Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What does a dog catcher from nowhere know about foreign policy. Imagine a screw loose fundamentalist president.
You mean again???
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What does a dog catcher from nowhere know about foreign policy. Imagine a screw loose fundamentalist president.
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: Ballatician
Originally posted by: quest55720
Good the media brougt this on themselves. They went on a witch hunt they attacked her family. I hope she does a bunch of interviews with fox news and gets softball after softball question. Just to rub it in the face of the MSM the scum they are.
IF family is going to be kept completely out of it, why does she exploit her newborn to make herself look like a champion of special needs children?
Family being kept "completely out of it" doesn't obviously doesn't mean the children should be locked up and not seen or heard about.
Did Obama "exploit" his two girls by having them go onstage at the DNC to say hi to him when he was on the jumbotron via satellite? I think only the biggest, nuttiest loons would think so...
Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: Ballatician
Originally posted by: quest55720
Good the media brougt this on themselves. They went on a witch hunt they attacked her family. I hope she does a bunch of interviews with fox news and gets softball after softball question. Just to rub it in the face of the MSM the scum they are.
IF family is going to be kept completely out of it, why does she exploit her newborn to make herself look like a champion of special needs children?
Family being kept "completely out of it" doesn't obviously doesn't mean the children should be locked up and not seen or heard about.
Did Obama "exploit" his two girls by having them go onstage at the DNC to say hi to him when he was on the jumbotron via satellite? I think only the biggest, nuttiest loons would think so...
Nothing wrong with having "her" family on stage. But, only the "nuttiest of loons" would think that ushering in the self proclaimed "fucking redneck" who doesn't want kids up there on stage to be with her "good" christain pregnant teenage daughter so they can "act" as if they are in blissful everlasting love is "not" damage-control "image" exploitation at it's finest
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: Ballatician
Originally posted by: quest55720
Good the media brougt this on themselves. They went on a witch hunt they attacked her family. I hope she does a bunch of interviews with fox news and gets softball after softball question. Just to rub it in the face of the MSM the scum they are.
IF family is going to be kept completely out of it, why does she exploit her newborn to make herself look like a champion of special needs children?
Family being kept "completely out of it" doesn't obviously doesn't mean the children should be locked up and not seen or heard about.
Did Obama "exploit" his two girls by having them go onstage at the DNC to say hi to him when he was on the jumbotron via satellite? I think only the biggest, nuttiest loons would think so...
Nothing wrong with having "her" family on stage. But, only the "nuttiest of loons" would think that ushering in the self proclaimed "fucking redneck" who doesn't want kids up there on stage to be with her "good" christain pregnant teenage daughter so they can "act" as if they are in blissful everlasting love is "not" damage-control "image" exploitation at it's finest
Just admit it: you would hate her no matter who she brought on stage, wouldn't you?
Should she really have left her daughter off of the stage because she was pregnant? And if she does bring her daughter up, why shouldn't she bring her fiance? Had her daughter been 21 and non-pregnant her fiance on stage would not be an issue at all. The fact that it suddenly makes it an issue for YOU simply because she is 17 and is pregnant speaks volumes about YOU and nothing about Palin.
Originally posted by: QED
Please show me all of the hard-hitting interviews Obama and Biden have done... then we can talk.
Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
Face it, it was "image" exploitation front and center, getting the electorate to talk about something within the "framework" of "image". Get the press into it and there you go, all the real issues are on the back burner. its a trick they having been useing all election. Just pointing this idiocy out. I'm actually happy they did it, so the people other than his base, the swings and independents can see it for what it is.
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: QED
Please show me all of the hard-hitting interviews Obama and Biden have done... then we can talk.
Guess you missed the 20-odd presidential debates on national tv. How many times has Obama been on Meet the Press and similar shows? Specifically as to Biden, he's been interviewed how many dozens of times over the past 30 years? How many times on Meet the Press?
Palin is an unknown.
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: Ballatician
Originally posted by: quest55720
Good the media brougt this on themselves. They went on a witch hunt they attacked her family. I hope she does a bunch of interviews with fox news and gets softball after softball question. Just to rub it in the face of the MSM the scum they are.
IF family is going to be kept completely out of it, why does she exploit her newborn to make herself look like a champion of special needs children?
Family being kept "completely out of it" doesn't obviously doesn't mean the children should be locked up and not seen or heard about.
Did Obama "exploit" his two girls by having them go onstage at the DNC to say hi to him when he was on the jumbotron via satellite? I think only the biggest, nuttiest loons would think so...
