050 than my x1950xt 256. Here's the link: http://www.tomshardware.com/20...ney/page7.html#summary
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
that is a 512 mb card. The best 3dmark06 I've ever gotten on my 256 mb card was at 668 core and 936 memory with my e6750 at 3.704. I got 6311. I have the link at home, I'll post it later.
@arkaign: I only spent 155 for my card after shipping - 65 for selling my 7600 gt, so for me the $90 made sense. It would have been more like $200 for me, so double the price, to get the 8800gts 320. In this case I think that it would be incredibly hard to justify spending 200 on an x1950xt when you can get the evga 8800gts 320 at newegg for 260 AR.
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
I'd love an 8800 but it's out of the old price range at the moment.