OMG Intel possibly considering selling unlocked p4s

SolrFlare24

Member
Feb 13, 2002
95
0
0
Thats what the word on the street is from a couple of different sources. Of course I'll take it with a grain of salt until I hear official word. But essentially the rumor is this:

Intel realises they have a slight edge over AMD right now. They know that Hammer may or may not change things but why not hit AMD as hard as they can while they have that edge. Soooo

Intel is evaluating the possibilities of selling a new performance model Northwood CPU. This "performance" model will simply be a regular P4 northwood at whatever speed only it will be unlocked. Intel would use this not only as an extra edge against AMD but also as a Marketing tool...youknow something like, "Buy the Intel P4 Performance CPU" and some such.

Of course if they pull something like this I could easily see them selling the regular northwoods then selling unlocked CPUs at a slightly higher price point(like $50 more or such).

But, this would be a big hit to AMD in the performance builder/overclocker market...imagine what you could do with a P4 Northwood with it unlocked...especially in the 3ghz+ range. Couple this with Intel possibly turning on hyperthreading soon as well, and you have a chip with a lot of capability.

Anyway, as I said this is the word on the street and nothing official, and I'm not going to take it too seriously until I hear something out of Intel or a more definative word on the subject. But I am certainly keeping my fingers crossed anyway :)

Thought you might find this interesting either way

Solr_Flare
 

redpriest_

Senior member
Oct 30, 1999
223
0
0
Doesn't sound too credible IMO. Intel does not make their money in the "overclockers" market. Also, I wouldn't bet on air cooled northwoods far beyond 3 ghz.

I have yet to see a meaningful comparison of where Hyperthreading will help the consumer market at all.
 

SolrFlare24

Member
Feb 13, 2002
95
0
0
Agreed that Hyperthreading won't help the consumer market that much unless, like I said, Microsoft and other companies put in code to make their OS true Hyperthread users...ie use of hyperthreading is done on the OS level not program level. Even then it won't help too much...but if its already there anyway and isn't going to add to the cost as is...its still a plus to have it there for the heavy level stuff that can take advantage of it(encoding stuff, photo processing, etc).

As for needing more than aircooling past 3ghz....well Intel just very recently showed off a P4 running at 3.6ghz aircooled so it can and will be done but agreed that in the 3.5 to 4ghz range the northwood is going to start hitting its limit.
 

Starfox

Banned
Jul 31, 2002
392
0
0
gosh, i wish it was true, but just sounds to good, and you know what they say! hehe
 

Wingznut

Elite Member
Dec 28, 1999
16,968
2
0
Originally posted by: redpriest_
Doesn't sound too credible IMO. Intel does not make their money in the "overclockers" market.
Nobody makes their money in this teeny-tiny demographic.

It would most likely cost more to impliment a second "non-locking" process, than could possibly be made by the few who would buy such a product.

 

Demonicon

Senior member
Oct 30, 2001
570
0
0
Sounds like a PR disaster waiting to happen to me. I mean joe blow got such and such an OC and I got diddly, plus you know they would put limiters somehow on high it could possibly go.

Plus why do they even need to do this, the processors they sell now overclock. In the enthusiast market (who these procs are aimed at) sales are virtually tied to overclock ability, at the very least it will sway a close decision.

Having overclock ability as a feature completely negates the reason for OC'ing in the first place, now instead of free performance, you get to pay to get their permission to OC.

This idea is stupid!