- Sep 6, 2000
- 25,383
- 1,013
- 126
Sorry, but i feel the need to rant for a moment regarding an idea which some have posted here, that we should preserve the 'natural beauty of the refuge for our children.'
Where drilling would happen in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not 'a cathedral of nature.' It's barren tundra, utter and absolute desolation. In earlier days, we would have called it 'wasteland.' There is nothing there that you would even want to take a picture of. If you could go anywhere in the world, this is the last place you'd want to go. If you ended up in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, the first thing you'd want is out. Neither you, nor your children, are going to be going to visit ANWAR anytime soon, much less moving there. That being said, i think that it's fair to make the argument that we should not develop the area, for various reasons, but please do so with the recognition that this isn't beachfront Hawaiian property we're talking about.
Okay, rant over, we will now return to our regularly scheduled flamefest on the subject...
Where drilling would happen in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not 'a cathedral of nature.' It's barren tundra, utter and absolute desolation. In earlier days, we would have called it 'wasteland.' There is nothing there that you would even want to take a picture of. If you could go anywhere in the world, this is the last place you'd want to go. If you ended up in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, the first thing you'd want is out. Neither you, nor your children, are going to be going to visit ANWAR anytime soon, much less moving there. That being said, i think that it's fair to make the argument that we should not develop the area, for various reasons, but please do so with the recognition that this isn't beachfront Hawaiian property we're talking about.
Okay, rant over, we will now return to our regularly scheduled flamefest on the subject...
