• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

OMG: 210 Million bux - CEO of Home Depot gets after resigning

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
yea f*ck those idiots!

thats what i say every time congress raise their own paychecks!

What congress makes is nothing compared to $210 million. I wouldn't even know what to do with $210 million. Thats so ungodly rediculous.
 
heh yea well they have some checks and balances i guess, go too far and the investigations start. no such luck with ceos. they just go write sob story books like carly fiorina and bag even more sweet cash.
 
the real problem with the law is that the delaware supreme court sees no conflict of interest when you are helping your buddy get a job in a quid pro quo. nevermind that it is exactly that behavior that leads the same 50 guys to serve on each others boards and determine each other's pay at the expense of shareholders.
 
Originally posted by: yamadakun
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
yea f*ck those idiots!

thats what i say every time congress raise their own paychecks!

What congress makes is nothing compared to $210 million. I wouldn't even know what to do with $210 million. Thats so ungodly rediculous.

Buy three apartments in Manhattan.

lol pwned. i guess not so ridiculous. what's ridiculous is his spelling.
 
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
You didn't hit any nerve, just countering your silly post. The severance was created in a contract before, I have never denied or ignored that. I find it humorous that your only attempt at countering any logic is that you just try to talk around the points. I said $210 is more than anybody should get and he got it through a contract written up by his buddies. He was a top c-level employee at a non-retail, non-P&L role. This is a significant difference considering most employees that do end up in that type of stretch role are usually unable to follow through, look at Catherine West at JC penny.

Another example of you talking around points. You seem to think I say that managers are lazy, when in fact I imply that they are in league or simply don't want to buck a trend, it helps them in multiple ways and I really don't think they care too much for investors, by and large.

I would love to see those quotes, please forward them to my mail box.

I happened upon a very timely Times article a couple of days ago, ironic as I rarely read the Times. It detailed one of the driving forces behind the current increasing CEO pay packages, and it wasn't board member collusion...

Public companies have to compete with PE firms for quality C-level executives. Frissora at Hertz received over $33MM in comp in under 6 months to leave Tenneco. Drexler at J. Crew has received $300MM+ since leaving Gap. They quote Henry Silverman of Cendant fame as claiming his next job will not be with a public company. Even David Calhoun, a GE contemporary of Nardelli's, has a $100MM+ package. Finally, they mention that Nardelli has already been offered more money from PE firms in need of his services.

And this is all while not having to worry about public company regulations and red tape. Even Hank Paulson endorsed a softening of regulations on public companies last month. I'm actually shocked that these recent public CEO pay packages surprise anyone remotely versed in recent business events. Public companies not only have to overcompensate because CEOs receive greater scrunity compared with a private company, but significant ownership opportunities are much more abundant via the private route.

And don't expect it to end any time soon. PE firms are becoming larger and more active every week. Half my friends from college are in investment banking hoping to lateral into a PE firm or HF as soon as possible or have done so already, so I know full well how the need for public money is diminishing. This economic climate can only result higher pay packages at both the private and public levels.

And here's the PM...

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
No, I have never posted my salary, nor would I ever do so.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: LegendKiller in What are your thoughts and experiences w/Financial certs/degrees? (CFA/CFP/MBA/CPA)
After my MBA, my first job sucked (40's) and my next job doubled my salary after 50% of raises from the first job. I expect my salary to keep going up, albiet not quite as fast.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: LegendKiller in How much do you make with your career?
27, masters, 110+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: goodoptics
Home Depot is paying the new CEO less.

ATLANTA (AP) -- The Home Depot Inc. is paying new Chief Executive Frank Blake a fraction of what it paid his predecessor, Bob Nardelli, and has taken the unusual step of promising Blake no severance package if he leaves.

Home Depot Paying CEO 'Low' $8.9M Salary

That is ridiculously low to run a $83 billion market cap, $90 billion revenue company.

It's all relative though. It's low compared to other CEOs, but that's kind of going with the argument that CEOs are being paid way too much.
 
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: goodoptics
Home Depot is paying the new CEO less.

ATLANTA (AP) -- The Home Depot Inc. is paying new Chief Executive Frank Blake a fraction of what it paid his predecessor, Bob Nardelli, and has taken the unusual step of promising Blake no severance package if he leaves.

Home Depot Paying CEO 'Low' $8.9M Salary

That is ridiculously low to run a $83 billion market cap, $90 billion revenue company.

