Boo Hoo f'n hoo. The government doesnt get money from the sky (well, may be it does), it has to come from other Americans.
Meet the Americans who will be hurt by cripling debt.
So when government regulations on the coal industry caused massive job losses . ... those people were faceless? When taxes on gas cause truckers to not be able to eat . . they were faceless? I seem to remember people saying something along the lines of "well then they should pick another job"..... but since these are government workers we're supposed to feel sorry for them? Nope.
If we can survive with 20% cut and I think we can, we should cut 20% everywhere.
And Americans demand certain services. You think those services are free? :hmm:
So people that work in the government are supposed to work without any time off? Leave has been cancelled for people working in government positions to cover the furloughs. 🙄
Now I am confused. Aren't furloughs time off of work? ^_^
Now I am confused. Aren't furloughs time off of work? ^_^
So people that work in the government are supposed to work without any time off? Leave has been cancelled for people working in government positions to cover the furloughs. 🙄
It's not just Congress that forgets that real human beings are affected. It's all of the dittoheads who drone endlessly about the evils of government spending. They act as if tax dollars are being poured into a shredder. It's an ignorant, even idiotic point of view. The overwhelming majority of tax dollars go right back into the economy, either directly via government employees and beneficiaries, or indirectly into private sector contracts. That doesn't mean spending cuts aren't sometimes necessary, but let's not pretend such cuts don't hurt real people.
Based on my own past government experience, I also agree that across-the-board budget cuts are the least efficient way to cut spending. They are easy and brainless for the politicians, but they are also irresponsible. They invariably result in far more meat being cut than fat because most fat is entrenched within the system. Cutting it requires focus and planning, something you don't get in "Cut x%!!!" fire drills.
And Americans demand certain services. You think those services are free? :hmm:
No, not at all. What did I say that has you so befuddled?Are you fucking out of your mind insane?
Indeed it does. The largest military in the world (many times over), largely used to extend and protect the financial interests of America's elite; the civil court system (enforces contracts, IP laws, etc.); law enforcement and the criminal court system (theoretically used to keep the haves safe from crime); the banking system; bailing out the banking system; roads, air travel, bridges, reliable power, communications, and other utilities, something all businesses rely on to get raw materials, run their offices and plants, get their employees to work, and sell and distribute their goods and services; education (gives those same businesses the skilled work force they need); public safety and health system; food and safety inspections; basic research; etc., etc. The list is truly endless.Welfare, food stamps, disability, medicare, medicaid, rent stipends, free cell phones, the list goes on.
Ah ha! It's that same reading comprehension issue. I didn't say the have-more takers that cry about taxes are the only greedy Americans. Many of the poor takers are quite greedy as well, milking the system for all they can. Of course many more of the poor are quite proud, and take only what they need to live, but you probably don't hear about them on Fox, or talk radio, or whatever echo chamber you call home.Are you trying to tell me that the people who actually are paying for all the free stuff others believe they are entitled to... are the greedy ones who receive all the benefits of America without paying for them?
I'm just going to repeat myself here. Although you replied to my earlier post, you apparently did not read it:[ ... ]
When the governments taxes an American worker, that is money that is pulled from the economy. ...
You are posting ignorant, and often incoherent gibberish. You seem to be way out of your league, regurgitating little sounds bites without the slightest comprehension of what they might mean or how they might apply.Look at it his way, with no annual budgets, replaced by continuing resolutions, you get across the board spending increased by way of base line budgeting. This is killing our nations credit and wasting tonnes of real money that could go into the economy. Why have you and you like not railed against it? All money goes into the economy, just how much is used to improve it vs harm it via borrowing? You are using half baked bs logic.,
Our Congress critters are all at home now after having flown home on the taxpayers dime. (Something they do every Thursday afternoon.) When they decide to all fly back to D.C. (on the taxpayers dime) to resume the people's business they may consider it.So...are Congressmen and women...and their staff also going to have to take the mandatory furlough days...and cuts in pay?
If so, maybe it's a good thing. If not...then fuck them...they should have to suffer the same budget cuts as everyone else.
I'm just going to repeat myself here. Although you replied to my earlier post, you apparently did not read it:
"They act as if tax dollars are being poured into a shredder. It's an ignorant, even idiotic point of view. The overwhelming majority of tax dollars go right back into the economy, either directly via government employees and beneficiaries, or indirectly into private sector contracts."The money is simply not "pulled from the economy", no matter how much your masters chant otherwise. It enters the economy through different hands, but it still goes back into the economy. Indeed, in many cases more of it goes into the economy, and more quickly, since middle class workers spend most of their money.
The money is simply not "pulled from the economy", no matter how much your masters chant otherwise. It enters the economy through different hands, but it still goes back into the economy. Indeed, in many cases more of it goes into the economy, and more quickly, since middle class workers spend most of their money.
This. And am I the only one who realizes that if the government can get by on a 20% furlow, that they are probably overstaffed by a similar amount?
When you're done huffing and puffing at straw men, what part of my comment (i.e., my actual words) was inaccurate?So there it is. It's better to take from the rich and give to the poor because the poor will spend it and the rich just stuff it into mattresses. Just like the other thread the government knows better how to spend your money than you do.
Doh! Because there was no corresponding increase in government spending. It is the spending that helps the economy.Okay, lets think about this a minute. If raising taxes doesn't pull money from the economy why was everyone talking about the negative impact that letting the payroll tax cut would have on the economy? 😕
I don't demand the government take my money and provide my retirement funds... I can do that on my own. I don't demand that people get $4000 electric scooters for free, and I don't demand that the president play golf with tiger woods. I don't demand the government to continue building c-17 cargo planes for the USAF when generals have said they have more than enough planes.
Fiscal conservatives aren't for dissolving the federal government. But we expect the government to be good stewards of taxpayer money. When the governments taxes an American worker, that is money that is pulled from the economy. The government should provide limited services not be our entire economy and not encourage people to live off the governments teet.