Originally posted by: Ldir
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: Ballatician
Originally posted by: quest55720
Good the media brougt this on themselves. They went on a witch hunt they attacked her family. I hope she does a bunch of interviews with fox news and gets softball after softball question. Just to rub it in the face of the MSM the scum they are.
IF family is going to be kept completely out of it, why does she exploit her newborn to make herself look like a champion of special needs children?
Family being kept "completely out of it" doesn't obviously doesn't mean the children should be locked up and not seen or heard about.
Did Obama "exploit" his two girls by having them go onstage at the DNC to say hi to him when he was on the jumbotron via satellite? I think only the biggest, nuttiest loons would think so...
Don't act stupid. There is a big difference. Palin used her baby to pitch support for special needs kids. Obama did nothing similar to use his kids.
Originally posted by: QED
Obama has, on numerous times, brought up his daughters during speeches and in interviews-- both to share information about his family life and to make political points.
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: QED
Obama has, on numerous times, brought up his daughters during speeches and in interviews-- both to share information about his family life and to make political points.
when? what point was he making?
Originally posted by: Ldir
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: Ballatician
Originally posted by: quest55720
Good the media brougt this on themselves. They went on a witch hunt they attacked her family. I hope she does a bunch of interviews with fox news and gets softball after softball question. Just to rub it in the face of the MSM the scum they are.
IF family is going to be kept completely out of it, why does she exploit her newborn to make herself look like a champion of special needs children?
Family being kept "completely out of it" doesn't obviously doesn't mean the children should be locked up and not seen or heard about.
Did Obama "exploit" his two girls by having them go onstage at the DNC to say hi to him when he was on the jumbotron via satellite? I think only the biggest, nuttiest loons would think so...
Don't act stupid. There is a big difference. Palin used her baby to pitch support for special needs kids. Obama did nothing similar to use his kids.
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Infidel
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Good God people, it's been all of a week since she was announced and you are already trying to make claims of "hiding"? It was Convention week too no less - she isn't going to be out on the bobblehead circuit instantly, let alone during Convention week.
I swear you people have never gone through an election cycle before... sheesh.
No one here is trying to make claims of hiding. People here are responding to the McCain/Palin spokesperson's claim that she will not speak unless it is scripted.
Do not try to spin this into yet another false claim by the left, that is a dishonest claim.
OK, please prove the following claim: "McCain/Palin spokesperson's claim that she will not speak unless it is scripted"
Because from the clip I watched, no such statement was made. It seems some self-righteous journalist has embellished what was actually said. But please do prove your claim and the claim the rest of the lefties are banking on in this thread. 🙂
Clip you are banking on...
Good luck! 🙂
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Oh, and I have no doubt that she'll do plenty of interviews between now and the election. This all just seems like alot of fluff and puff from those who wish to knock her off her game before she even starts.
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
Face it, it was "image" exploitation front and center, getting the electorate to talk about something within the "framework" of "image". Get the press into it and there you go, all the real issues are on the back burner. its a trick they having been useing all election. Just pointing this idiocy out. I'm actually happy they did it, so the people other than his base, the swings and independents can see it for what it is.
What kind of fucking twilight-zone world do you live in where you believe having your pregnant teenage daughter on stage with you (serving as a reminder to what some would call either hyprocisy or bad parenting) is the most politically expedient thing to do? The fact that only loons like you are bringing this up (and not even a rogue left-leaning journalist) shows you out of touch you are on this...
If I was advising her from a purely political point-of-view, I would have had the daughter stay home (make up a story about having a doctor's appointment or something) to avoid the discussion altogether.
But again, let me ask you since you seem to be dodging the question: what SHOULD she have done that would have made you happy?
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Ldir
Don't act stupid. There is a big difference. Palin used her baby to pitch support for special needs kids. Obama did nothing similar to use his kids.
That isn't quite true. He used his daughter in that bit about being "punished with a baby" 😉
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Ldir
Don't act stupid. There is a big difference. Palin used her baby to pitch support for special needs kids. Obama did nothing similar to use his kids.
That isn't quite true. He used his daughter in that bit about being "punished with a baby" 😉
Obama was talking about sex-ed. Anyway, are you arguing that dropping a responsibility like an unexpected child on a 16 or 17 year old girl isn't going to make her life difficult? I would imagine that if Palin and her daughter could use a magic '<<' button they'd both do it.
Originally posted by: JHoNNy1OoO
I honestly can't believe they might try to pull this off. I'm sure the "liberal" media will push considerably. If the McCain campaign doesn't think she can stand up to reporters in an interview how in the world is she suppose to stand up to other nations. I'm just flabbergasted.