James Sinegal, CEO of Costco, is paid $450,000. $25 billion market cap, $60 billion revenue company. Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway is paid $100,000. $121 billion market cap, $81 billion revenue company.
 
Hopefully he reverses some of the back-asswards policies Nardelli instituted. For example, leaving our W2s in plain sight, in alphabetical order for anyone to grab. Another one of Nardelli's cost cutting measures.
 
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: goodoptics
Home Depot is paying the new CEO less.

ATLANTA (AP) -- The Home Depot Inc. is paying new Chief Executive Frank Blake a fraction of what it paid his predecessor, Bob Nardelli, and has taken the unusual step of promising Blake no severance package if he leaves.

Home Depot Paying CEO 'Low' $8.9M Salary

That is ridiculously low to run a $83 billion market cap, $90 billion revenue company.

James Sinegal, CEO of Costco, is paid $450,000. $25 billion market cap, $60 billion revenue company. Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway is paid $100,000. $121 billion market cap, $81 billion revenue company.

And Steve Jobs is paid $0.

It evens out in the end with all-in compensation.

Sinegal and Buffett salaries are for show.
 
Originally posted by: BigJ
Hopefully he reverses some of the back-asswards policies Nardelli instituted. For example, leaving our W2s in plain sight, in alphabetical order for anyone to grab.

This was policy ordered from Nardelli himself?!?
 
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: BigJ
Hopefully he reverses some of the back-asswards policies Nardelli instituted. For example, leaving our W2s in plain sight, in alphabetical order for anyone to grab.

This was policy ordered from Nardelli himself?!?

Cut costs through any means possible. This is just an example of his philosophy for the company taking hold in another form.
 
I was going to make some comments, but I see this issue is already being discussed.

Yes, it sucks that these people get to run a company into the ground, rack up insane bills on their expense accounts, and then leave with a ridiculous golden parachute when its all over.

Meanwhile we have more and more problems getting bigger and bigger in the US every day.
It makes it difficult for me to feel pity about the higher tax brackets.
 
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: BigJ
Hopefully he reverses some of the back-asswards policies Nardelli instituted. For example, leaving our W2s in plain sight, in alphabetical order for anyone to grab.

This was policy ordered from Nardelli himself?!?

Cut costs through any means possible. This is just an example of his philosophy for the company taking hold in another form.

How would leaving W2s out in the open cut costs?
 
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: BigJ
Hopefully he reverses some of the back-asswards policies Nardelli instituted. For example, leaving our W2s in plain sight, in alphabetical order for anyone to grab.

This was policy ordered from Nardelli himself?!?

Cut costs through any means possible. This is just an example of his philosophy for the company taking hold in another form.

How would leaving W2s out in the open cut costs?

Used to be mailed in the past. Reducing the costs of mailing out almost 400,000 W2s.
 
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: BigJ
Used to be mailed in the past. Reducing the costs of mailing out almost 400,000 W2s.

Are the employees supposed to just pick them up at this point?

Yep. Certain stores will just have them out (read: laziness), even though all stores are supposed to have them attatched to the paychecks/stubs.
 
Originally posted by: BigJ
Yep. Certain stores will just have them out (read: laziness), even though all stores are supposed to have them attatched to the paychecks/stubs.

No one even passes them out? I'm not sure how each HD is run but is there someone in each branch that's in charge of HR?
 
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: BigJ
Yep. Certain stores will just have them out (read: laziness), even though all stores are supposed to have them attatched to the paychecks/stubs.

No one even passes them out? I'm not sure how each HD is run but is there someone in each branch that's in charge of HR?

NOPE!
 
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: BigJ
Yep. Certain stores will just have them out (read: laziness), even though all stores are supposed to have them attatched to the paychecks/stubs.

No one even passes them out? I'm not sure how each HD is run but is there someone in each branch that's in charge of HR?

NOPE!

I guess he's worth all $210 million than. He's got my vote.
 
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: BigJ
Used to be mailed in the past. Reducing the costs of mailing out almost 400,000 W2s.

Are the employees supposed to just pick them up at this point?

Yep. Certain stores will just have them out (read: laziness), even though all stores are supposed to have them attatched to the paychecks/stubs.

wow i thought it was a legal requirement to have the W2s mailed before a certain date.
 
Back
Top